Post padding
Premiership Player
He had some at Adelaide.
And during the time that Bartlett had concerns. Goodwins house he owns south of Adelaide got pretty smashed up. Motorbikes were heard to leave the house at the time of “ Renovations “.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He had some at Adelaide.
It's amazing the amount of times remors involving drugs and/or gambling involve the 'motorbikes' but never hit the mediaAnd during the time that Bartlett had concerns. Goodwins house he owns south of Adelaide got pretty smashed up. Motorbikes were heard to leave the house at the time of “ Renovations “.
And you think the media didn't know about Bombers drug issues for years beforehand? Is there anyone who didn't know? Much like Goodwin, they choose not to report it because they all want to sniff the liniment or not bite the hand that feeds them.It's amazing the amount of times remors involving drugs and/or gambling involve the 'motorbikes' but never hit the media
* other than when Bomber got arrested with one at his house
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
Is that true or did you read it in the Herald Sun... wait... never mind, carry onThe Herald-Sun says it is true!
You would think so but there are people on here intimating there is a lot more to play out or there is something more sinister to this than is the case, for some reason.Sounds like how it would normally go ... ?
Well, that's a given isn't it?You would think so but there are people on here intimating there is a lot more to play out or there is something more sinister to this than is the case, for some reason.
What do you mean if "more" comes out? So far we've got Glen Bartlett cracking the shits because Kate Roffey didn't hold the lift for him. Can it get any more serious than that?!?!If more comes out, it comes out.
Nope.And during the time that Bartlett had concerns. Goodwins house he owns south of Adelaide got pretty smashed up. Motorbikes were heard to leave the house at the time of “ Renovations “.
Again, we still don't know exactly how he believes he was defamed. What comments is he reffering to specifically, which quotes from which articles. You'd think that would be an important point, one that might be included with a level of specificity since he's claiming he was 'maliciously attacked' in the media. This should all be publicly available. Handwaving it with 'it will come out in the courts' is a cop out.Well, that's a given isn't it?
There are people emphasising "seating arrangements" when the articles go into motivations and whispering campaigns. Downplaying what's right there.
The defamation claims seem to be in relation to people passing on defamatory comments about Bartlett to journalists, for instance. That's not getting much attention from some people.
So there's a bit there that isn't being given attention already.
If more comes out, it comes out. If not, then wait until they got to court.
Again, we still don't know exactly how he believes he was defamed. What comments is he reffering to specifically, which quotes from which articles. You'd think that would be an important point, one that might be included with a level of specificity since he's claiming he was 'maliciously attacked' in the media. This should all be publicly available. Handwaving it with 'it will come out in the courts' is a cop out.
Anyone who saw him on his regular AFL360 gig knew he was cooked. It was blatant.And you think the media didn't know about Bombers drug issues for years beforehand? Is there anyone who didn't know? Much like Goodwin, they choose not to report it because they all want to sniff the liniment or not bite the hand that feeds them.
If that is true, a big if, who is at fault the people making defamatory comments to journos or the journos who print it?Well, that's a given isn't it?
There are people emphasising "seating arrangements" when the articles go into motivations and whispering campaigns. Downplaying what's right there.
The defamation claims seem to be in relation to people passing on defamatory comments about Bartlett to journalists, for instance. That's not getting much attention from some people.
So there's a bit there that isn't being given attention already.
If more comes out, it comes out. If not, then wait until they got to court.
BothIf that is true, a big if, who is at fault the people making defamatory comments to journos or the journos who print it?
That explains why they didn't want him in the elevator.Damn, this one really is getting SPICEY now, isn't it?
Sources are saying Goodwin was heard yelling "SMELL you later, FARTLETT!"
Didn't someone post that Gil had told Bartlett that Goodwin couldn't be seen fraternizing with his players, that it wasn't a good look?When was that even suggested?
I didn't see it if they did.Didn't someone post that Gil had told Bartlett that Goodwin couldn't be seen fraternizing with his players, that it wasn't a good look?
You would think so but there are people on here intimating there is a lot more to play out or there is something more sinister to this than is the case, for some reason.
Didn't someone post that Gil had told Bartlett that Goodwin couldn't be seen fraternizing with his players, that it wasn't a good look?