- Thread starter
- #101
Not sure if restraint of trade would put a finish to that but idea has merit.Any love for making contracts a minimum of 3 years and allowing players to be cleared only once every 3 years ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Not sure if restraint of trade would put a finish to that but idea has merit.Any love for making contracts a minimum of 3 years and allowing players to be cleared only once every 3 years ?
A contract in itself is a restraint of trade, however, they are hardly worth the paper they are written on. If a player was to be in breach, how many clubs would have the money to pursue this? If a club was to be in breach, a player could go the "employee line" and bring in Fairwork etc. Unless AFL Victoria is prepared to provide a contract framework with sanctions for breaches then it is simply a matter of hope for the best. As it stands, you could sign me today for $500 per game and in March I could sign elsewhere for $600 a game and the best you could hope for is the court ordering me to perform my part. No compensation or the like. Would I be cleared, how much can you spend?Not sure if restraint of trade would put a finish to that but idea has merit.
Why ?Why? Three years is a long time if you aren't happy at a club for whatever reason.
I just think players should have the freedom to choose where they play footy each year.
Why ?
1. To reduce the likelihood of clubs spending up big in one year and then spending the next 10 years trying to save the club , languishing at the bottom of the ladder .
Clubs in every league do this. Usually 2-3 years and then fall away. Do you want the league to reduce standard?
2. To avoid mercenaries signing large contracts , not living up to expectations and then moving on to the next victim .
The players only accept the offer the club makes. We seem to have alot of people on this forum stating players only playing for money. As per above clubs offer what they need to in recruiting these players. Have a look at the leadership and committee of the club not the individual as they only take what's on offer.
3. To encourage clubs and players to think a little more before making short sighted arrangements .
As per above look at the management of the club by the committee. Some want short term success but in general the teams who are competitive every year have had long term stability on the committee and know what it takes to run a club.
4. Will most likely see clubs and players invest more time into the well being of each other .
Not disagreeing with your thoughts on well run clubs and/or players being the ones offered the cash nor that quality people feel obliged to repay .As a player accepting cash with expectations surely the player has to perform. Once again the better clubs always look after their players and usually this means the player is obligated to stay at the club to repay the help.
Any love for making contracts a minimum of 3 years and allowing players to be cleared only once every 3 years ?
Yea criticize a suggestion based on one point . A contracted player by any chance ?One of the more stupid statements I have read. How many people actually stay in the same work job for 3 years? so how can a player commit for 3 years? who knows where his personal life/career/other factors will take him.
Agree something has to be done but this is plan dumb. Get real.
Would be much more worthwhile talking about a points system.
hahaha love the close mates line these days in footy...
ok lets get some talk and name the top 10 gvl players as we speak???
Paul Newman
Jason Morgan
Mitch Kendell
Saad Saad
Paul Colbert
Brendan Hollow
Jason Eagle
Luke Morgan
Dan Lovick
Tyson Sidebottom
(No Order)
1.paul newman
2.luke morgan
3.dan lovick
4.saad saad
5.jason eagle
6.quade johnstone
7.ash watson
8.jason morgan
9.paul colbert
10.tom sheldon
unlucky players- Brendan hollow,brodie avard,shaun huy,nick allan
dan lewis only had couple of standout games in my eyes but im sure anyone from m,pna would disagree as they seen him everyweek... always a debate with this stuff..
Rhys Archard has apparently signed with Moama todayhaha well u must be a Echuca supporter how could archard be 2!! Yes was great player in his prime but not sure his fitness has him able to reach great heights and if any Echuca player had a case its buckley.. Di bella didn't win b and f brad Henderson did.. johnstone was runner up in swans b and f I think and no I barrack for shepp bears hence why I had nick allan in my unlucky players!!