Bluelegs
Digging into the why
I don’t get how this works.
If Pert is reviewed as part of the board review (as the executive manager approved by the Directors) and they decide he isn’t good enough then there you go. He goes.
But if they did decide that, they also get a footy department review spearheaded by the guy that wasn’t good enough. So what is that then worth?
The whole lot is bullshit. Two weeks ago we had a president and CEO firmly saying that no review is needed. That was on the nose with members and media, so the president steps down and suddenly we are having a review. And one of the reviewers, Pert, said publicly that a review isn’t needed.
Promising stuff.