I noticed that too. About time!On a positive note, there is another rule change that stops Duckwood getting frees.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I noticed that too. About time!On a positive note, there is another rule change that stops Duckwood getting frees.
I was going to wait till the new year before firing another shot at the afl but here we go again. Banning the third man up in ruck play
is surely one of the more stupid decisions they have made. Why should the rucks be protected ?, if they took a run and jump at the ball
instead of wrestling and holding each other, there would be no third man up. As it is they are sitting ducks under the ball and it makes
plenty of sense for a third man to contest to a team's advantage. How about when the ball is kicked to chf, only the chf and chb are allowed
to compete for the mark or only the fullback can kick out after a behind -this is similar and how stupid does it sound?
So next year we play 4 ruck men - McEvoy, Fitzy, Roughie and Hodgey or will there be a new rule stating only 2 ruck men can play?
We should have expected it, an afl decision against a successful Hawthorn initiative.
lol, Adam Simpson (North player) says hi...a successful Hawthorn initiative.
I see now why we traded Lewis for peanutsI was going to wait till the new year before firing another shot at the afl but here we go again. Banning the third man up in ruck play
is surely one of the more stupid decisions they have made. Why should the rucks be protected ?, if they took a run and jump at the ball
instead of wrestling and holding each other, there would be no third man up. As it is they are sitting ducks under the ball and it makes
plenty of sense for a third man to contest to a team's advantage. How about when the ball is kicked to chf, only the chf and chb are allowed
to compete for the mark or only the fullback can kick out after a behind -this is similar and how stupid does it sound?
So next year we play 4 ruck men - McEvoy, Fitzy, Roughie and Hodgey or will there be a new rule stating only 2 ruck men can play?
We should have expected it, an afl decision against a successful Hawthorn initiative.
I'll believe it when I see it. I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if Selwood continues to get away with it somehow.On a positive note, there is another rule change that stops Duckwood getting frees.
I'll believe it when I see it. I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if Selwood continues to get away with it somehow.
That Riley Milne looks a player. After debuting in 2009 I'm Very confident he will become the big bodied midfielder we are looking for
The AFLs explanation for the 3rd man rule baffles me.
I know Adam Simpson played at north a long time ago, what is your point?lol, Adam Simpson (North player) says hi
He regularly went third man up in the 90's/early 2000'sI know Adam Simpson played at north a long time ago, what is your point?
Because the inept afl need to protect the ruckmen who tap it mostly down to their feet causing more congestion due to typical afl coach's negative tactics. What is more of a joke is the afl consulting coaches about rule changes, that is the same people trying to break them - work that out.The AFLs explanation for the 3rd man rule baffles me.
They say the 3rd man up doesn't influence the clearances based on stats. Then why the need to ban it?
Is it just coincidence that the last 4 premierships were won by teams employing this tactic and don't have an elite ruckman?
As good as that is, I'll be more glad to see the end of the bullshit frees Toby McLean gets. That guy's a bigger cheat than Selwood!On a positive note, there is another rule change that stops Duckwood getting frees.
Next they'll make Gibbo redundant by banning the 3rd defender from entering the marking contest...
Package him up with Burger Jnr & Hodge - can push for a Pick in the late 70's.So we should look to trade him next year for pick 90.