- Sep 20, 2010
- 1,684
- 4,447
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Is he still going to tolerate Danica Patrick and her lizard people theories????
Society/Culture Elon Musk - Takeover of Twitter?
- Thread starter BigFootyNews
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Is he still going to tolerate Danica Patrick and her lizard people theories????
- Sep 21, 2009
- 17,895
- 16,328
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
When Zuckerberg was telling people that Biden didn't threaten him, or whatever.
'The right': We don't believe him.
'The left': We don't give a shit what he says. His platform is one of the largest spreaders of hate and misinformation in the world. We will look at the available information to ascertain if Governments are unfairly censoring information.
Then Zuckerberg comes out after Trump threatens him, and says 'oh yeah, nah, Biden totally did all the stuff MAGA claimed! Even though there was no evidence of it, repeatedly through all the Comer, Gym Jordan et al inquiries into it.'.
'The right': We do believe him.
'The left': We don't give a shit what he says. His platform is one of the largest spreaders of hate and misinformation in the world. We will look at the available information to ascertain if Governments are unfairly censoring information.
You don't just believe information if it suits your pre-existing position.
Verify it, look into it.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/28/trump-zuckerberg-election-book-00176639
08/28/202
You lot tend to be happy to use Yahoo news as a source.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-mark-zuckerberg-probably-183657744.html
We're all supposed to believe it was actually Biden who was threatening him??!??
No evidence to support it, not a single investigation or inquiry found any evidence to support it, for years.
Trump literally threatening Zuckerberg, and Zuckerberg suddenly agreeing and fully supporting Trump. Actual verbal and written evidence, directly from Trump himself...
Actual evidence.
Just apply the most basic levels of critical analysis and comprehension.
'The right': We don't believe him.
'The left': We don't give a shit what he says. His platform is one of the largest spreaders of hate and misinformation in the world. We will look at the available information to ascertain if Governments are unfairly censoring information.
Then Zuckerberg comes out after Trump threatens him, and says 'oh yeah, nah, Biden totally did all the stuff MAGA claimed! Even though there was no evidence of it, repeatedly through all the Comer, Gym Jordan et al inquiries into it.'.
'The right': We do believe him.
'The left': We don't give a shit what he says. His platform is one of the largest spreaders of hate and misinformation in the world. We will look at the available information to ascertain if Governments are unfairly censoring information.
You don't just believe information if it suits your pre-existing position.
Verify it, look into it.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/28/trump-zuckerberg-election-book-00176639
08/28/202
“ELECTION FRAUDSTERS at levels never seen before, and they will be sent to prison for long periods of time. We already know who you are. DON’T DO IT! ZUCKERBUCKS, be careful!”
-Trump.
You lot tend to be happy to use Yahoo news as a source.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-mark-zuckerberg-probably-183657744.html
Trump, who previously threatened Zuckerberg with life in prison, said his comments might have led to the announcement.
"Probably," Trump said when asked if Zuckerberg is "directly responding to the threats you've made to him in the past."
We're all supposed to believe it was actually Biden who was threatening him??!??
No evidence to support it, not a single investigation or inquiry found any evidence to support it, for years.
It must be true. We cannot have Presidents or Governments threatening or having any control over social media 'the digital town square'.
THEN...Trump literally threatening Zuckerberg, and Zuckerberg suddenly agreeing and fully supporting Trump. Actual verbal and written evidence, directly from Trump himself...
Actual evidence.
Well, that's just good.
What's the problem?
Just apply the most basic levels of critical analysis and comprehension.
