Joshen
Norm Smith Medallist
North and Essendon were the first clubs to talk to Ellis for whatever its worth.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Draft Whispers on the AFL website makes for an interesting read. Has Wingard slipping to 6, Greene to Brissie at 8 with Tomlinson of serious interest to the Lions at 12, Crozier sliding beyond 20.
If I was to take a punt based on these rumours:
1. Patton
2. Coniglio
3. Tyson
4. Longer
5. Hoskin-Elliot
6. Wingard
7. Buntine
8. Greene
9. Sumner
10. Tomlinson
11. Adams
12. Paine
13. McInnes
14. Haynes
15. Kavanagh
16. Kersten
17. Talia
18. Ellis
19. Markworth
20. Mckenzie
21. Mitchell
22. Crozier
23. Lockyer
24. Manson
25. Bolger
26. Docherty
I wouldn't say either of them were must inclusions, the only big change I would make to B&S' list is that Docherty should be way, way higher.No Devon Smith?? or even Sam Frost!
no doubt mate herein lies the rub. just getting the players and spotting the best is one thing. as you said development is another. would you agree the tiges drafting and development is better lately?
Solid post.and our recruiting manager traded p26 for p32 and p34. I think its not quite as simple as weak after p30. Maybe its determined in how quick they will come to hand or how obvious their talent is?
I'll put Wells up against anyone , I bet he gets someone of worth with one of the picks
Look at 09 when Geelong made a similar move with their 2nd rounder:with all due respect since fj has taken over our drafting has been pretty good. its probably more the development of our draftees more than the picks themselves that were lacking. and to be fair the dons arent immune to some mistakes just like all other clubs.
Brisbane may pip Freo to Kersten @12Boseley going to freo didnt come from the paper, but i wouldnt say what a journalist has written in the paper to be clueless.
I dare say freo will take Ellis and Kersten with picks 16 and 20 respectivily and use 29 on a tall defender Boseley, Lockyer and Frost will all come under consideration.
Drafting has been better but will have to wait on the development front. Lets see how your mid to late round picks go in a few years time. Also even if they are doing better it is always fun to take cheap shots at Richmond!!!
Solid post.
Not unlike the Burgoyne deal in 09 - you got pick 40 and 40-something for pick 30-something.
To me, it says he/they are confident there will be plenty of worthwhile kids around at pick 34.
If anyone really thinks there is going to be 30 good players in the draft; and they'll all go from 1-30 in perfect order, they live in a dream world. Far too subjective; far too many variables. Geelong are backing (like they did in 09) that a good kid or two will fall through (I know I was fair pissed we passed on Christensen at 33! - and ant555 said he'd be happy to pull the trigger with 9) .
Look at 09 when Geelong made a similar move with their 2nd rounder:
I'm not convinced Richmond's influx (Martin, Astbury, Griffiths, Dea, Nason, Taylor - 1 gun, 2 gone, 3 look OK) are better as a group than Geelong's (Christensen, Cowan, Vardy, Menzel, Duncan + Pods - all 5 look pretty good).
And that was starting with pick 3 etc rather than 17; the other clubs are meant to be getting a push-start over the top sides.
Plus, there's always 12+ years (& 3 flags); compared to 3 or so for the Richmond bloke.
The man can do the job, no question!
absolutely no doubt on the job he has done but to be fair its a bit easier for young players to slip into top teams than the reverse.
and our recruiting manager traded p26 for p32 and p34. I think its not quite as simple as weak after p30. Maybe its determined in how quick they will come to hand or how obvious their talent is?
I'll put Wells up against anyone , I bet he gets someone of worth with one of the picks
No Devon Smith?? or even Sam Frost!
Kane Mitchell, a mature age (~23) midfielder from Claremont, has had an interview with Essendon recently. Another mature age rookie success story??
I definitely think mitchell will easily make the grade. Think he's a better player than howlett and howlett has done quite well with essendon. From memory mitchell also posted a sub 3 second sprint time and a 15+ beep test when tested.
I dont think there would be many teams interested in him, cant be more than 4 and id say probably only one team before Essendon recently, so they must be right in the mix to pick him up and have stated they may look at some older,mature players for the rookie draft.
Good athlete, size worries and kicking worries for me. Better than Howlett at WAFL level but not AFL level IMO.
It completley depends on the circumstances. For the last 3 years its been nearly impossible for any youngster to break into Geelong's defense
well taylor did. but yes i see your point but they have added some juniors thru the midfield and fwd to great effect. you cant tell me that playing in a top team is harder than coming into a poor team.
Disagree entirely so there we go.absolutely no doubt on the job he has done but to be fair its a bit easier for young players to slip into top teams than the reverse.
Solid post.
Look at 09 when Geelong made a similar move with their 2nd rounder:
I'm not convinced Richmond's influx (Martin, Astbury, Griffiths, Dea, Nason, Taylor - 1 gun, 2 gone, 3 look OK) are better as a group than Geelong's (Christensen, Cowan, Vardy, Menzel, Duncan + Pods - all 5 look pretty good).
And that was starting with pick 3 etc rather than 17; the other clubs are meant to be getting a push-start over the top sides.
The man can do the job, no question!