Conca will be a better player than Heppell and anyone who says otherwise is derailing the thread and will be met with abuse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Conca will be a better player than Heppell and anyone who says otherwise is derailing the thread and will be met with abuse.
Conca will be a better player than Heppell and anyone who says otherwise is derailing the thread and will be met with abuse.
Agitated? Please. You made a point which I sought clarification for. You claimed it a remarkable feat that Selwood cracked the Geelong side in his first year. The fact is that no matter how dominant the side is, to get a regular game you only have to be 22nd best (not saying that Selwood was 22nd btw)
Which player did Selwood keep out of the side in 2007 to make it a remarkable feat? I honestly can't think of anyone except Kane Tenace or David Johnson which is why I ask you since I believe you would remember the Cats' list of that year a lot better than me.
Spot on, with only the exceptions of Hawkins (9 games 1st year), Stokes (9), Tenace (14), Egan (15), Taylor (21), Mumford (3) and NAblett (4), Geelong's draft picks rarely played in their first years....Geelong at that time were very conservative when it came to giving games to drafted players, rarely giving games to young players in their first seasons at the club.
Spot on, with only the exceptions of Hawkins (9 games 1st year), Stokes (9), Tenace (14), Egan (15), Taylor (21), Mumford (3) and NAblett (4), Geelong's draft picks rarely played in their first years....
Compare that to Smedts (0, so far) and Guthrie (2) and Horlin Smith (0) and Schroder (0), it's pretty obvious that it was some draconian policy of Thompson's.
This is being massively exaggerated as the years go by, obviously because Thompson is now the big nasty bogey man.
Fact is, every year he was there he played first years more than Scott has (so far)
Or perhaps we can all just admit that it had more to do with the players themselves than anything else, that Spender/Thurley/Playfair probably weren't ready for games whereas Selwood/Stokes etc were, stop using it as some sort of evidence that Selwood broke down the Berlin wall all by himself, and move on?Where did I say the policy had changed? Egan, Taylor, Stokes, Mumford and Nathan Ablett were all more mature age players when drafted. Pretty selective evidence you've used there, bravo.
Why not list his contemporaries Djerrkura/Hogan/Varcoe/Prismall (0)
Or West/Blake/Spencer/Thurley/Lonergan/Mackie/Playfair (0)
Looking at the numbers I was surprised a little that the class of 2001 got as many games as they did, but Bartel/Kelly/SJ/Ablett all only played around a dozen games in their first season.
Or perhaps we can all just admit that it had more to do with the players themselves than anything else, that Spender/Thurley/Playfair probably weren't ready for games whereas Selwood/Stokes etc were, stop using it as some sort of evidence that Selwood broke down the Berlin wall all by himself, and move on?
Simon Goodwin said on the 14th July 2011
"I haven't seen a player come into the game and be able to playthe way he (Heppell) has played, his composure, the way he has trained and his attitude towards the game has been outstanding, he is a ver mature kid, I dont think I have seen anyone better or adapt to the game the way he has."
Pfft. What would Goodwin know?
I'd much rather hear the opinions of overweight keyboard warrior experts on Bigfooty who have never kicked a football in their lives and enjoy knocking 18 year old footballers in their first season. They carry much more worth.
SITTING down to interview Dyson Heppell it soon becomes clear the most obvious question is the one he can't answer.
How can it be that Essendon's star in the making was overlooked by four clubs in last November's national draft?
How can it be that in an era of psychological testing, countless physical examinations and interviews, he was not snapped up?
He is the bookies' favourite to win the Rising Star award, but growing speculation he could win the club's best-and-fairest in his first year embarrasses him.
I really hope he fails. Especially considering he plays for Essendon. I'm sure that would please some of the expert masses who have contributed in this thread so far.
It's hilarious that you're getting so pissy about this, just read some of your work in the St Kilda and Dogs September thread. There is some proper invective, some fine main board trolling on your part.
PS I couldn't give a flying **** about Essendon.
It's hilarious that you're getting so pissy about this, just read some of your work in the St Kilda and Dogs September thread. There is some proper invective, some fine main board trolling on your part.
PS I couldn't give a flying **** about Essendon.
You obviously give a flying **** about Heppell tho,dont ya troll
My understanding is that he is now firmly on the GWS radar and they will table a mega deal for him.
Hope he stays with the Bombers.
My understanding is that he is now firmly on the GWS radar and they will table a mega deal for him.
Hope he stays with the Bombers.
Signed a 1 year extension about 5 weeks ago so granites till 2013
My understanding is that he is now firmly on the GWS radar and they will table a mega deal for him.
Hope he stays with the Bombers.
Barracked for Essendon since he was a kid. Guy loves the bombers (Used to know people who knew him).
He won't go to GWS unless he gets offered a scully like deal.