List Mgmt. Gibbs - 2017 Trade Discussions! V2.0

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
If we give up more than one solitary pick for Gibbs we need to sack our list management committee starting with Roo.
If we are prepared to give 2 picks this year why the f##k didn't we do it last year.

Giving 2 picks this year would suggest our list management committee has NFI.
Signing menzel on apparently 400k demonstrates that.
 
If we give up more than one solitary pick for Gibbs we need to sack our list management committee starting with Roo.
If we are prepared to give 2 picks this year why the f##k didn't we do it last year.

Giving 2 picks this year would suggest our list management committee has NFI.
Depends what the picks are. A 1st and a 3rd is hardly folding when they've been asking for two firsts since day dot.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Then they can give 12 to Brisbane for Schacke. :) Maybe just a player swap to avoid #12 going around in a circle?
This is the only way I see us not losing 2 1st's and coming out half fair.

Got to involve multiple players and Brisbane for us to have a fair trade to get Gibbs.
 
It'll be either pick 16 this year plus our 2018 first with carltons 2018 2nd coming back, or pick 10 this year, 2018 first next year and Carltons 2018 first coming back.
 
Reported everywhere. The Age, afl.com, Herald Sun - has been reported consistently. Find the links yourself
All I can find is quotes from Kane Cornes. Do you think he would know what the Crows offered to pay Motlop?

He is such a dumbbell, who wanted it to be seen as "Crows offer big $$$", player accepts less to play for "Port Adelaide Culcha", that he may, just may, have put pressure on Port to increase their offer to Motlop.

Even now he's gone to Port, I actually don't mind him as a player. He is disliked by Geelong supporters and seen as a serial underperformer, but part of that is because they can identify his obvious talent and expect more.

if Port can get more out of him then it will be a win for them. More of the same from him and it's a loss.

But the compensation.... there's something seriously wrong somewhere. The AFL need to look into this. Geelong didn't match.... surprise, surprise. Maybe because the compo was beyond their wildest dreams?
 
It'll be either pick 16 this year plus our 2018 first with carltons 2018 2nd coming back, or pick 10 this year, 2018 first next year and Carltons 2018 first coming back.

If that's the price then Adelaide should just walk away and use their picks in the draft.

Carlton can find someone stupid enough to give them the picks they need for Kennedy.

Pick 16 and nothing. They're sure as Hell not getting our future first, and Reid should still be facing a lynch mob if he gives up a future 2nd.
 
If that's the price then Adelaide should just walk away and use their picks in the draft.

Carlton can find someone stupid enough to give them the picks they need for Kennedy.

Pick 16 and nothing. They're sure as Hell not getting our future first, and Reid should still be facing a lynch mob if he gives up a future 2nd.
Cant negotiate with unreasonable people. They are not serious about moving in younger talent if they are going with this shit. Time to walk away but i doubt we wasted much time on it. If they come grovelling later in the week, would stitch that prick sos up well and truly.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

We offered a first and a third last year, a first and a second would've got done last year but we walked away. If we're preparef to offer that this year it should have been offered last year.
Carlton originally wanted out first and either Gov or CC as well. We said no. We offered our first and Lyons which they said no to. They then said two firsts. We offered a first and a third and they said no, we also offered a first and a second and they said no.
 
Geez, what a disaster that turned out to be.

Why?

You want to take some risks and trade in a top ten draft picks who is still only 21 and you get him for **** all.

And then when they do, you say stupid rubbish like this.
 
Carlton originally wanted out first and either Gov or CC as well. We said no. We offered our first and Lyons which they said no to. They then said two firsts. We offered a first and a third and they said no, we also offered a first and a second and they said no.

I'm not sure the last one actually happened.
 
Rockliff would've help us bridge the gap, I don't believe Motlop would.

Rockliff has looked amazing in a team that's finished bottom 4 for the past 'X' amount of years. Reminds of how, apparently Henderson was going to make Geelong an "elite" team.

Without a doubt, Rockliff would have killed it here. Now whether we wanted to add another slow midfielder is a more pertinent question seeing how crippling a slow midfield can be.

Motlop would have been an improvement on Cameron in terms in performance, but would have been off set by Motlop soaking up much more cap space making us the losers in that deal despite the slight on-field improvement.
 
Gibbs will not make much difference on their ladder position next year. They need to maximise their return for him now or they will get a jordan lewis, sam mitchell trade for him in the future. Pick 16 is overs, well and truly. If they want more than that they are just wasting time.
 
Carlton originally wanted out first and either Gov or CC as well. We said no. We offered our first and Lyons which they said no to. They then said two firsts. We offered a first and a third and they said no, we also offered a first and a second and they said no.

Never heard a first and second being reported, but hey why go their again.
 
Cant negotiate with unreasonable people. They are not serious about moving in younger talent if they are going with this shit. Time to walk away but i doubt we wasted much time on it. If they come grovelling later in the week, would stitch that prick sos up well and truly.

That's exactly what we said last year. We thought they'd come grovelling.

And then the AFL gave Geelong an extra first rounder for **** knows why, and we were left looking like idiots.

Carlton don't need success. We do. They can keep huim and it doesn't matter. But we need to get better, because Gibbs is aging at the same rate as Sloane, Betts, Tex, Jenkins, etc.
 
Heard it on AA at the time. They would not budge on two firsts.
We can say we want 2 firsts for cc. Doesnt mean anyone is doing that deal. They are playing the oldest trick in the book. Come to us when your serious about doing a deal.
 
Why?

You want to take some risks and trade in a top ten draft picks who is still only 21 and you get him for **** all.

And then when they do, you say stupid rubbish like this.

Honestly what the f##k are you on about.

We took the risk, traded Menzel and that turned into a disaster, are you disputing this? If you are see a doctor.
 
We can’t anyway, we’ve already given away our future 3rd

We can, because we've already traded in Melbourne's 2018 1st as a replacement.

We can, but we won't. We would be monumentally stupid to agree to such a deal. Noble might do it, Reid has a backbone and certainly won't.

Sent from my D5503 using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top