- Oct 14, 2011
- 9,668
- 13,505
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Matthew Richardson showing his professionalism
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Totally agree. When the game is in the balance in the 3rd qtr some of the frees were paid were bafflingThey’ll get flogged next week if the umpiring is half decent. They just don’t use the ball well enough
No, it's not irrelevant.
They will decide if he was 'going for the ball' or if he 'chose to bump'. If they decide he was going for the ball, no charge; if they decide he chose to bump, he's in trouble
If going for the ball was irrelevant, every time someone copped a knock to the head in a marking contest, it would be a report
Matthew Richardson showing his professionalism
They’ll get flogged next week if the umpiring is half decent. They just don’t use the ball well enough
Why you cannot go at least one day without personally attacking another poster to try to make a point is beyond meSo? Cotchin was going for the ball, and Shiels was too, an accident happened. Boo Hoo. Move on.
You're not a smart poster so please don't respond until you've taken the bias out of your posting.
No when your paid to be apart of the coverage you should be 100% partialLike when Dermie was in tears in the coverage after the 2014 grand final? Come on, let him be happy.
Yep, they'll factor that in, although they haven't clearly defined what 'duty of care' means in a sport where potentially injuring collisions are part and parcel of every moment of the sport.Cotchin has a duty of care going for the ball, the fact he collected Shiels in the head and did not play any further part in the game does not look good.
No when your paid to be apart of the coverage you should be 100% partial
ThisFor all the number one draft picks there skill level is below par when put under pressure........
No, it's not irrelevant.
They will decide if he was 'going for the ball' or if he 'chose to bump'. If they decide he was going for the ball, no charge; if they decide he chose to bump, he's in trouble
If going for the ball was irrelevant, every time someone copped a knock to the head in a marking contest, it would be a report
Yep, they'll factor that in, although they haven't clearly defined what 'duty of care' means in a sport where potentially injuring collisions are part and parcel of every moment of the sport.
It's this grey area of duty of care which enable them to give Ziebell a couple of weeks when they want, but let Cotchin play, because ...you know...Tiges and everything
That attitude exactly why sport commentary in the country is crap.If you want to be a joyless campaigner about it - sure. Personally I like seeing character and personality in footy. It was after the siren, so who cares.
Speaking of DangerfieldTo me, he's clearly better than Dangerfield.
That attitude exactly why sport commentary in the country is crap.