Preview Geelong v Port Adelaide Rd 13....somewhere...sometime soon...maybe

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't really buy the argument that there's no room in the midfield, therefore Narkle had to be dropped. Isn't Scott constantly banging on about how flexible the side is? You have a young bloke in the form of his life - rejig the side a little and keep him in.

Higgins out; Narkle, Parfitt and Menegola to fill his role.

Atkins or Bews out; O'Connor to fill the role. Parfitt to play more defensive in the midfield if need be.

Or my preferred option - Dahlhaus out; Narkle and Parfitt to float through if we need some zip and tackling pressure, or Atkins if we want someone invisible. Put the onus on Close to help with whatever it is Dahlhaus does.

That's after giving it about 3 seconds thought, so there's probably something I've missed there. But still. Flexibility!

As for Ratugolea - I didn't really mind seeing them give him a crack in the ruck. It's not like Stanley has been setting the world on fire for most of the year, though I think Fort deserved a chance before Sav.

Sav seems to have lost his spring and his game relies on that a lot. How long ago was the leg break? Perhaps still affecting him. The role they're playing him in is confusing as well. Seems to be similar to Stanley last year i.e. take the centre bounce then float forward. Problem is, Sav seems to have lost his spring. He's no good taking the centre bounces if he can't jump on the other blokes head. He doesn't have much else as a ruckman. His follow up work in there has been great though, credit where it's due.

Also, it made sense to run with Stanley in that role there last year because we had no 2nd tall forward. We got Jeremy bloody Cameron up there now, we don't need Sav floating around there to crash packs because, though his marks aren't really sticking yet, Cameron is pretty damn good at splitting packs himself.

I really wish they would hurry up and bring Fort in for a month so we can get this annual ruck dance out of the way nice and early, rather than right before finals. You know the one, Stanley has one or two of his really bad, bad Rhys days (in between beating/smashing the game's premier ruckmen, of course. Classic Stanley), everyone cracks the shits with Stanley and he gets dropped.

Then a month later we remember. Oh that's right! We still don't have anyone better in the ruck than Stanley, flawed as he is.
 
not a fan of 2021 Higgins, so far, but maybe his smarts and his work at training elevates him in the eyes of the MC.
He better than I expected but I expected nothing. His good passages have been quite attacking with ball movement.

Still, I came here to make enraged comment about a good young player being dropped not to be talked into rational sense so I'll see myself out good sir
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Very harsh to drop Narkle... Wonder what the MC reasoning is - he seemed to be hitting his straps with more responsibility on his shoulders.
he will play, almost certainly, or he's a bit injured
 
Would've dropped a defender for O'Connor. Hasn't played since round 6, play in a back pocket on one of Port's dangerous forwards and keep Narkle in the guts while he's playing the best football of his life. MC demand flexibility from players but show zero themselves - if we get smashed in the middle there's nowhere to hide for our fearless leaders.
 
Selections reflect MC’s consist strategy of picking to the preferred structure and roles. The two big problems here -

- going in with 4 players perhaps lacking match condition against a good side in their deck.
-omitting one of the two inform mid field players (Parfitt being the other).


There is the side issue of Narkle walking. Was always going to be a risk once they recruited Higgins and also had to resign Cuthrie this year. Understand their thinking but don’t agree - is indeed going to be a problem if
 
Would've dropped a defender for O'Connor. Hasn't played since round 6, play in a back pocket on one of Port's dangerous forwards and keep Narkle in the guts while he's playing the best football of his life. MC demand flexibility from players but show zero themselves - if we get smashed in the middle there's nowhere to hide for our fearless leaders.

I would have dropped bews or atkins put moc back and kept narkle too but i think mc really want moc as a defensive mid and thats pushed narkle out.
 
Terrible match committee decisions this week.

Stanley should play ahead of Sav based on recent performances.

The decision to drop Narkle is the most infuriating MC call of this season.

He will rightly leave the club and we will have no idea of what he may have been able to achieve at senior level. Crazy!

Why not drop Dahlhaus and play Danger half forward?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
no It isn’t. Blicavs wasn’t near those players in 2018.
Well you would know🙄 It’s a pity you aren’t on the MC yourself.
I suppose they conspired at the start of the season to make sure
Blicsavs was going to get more votes than the others on a weekly
basis. OMG, save us!
 
Melts incoming. The fact is, good players are going to start to miss out. Players who aren’t even playing badly are going to miss out. It’s good for the team.

Probably five this week (by the sounds of it) and then possibly Miers next week. It gets hard after the first few to find 6-7 who don’t deserve a spot.



Good point. Back in say 2009 who were the players that yo yo’d on the margins in and out of the team?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Terrible match committee decisions this week.

Stanley should play ahead of Sav based on recent performances.

The decision to drop Narkle is the most infuriating MC call of this season.

He will rightly leave the club and we will have no idea of what he may have been able to achieve at senior level. Crazy!

Why not drop Dahlhaus and play Danger half forward?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Settle petal,Narkle knows he's valued. Just not as much as four quality ins.
Can't believe how apeshit everyone is going considering he was unremarkable only four weeks ago.
Yes he's been good but one swallow does not a summer make, he'll get his run.
 
Selections reflect MC’s consist strategy of picking to the preferred structure and roles. The two big problems here -

- going in with 4 players perhaps lacking match condition against a good side in their deck.
-omitting one of the two inform mid field players (Parfitt being the other).


There is the side issue of Narkle walking. Was always going to be a risk once they recruited Higgins and also had to resign Cuthrie this year. Understand their thinking but don’t agree - is indeed going to be a problem if
Again, Blicavs and Duncan have only missed one game, they aren't lacking match conditioning.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Again, Blicavs and Duncan have only missed one game, they aren't lacking match conditioning.
Danger though has lost enough games that he's going to need to play forward around half a match. It's he pushing Higgins or Dahlhaus to the midfield during that time? Surely Narkle is the better rotation for him.
 
Settle petal,Narkle knows he's valued. Just not as much as four quality ins.
Can't believe how apeshit everyone is going considering he was unremarkable only four weeks ago.
Yes he's been good but one swallow does not a summer make, he'll get his run.
There is 22 players just been put ahead of narkle. Not 4. Including menegola, Higgins, dalhaus, atkins whose form isn’t near narkles. oconnor has also not played as well as narkle has in the midfield and hasn’t played in 6 weeks.
 
Settle petal,Narkle knows he's valued. Just not as much as four quality ins.
Can't believe how apeshit everyone is going considering he was unremarkable only four weeks ago.
Yes he's been good but one swallow does not a summer make, he'll get his run.
I’d consider Shaun Higgins’ form with us unremarkable.
 
There is 22 players just been put ahead of narkle. Not 4. Including menegola, Higgins, dalhaus, atkins whose form isn’t near narkles. oconnor has also not played as well as narkle has in the midfield and hasn’t played in 6 weeks.

Before he got injured O'Connor was killing it in the shutdown run with role so much so that even the afl media were praising him and hyping him up, its unfortunate that Narkle misses out but this was always going to happen when all these injured players came back
 
Good point. Back in say 2009 who were the players that yo yo’d on the margins in and out of the team?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
2007 GF emergencies were Varcoe, Prismall Gardiner.

2008 GF emergencies were Wojcinski, Byrnes and Gamble.

2009 GF emergencies were Mumford, Stokes and Hogan.

2011 GF emergencies were Byrnes, Milburn and Guthrie

Premiership teams have unlucky players.








Yes I know we didn’t win 08. Don’t remind me or I will end you.
 
2007 GF emergencies were Varcoe, Prismall Gardiner.

2008 GF emergencies were Wojcinski, Byrnes and Gamble.

2009 GF emergencies were Mumford, Stokes and Hogan.

2011 GF emergencies were Byrnes, Milburn and Guthrie

Premiership teams have unlucky players.








Yes I know we didn’t win 08. Don’t remind me or I will end you.

Milburn an emergency in 2011? Forgot that. I think of him as a 3x flag player.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top