Goodes - surely must go this time

Remove this Banner Ad

Yeah I read it. It said



Front-on contact is a sub-issue, not the issue.

Not according the AFL, they have stated many time that it is "front on high contact" they are trying to eliminate from the game not head high contact in general, which due to the nature of the game will never be eliminated.

The new rules clearly state you can't make contact to the head of a player when approaching from a front position no matter whether the other player contributes to this or not.

In Goodes case, when grading the contact it will be seen as light and accidental as it was not front on contact but from the side. I agree it will be a week or two due to it being high but it won't be in the same league as Murphy or Burgoyne who both came from the front.

DST
:D
 
Not according the AFL, they have stated many time that it is "front on high contact" they are trying to eliminate from the game not head high contact in general, which due to the nature of the game will never be eliminated.

Not trying to start an argument here, but as someone else said, tell that to Brett Burton. From memory I don't think the Caracella incident involved front-on contact, and that's what sparked the crackdown. Agree, it's a contact sport and players sometimes get hurt, but the AFL are doing their utmost to water down the physical aspect of the game. Don't rule out compulsory helmets down the track.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand

Heard it on SEN lads. How many chances will this bloke get?

Not sure if he had any carry over points as I think he had his previous cases thrown out. Pathetic.
 
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand

Has anyone else been reported this rd for head high contact?
Because if i was that player and got offered weeks i would tell the MRP to get f***ed and that if Goodes got off i should aswell.

Now remember when he elbowed that port guy? he got a repremand of 70 points for that, So after all it looks like he will miss a week.
 
Re: Adam Goodes offered a reprimand

was NOTHING in his report anyways, what the ____ are you guys on about? did you see the report in question, or did you decide to link up Report/goodes/reprimand and then hit the forums and throw in "protected species" "head high contact" like that should NEVER be reported in the first place when they are clearly accidental and at worse case a free kick on the park

My god the lot of you are idiots.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Goodes - surely must go this time

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top