Apparently Clayton didn’t really care about the off field side (what their home life was like, how self-motivated they were) and more or less picked on raw talent, which he was quite good at.Haha it was Andrejs Everitt over Riewoldt. That was horrible at the time. I remember being staggered.
Scott Clayton, wowee.
Meant we had some outrageously talented individuals but some extremely flakey ones. Grant and Everitt (and Hill, McMahon, Walsh and god knows how many others) had obvious ability but flakey intensity.
Riewoldt was never as highly rated as his cousin but (dummy spits aside) he had a real never-say-die attitude, was strong one on one and definitely got the best out of himself over his career.
Most of the above were the opposite. Extremely high skill level but not great one on one and never fulfilled their potential.