Competition Goose's rate the Opposition MVP s35 edition.

[Braklet]

Rd 3 OOB vs. Ersatz Demons who don't like hot sauce

3. sausageroll
2. Headless
1. Greenery

Thread 3/5, decent fun, got kinda flat now and then

 

[manangatang]

Rd 3 OOB vs. Ersatz Demons who don't like hot sauce

3. sausageroll
2. Headless
1. Greenery

Thread 3/5, decent fun, got kinda flat now and then

Oh there were reasons for the flatness. None of them an ‘us’ thing.

Was a week.

 

[Braklet]

Oh there were reasons for the flatness. None of them an ‘us’ thing.

Was a week.

OOB not flat, very much an Ophidian dominated match thread.

 

[Braklet]

OOB not flat, very much an Ophidian dominated match thread.

Actually, I think it was a Mobbs PM:

 

[manangatang]

OOB not flat, very much an Ophidian dominated match thread.

If a couple of your posters hadn’t flamed out and been ridiculous, you just might find the thread would have been different.

 

[Barrybran]

If a couple of your posters hadn’t flamed out and been ridiculous, you just might find the thread would have been different.

Interesting

 

[Braklet]

If a couple of your posters hadn’t flamed out and been ridiculous, you just might find the thread would have been different.

Coulda woulda shoulda...

OOB mostly had fun, we can't be held responsible when some Dees stomp off in a mod/ad huff.

Flameouts occurred in other threads.

 

[Senor M]

OOB not flat, very much an Ophidian dominated match thread.

A spammy match thread is not necessarily an indicator of a quality match thread.

 

[Headless]

OOB not flat, very much an Ophidian dominated match thread.

A spammy match thread is not necessarily an indicator of a quality match thread.

Exactly. Completing "dominating" is not a good thing.

 

[Braklet]

A spammy match thread is not necessarily an indicator of a quality match thread.

A melty poster is not necessarily an indicator of a quality qootyer.

 

[Braklet]

Exactly. Completing "dominating" is not a good thing.

Says the 82 post Headless!

 

[Senor M]

A spammy match thread is not necessarily an indicator of a quality match thread.

A melty poster is not necessarily an indicator of a quality qootyer.

Did they teach you how to use a “No, U” at Spotswood?

If this was the level of “banter” put up last week, no wonder the Demons got bored.

 

[manangatang]

Coulda woulda shoulda...

OOB mostly had fun, we can't be held responsible when some Dees stomp off in a mod/ad huff.

Flameouts occurred in other threads.

Um no.

 

[Braklet]

Did they teach you how to use a “No, U” at Spotswood?

Awww, did hims get upset with the mirror image?

 

[Supersuns]

Exactly. Completing "dominating" is not a good thing.

 

[Braklet]

Um no.

Is an "Um no" anything like a "No U?" Asking for a friend.

 

[Elton Johns Wig]

Oh there were reasons for the flatness. None of them an ‘us’ thing.

Never is a you thing mang, always someone else, always. It must be tiring to always be in the right, I don't know how you do it.

 

[Barrybran]

Did they teach you how to use a “No, U” at Spotswood?

If this was the level of “banter” put up last week, no wonder the Demons got bored.

You've made an excellent point above. This is where you go to another thread and let things mellow for a while.

 

[GWS Goose]

As I have said many, many times before, post counts are a lousy measure.
There is also very little correlation between the amount of posts and quality of the thread.

 

[Braklet]

Never is a you thing mang, always someone else, always. It must be tiring to always be in the right, I don't know how you do it.

Heavy is the head that wears the halo, especially when they're a Demon.

 

[Robertio]

As I have said many, many times before, post counts are a lousy measure.
There is also very little correlation between the amount of posts and quality of the thread.

Why don't you read the whole thread and form your own opinion and get back to me.

 

[Headless]

Why don't you read the whole thread and form your own opinion and get back to me.

No need, Goose - I've already done that for you.

 

[Braklet]

As I have said many, many times before, post counts are a lousy measure.
There is also very little correlation between the amount of posts and quality of the thread.

"Flat" is a mostly quantitative measure, certainly more in proportion to post count than the subjective "quality" chimera in which iron jockeys take refuge when their inactivity flatness is identified.

 

[Barrybran]

"Flat" is a mostly quantitative measure, certainly more in proportion to post count than the subjective "quality" chimera in which iron jockeys take refuge when their inactivity flatness is identified.

I haven't read the OOB v Demons thread but I'm curious to know why you felt the Demons flat

 

[GWS Goose]

Why don't you read the whole thread and form your own opinion and get back to me.

I wasnt speaking about a specific thread. This may or may not have been awesome. I was speaking generally.