- Aug 17, 2014
- 6,524
- 4,452
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Not a fan of overseas teams.....
Disagree.He became a walking disaster area.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Disagree.He became a walking disaster area.
Because the board didn't want to spend 500k on a report on the basis of a drug cheat who has threatened to sue both clubs he's been apart of, but with H's media connections something had to be done so the club chose to include the entire community, it isn't hard to understand, you choose not too though IMO, and remember Chief, H wanted no part of it, until he thought it could benefit him of course.Why would Eddie lie when he could just tell the truth, which was there in black and white in the very report he was making a public statement about?
Incredibly poor judgement. That’s why he was asked/made to walk earlier than planned.
Simple as that.
What came back to bite him was the enemies he made over the years being outspoken, they used this crap to bombard him to get him out. any sane person knows he didn't mean it was a great day for his club because he was proud of it, he mentioned he was proud of it meaning its now out and they can address it, now the findings are out.On what basis?
What came back to bite him was the enemies he made over the years being outspoken, they used this crap to bombard him to get him out. any sane person knows he didn't mean it was a great day for his club because he was proud of it, he mentioned he was proud of it meaning its now out and they can address it, now the findings are out.
About this "ignore" function, is it possible to unread your publications? Asking for a friend.He also said they're not racist and wanted to take the heat out of the race debate.
Those aren't words of someone addressing it, they're actually words of someone NOT addressing it.
Remember on his exit speech when he had nothing more to lose and still he did not apologise? I guess he still thought he had something more to lose but that's typical behaviour of a narcissist.
I Don't believe he is raciest, i think he knows its all been blown up to be something its not , but coming out and saying that, would give people like you a reason to say he is a raciest.He also said they're not racist and wanted to take the heat out of the race debate.
Those aren't words of someone addressing it, they're actually words of someone NOT addressing it.
Remember on his exit speech when he had nothing more to lose and still he did not apologise? I guess he still thought he had something more to lose but that's typical behaviour of a narcissist.
I Don't believe he is raciest, i think he knows its all been blown up to be something its not , but coming out and saying that, would give people like you a reason to say he is a raciest.
there are a lot of double standards with regards to racism.
Mate some people just choose to believe the worst in people, the person they choose to believe in this case is a drug cheat who has threatened to sue both AFL he's been apart of, his word is gospel.I Don't believe he is raciest, i think he knows its all been blown up to be something its not , but coming out and saying that, would give people like you a reason to say he is a raciest.
there are a lot of double standards with regards to racism.
Throw away lines you say?Don't forget Treloar. Maybe if FIGJAM knew about team he may have a premiership to his name.
The report was called off the back of H's allegations.
He also threatened to sue the Melbourne football club too.
Also, i don't think my second point is irrelevant at all.
What came back to bite him was the enemies he made over the years being outspoken, they used this crap to bombard him to get him out. any sane person knows he didn't mean it was a great day for his club because he was proud of it, he mentioned he was proud of it meaning its now out and they can address it, now the findings are out.
Remarkably just days before their own AGM, it's called the plan of last resort.They didn't put the report out, it leaked.
It hasn't.
It's certainly not detailed by the report, which doesn't really detail anything. Honestly, have you read it?
One example? Wouldn't it be more accurate to say this is the entire argument?
That aside, how far can we verify this account of events? The report certainly doesn't do that.
That aside, I accept Lumumba was treatly unfairly. The club should have handled it better. But is this systemic racism? Or an individual failure of governance/leadership?
Assuming that's what happened, how does that demonstrate "systemic racism" as opposed to an individual failure of governance?It is systemic because it shows there were no avenues for individuals within the club to address these issues and when they were raised informally the individuals were subject to victimisation and a public smear campaign.
Do you want to lower the bar any further? This isn't a balanced approach.For something to be systemic it doesn't have to be a constantly recurring situation. One example is sufficient to identify systemic issues.
What came back to bite him was the enemies he made over the years being outspoken, they used this crap to bombard him to get him out. any sane person knows he didn't mean it was a great day for his club because he was proud of it, he mentioned he was proud of it meaning its now out and they can address it, now the findings are out.
Mate some people just choose to believe the worst in people, the person they choose to believe in this case is a drug cheat who has threatened to sue both AFL he's been apart of, his word is gospel.
Assuming that's what happened, how does that demonstrate "systemic racism" as opposed to an individual failure of governance?
Do you want to lower the bar any further?
A systemic problem is a problem due to issues inherent in the overall system, rather than due to a specific, individual, isolated factor. Contrast with pilot error, user error, or mistake.
A change to the structure, organization or policies in that system could alleviate the systemic problem.
Yeah that must be it. I don't understand what words mean. Let's see how that works out for you.I don't think you understand what a systemic issue is which is where the confusion comes in;
You keep asserting things without bothering to demonstrate anything. It's inadequate."A systemic problem is a problem due to issues inherent in the overall system"
Systemic problem - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
One example is sufficient to identify a systemic problem.
Admitted to using magic mushrooms whilst playing for Collingwood.Drug cheat?
A cheat is a person who's actions are for an unfair advantage. In what way is taking mushies cheating?Admitted to using magic mushrooms whilst playing for Collingwood.
Admitted to using magic mushrooms whilst playing for Collingwood.
Yeah why not.Do you call Dane Swan a drug cheat?