- Apr 2, 2013
- 11,947
- 18,336
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Yes only those who are playing should be selectedPerhaps he is a realistic chance of playing.
Did you think of that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes only those who are playing should be selectedPerhaps he is a realistic chance of playing.
Did you think of that?
You still need reserves though.Yes only those who are playing should be selected
Not arguable at all. Clear No.3 offie in the country.Rocchiccioli? Arguably number two but another right arm offie unfortunately.
Yes only those who are playing should be selected
I like the idea of using different players in each test.Could see this for the first test:-
Khawaja
Head
Labuschange
Smith
McSweeney/Konstas
Webster
Carey
Starc
Lyon
Boland
Kuhnemann
Second test:-
Kwahaja
Head
Labuschange
Smith
McSweeney/Konstas
Webster
Connelly
Carey
Boland/Starc (only playing 1 quick)
Lyon
Kuhnemann
Call me old fashioned but we might want to see the deck before we select the team.
I like the idea of using different players in each test.
1st Test
1 Head
2 Konstas
3 Labuschagne
4 Smith
5 McSweeney
6 Webster
7 Carey
8 Starc
9 Lyon
10 Kuhnemann
11 Boland
2 main spinners & 4 part-time spinners should be plenty.
2nd test swap Lyon for Murphy as both needed to bowl plenty of overs. Would also bring in Connolly in the 2nd test.
Given we have already made the ICC World Championship & needing to turnover our team over the next couple of years... we should be using it as an opportunity to try new players.They'll go with Uzzie not Konstas IMO, but otherwise I reckon that's the side that will roll out.
I doubt Lyon would get swapped out at this stage of his career.
Given we have already made the ICC World Championship & needing to turnover our team over the next couple of years... we should be using it as an opportunity to try new players.
We should absolutely be giving Murphy more opportunities, given we may need him to takeover Lyon soon, so imo should get at least 1 test.
Also, Konstas not Khawaja is the future, so should play at least 1 test to appreciate subcontinent conditions.
I said at the time Marsh should have been replaced by Webster for the 2nd Adelaide Test, given he couldn't bowl.What we could or should do and what we will do are two different things. Whether we like it or not the results say our selectors do a decent job.
I was talking about Connelly, as was Tugga.K
Swepson really went to that next level when he barely played a game for 2 years to run gloves
I like the idea of using different players in each test.
1st Test
1 Head
2 Konstas
3 Labuschagne
4 Smith
5 McSweeney
6 Webster
7 Carey
8 Starc
9 Lyon
10 Kuhnemann
11 Boland
2 main spinners & 4 part-time spinners should be plenty.
2nd test swap Lyon for Murphy as both needed to bowl plenty of overs. Would also bring in Connolly in the 2nd test.
They may not have gotten everything right but i think they did a solid job. Made the tough but correct choice with Konstas before the MCG. Probably should have pulled the trigger earlier with Webster but did it in the end.I said at the time Marsh should have been replaced by Webster for the 2nd Adelaide Test, given he couldn't bowl.
The selectors waited til the final test. Had they failed to make that change, we likely would have drawn the series. Bumrah getting injured may have saved us too.
The big issue with continuing with Marsh is it put an extra workload on the other bowlers. Hazelwood broke down & Starc struggled towards the end too.
Yes we may have won the series, but we got a little lucky & by no means did the selectors get everything right.
We have a very old team & we need to make changes over the next couple of years & this tour is a great opportunity to try some new things.