- Aug 21, 2016
- 15,844
- 25,212
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Oldham
City probably a bit fortunate. Forest could have scored two or three. Quality finishes by Gvardiol and Haaland though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 10
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
"But Haaland is s**t"
Got lucky with the own goal but their goal by the letter of the law is offside and I do think the penalty call before Sakas goal wasn’t there from the replays I can see.
Managed to hold on through a silly Raya mistake and a definite one which they wouldn’t have got (which is crazy considering Oliver was right there) unless VAR intervened
That was never a penalty for me, not from the replays I’ve seen.
Yes because you're a Gooner lol. If that happened to Saka in the 86th minute and you needed it to win the game and maintain the title charge it would be a disgrace and a stonewall pen.
It was soft but so is the majority of penalties. Trossard lightly kicked the back of Kulus leg
Yes because you're a Gooner lol. If that happened to Saka in the 86th minute and you needed it to win the game and maintain the title charge it would be a disgrace and a stonewall pen.
It was soft but so is the majority of penalties. Trossard lightly kicked the back of Kulus leg
I'm not blaming the ref though spurs defended two corners like morons aswell I just think it's funny that people can't put bias aside watching penalty calls.Are we allowed to talk about referee decisions now? Has the ban been lifted?
The one where he tried to step over a few times into the box? I thought it was at first but on replay there was nothing in it.I think the Kulu one was a penalty but whatever not gonna cry over it. Just compounded by them scoring directly from it aswell. Potentially a 2 goal swing off that decision which is the game.
Nah that was Maddison that wasn't a penalty clean tackle by whoever it was. It was Kulu just before it and trossard went across the back of his legs gently and tripped him up.The one where he tried to step over a few times into the box? I thought it was at first but on replay there was nothing in it.
I just think it's funny that people can't put bias aside watching penalty calls.
Ohh my bad lol I didn't realise fouls only count if the balls close. Play on then!
Tangle of legs between two players nowhere near the ball, move on mate.
It's two players running past each other getting their feet tangled. It wouldn't be called a foul anywhere else on the pitch, and wasn't called a foul upon VAR review. Cope and seethe.Ohh my bad lol I didn't realise fouls only count if the balls close. Play on then!
Neither coping nor seething big fella but you're weirdly defensive for something that's so clean cut. The old protesting too much I reckon..It's two players running past each other getting their feet tangled. It wouldn't be called a foul anywhere else on the pitch, and wasn't called a foul upon VAR review. Cope and seethe.
Neither coping nor seething big fella but you're weirdly defensive for something that's so clean cut. The old protesting too much I reckon..
That's ok you keep defending it hard though and maybe they'll just keep the decision!Probably because you keep bringing it up every 2nd post
That's ok you keep defending it hard though and maybe they'll just keep the decision!
Yeah i think they will keep the decision.
Maddisons been s**t second half of the season no doubtIt wasn’t a wrong decision and I think it’s right VAR stayed out of it. Just like if it was given on the field I don’t think they get involved. Neither would be a clear and obvious error. If I’m spurs I’m more dirty at Maddison for his poor dive straight after. Gave it away cheaply with 2 spurs players now on the deck and gave Arsenal all the time in the world to counter.
Maddisons been s**t second half of the season no doubt