Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And again from todays updated phantom order from the no1 draft guru cal twomneyWe could flip that and just highlight how much you’ve sooked it up when few have agreed with your opinion. You’ve then bombarded this thread with same statement over and over with no supporting articles or links. You’re no longer worth debating this topic with as you bring nothing new to it.
Just change your user name from geelong_crazy26 to richmond_triggered171920 and be done with it. You’ve only embarrassed yourself in this thread, and firmly outed yourself as a troll.
Again dramatic emotional stuff. If anyone is angry over the use of the word unanimous or general consensus on a footy forum I think they need to get a life or calm their nerves.I think the only thing making people angry and I'm including any objective and prob a few Geelong posters - is not the obvious baiting/trolling but that you still dont seem to have a grasp on the word 'unanimous' and now 'consensus' - the number 1 pick is very debatable and Ashcroft is in that debate definitely. You nearly got there with 'widely help opinion'. As I mentioned earlier I think he is number one slightly ahead of the others but it is def not a consensus.
I'm just coming back to this thread because its hilarious how you keep going on about it but still dont really understand the words you're using
So who are you guys looking at with the no2 pick?? The incredibly bean pole like jagga smith?? The vanilla pudding in fin o Sullivan?? The cam rayner mk2 in Sam lailor??But he's not, and it is not.
Talk about dramatic people. All you have to say is they aren’t drafting the best player in the pool and it’s hysteria. I literally had a guy take the time and effort to insert about 10 of my posts back to me in this giant rant.Is it a logical response to call him a liar because you don't agree with him, and me a troll because I don't support Richmond? Because that's what you're doing over and over again lol, I can just imagine how raw your fingertips are. Also look up what cope means because you clearly don't know
I’m going to start calling you Herpes, because you just don’t go away.And again from todays updated phantom order from the no1 draft guru cal twomney
View attachment 2150544
Here again with the emotions and insults. same reason daicos went pick no 4 while being the clear standout of the crop, because he is a F/S pick and teams have shown a reluctance to go F/S or academy picks with the first choice. Not very good reasoning skills if you can’t work that outI’m going to start calling you Herpes, because you just don’t go away.
But am I meant to be surprised that Cal Twomey didn’t change his mind? So this really isn’t new evidence.
As for Ashcroft being a clear pick #1 I don’t think draft guru Cal Twomey actually agrees with you. If he did, why would he say what he does about FOS?
View attachment 2150552
Thanks for playing Herpes.
You’re not very good at this HSV-2, are you? You tie yourself in a knot one way and then find yourself having to untie the same knot.Here again with the emotions and insults. same reason daicos went pick no 4 while being the clear standout of the crop, because he is a F/S pick and teams have shown a reluctance to go F/S or academy picks with the first choice. Not very good reasoning skills if you can’t work that out
Poor interpretation skills. His phantom rankings are based on where he believes they rank, when he is talking about the “no1 pick” contender he is referring to actual draft position. You need to work on your comprehension. Why would he change it up with no football left to play??You’re not very good at this HSV-2, are you? You tie yourself in a knot one way and then find yourself having to untie the same knot.
Suggestion… read more than the lines you want to read, dig a bit deeper. If you had you’d have read the below about it not being a mock draft and F-S, and also that Finn O’Sullivan “started the season as a number 1 pick contender and remains it at the end”.
You’ve also pinned a lot on Cal Twomey. You’ll look real silly if he changes the rankings up next month. Another knot for you to untie.
Just. Stop. Embarrassing. Yourself.
View attachment 2150592
Is he though? He is clearly ranking the individuals not taking into account F-S and Academy bids and, importantly, “is not predicting where the players will fall”.Poor interpretation skills. His phantom rankings are based on where he believes they rank, when he is talking about the “no1 pick” contender he is referring to actual draft position. You need to work on your comprehension. Why would he change it up with no football left to play??
You are not doing very well here and really getting overly emotional. Take a rest from it
Yes, when he said Fin osullivan started the season as the no1 pick contender he clearly meant to be drafted. I imagine he still is in contention. It’s not rocket science to interpret what pick no1 contention means.Is he though? He is clearly ranking the individuals not taking into account F-S and Academy bids and, importantly, “is not predicting where the players will fall”.
Regardless, you’ve got more riding on Cal not changing it up than I have HSV-2. If he does I don’t think that’s a knot you can untie.
You are not doing very well here and really getting overly triggered. Take a rest from it.
I’m guessing whenever you feel an argument slipping away on this forum you revert to calling posters emotional, and questioning their intellect (comprehension, reading, IQ). That’s your playbook, right? It reminds me of Donald Trump and his MAGA acolytes.Yes, when he said Fin osullivan started the season as the no1 pick contender he clearly meant to be drafted. I imagine he still is in contention. It’s not rocket science to interpret what pick no1 contention means.
Again nobody is changing an order based off power rankings when the players are no longer playing footy. Comprehension and reasoning doesn’t seem to be your strong suit
About time you posted a comment that was well thought out and not a piss take.So who are you guys looking at with the no2 pick?? The incredibly bean pole like jagga smith?? The vanilla pudding in fin o Sullivan?? The cam rayner mk2 in Sam lailor??
Careful, he sounds very much like a Trump man after his line about 'the very incompetent Kamela,' might explain a bit.I’m guessing whenever you feel an argument slipping away on this forum you revert to calling posters emotional, and questioning their intellect (comprehension, reading, IQ). That’s your playbook, right? It reminds me of Donald Trump and his MAGA acolytes.
You can interpret Cal’s power rankings however you want. He had FOS as a pick #1 contender at the start of the year, before seeing 2024 form or F-S/Academy commitments, and still does at the end of the year.
If he’s not considering changes why would he even bother publishing another?
McIntosh next to goCumberland delisted. Turns out it wasn't a coaching conspiracy keeping him out of the team
The only one who reverts to name calling is yourself, you have spent several pages calling me herpes. So to claim someone else is throwing insults is bizzare and poor self reflection. You are modeling the behavior you are acusing others of.I’m guessing whenever you feel an argument slipping away on this forum you revert to calling posters emotional, and questioning their intellect (comprehension, reading, IQ). That’s your playbook, right? It reminds me of Donald Trump and his MAGA acolytes.
You can interpret Cal’s power rankings however you want. He had FOS as a pick #1 contender at the start of the year, before seeing 2024 form or F-S/Academy commitments, and still does at the end of the year.
If he’s not considering changes why would he even bother publishing another?
Calling you Herpes wasn’t name calling. I was drawing an analogy… both you and herpes don’t go away.The only one who reverts to name calling is yourself, you have spent several pages calling me herpes. So to claim someone else is throwing insults is bizzare and poor self reflection. You are modeling the behavior you are acusing others of.
I stated you displayed very poor logical skills which is correct, you were and still are struggling to work out and comprehend what no1 pick contender means.
Cal updated his board this month on the back of the national combine results. Any changes from here till next month will most likely be subtle and based off player interviews as that is all there is left. Again just use your reasoning skills to work things out. There won’t be any drastic changes because there isn’t anything left to play out besides a few minor off field things. Levi isn’t budging from no1 on the power ranking slot.
I think I am dealing with a lost cause here. Critical thinking and logic are your clear weak points and a bit cringe worthy even with the highlighted above and previous posts where you struggle to understand what someone is talking about when discussing the no1 draft pick. It’s a little concerning tbh. I honestly don’t know you from a stick on the ground so I feel a bit mean at this point probing this further. Even your Richmond trolls aren’t clicking the like buttons anymore.Calling you Herpes wasn’t name calling. I was drawing an analogy… both you and herpes don’t go away.
Unfortunately your black and white thinking, amply displayed in this thread, hasn’t allowed you to see that.
I spent about three pages trying to help a Richmond supporter work out what cal twomney means when he says “ Finn o’Sullivan is a number one draft pick contender”. If anything mate I probably should be getting an Employment package as a teaching aid in here for people of this IQ level.
Made me laugh. What show is this from?
You've never seen The Office?Made me laugh. What show is this from?
Actually havent. Missing out?You've never seen The Office?
You've never seen The Office?
so it'll be a while till you watch the Aussie one then?
If you like The Office DO NOT WATCH THE AUS VERSION - its cringe for all the wrong reasonsI would rather watch the sex and the city spin off on repeat than have to sit through the Australian office for five consecutive seconds