Greatest Dynasty of the 21st century - Lions vs Cats vs Hawks vs Tigers

[Fadge]

Not sure what your problem is with mine. I considered more than anybody else here.

You just when W/L record. Great analysis, a baby could do that.

Actually, if you reference the original dynasty thread, I gave detailed analysis for all clubs (including Sydney), considering a lot more than W/L records.

Geelong were 1st, Richmond 5th.

 

[RUNVS]

Most of the votes for Richmond seem to come from Richmond fans. Remove those votes and Richmond likely has under 20 votes for them.

 

[Cleansweep17]

Actually, if you reference the original dynasty thread, I gave detailed analysis for all clubs (including Sydney), considering a lot more than W/L records.

Geelong were 1st, Richmond 5th.

Like what? cbf looking through it.

All you talk about are W/L records. So I’m guessing your previous content was probably like Sydney’s sustained excellence is better than Richmonds and therefore despite winning less flags they are a better dynasty (even though they aren’t a dynasty). Am I sort of on the money?

 

[Cleansweep17]

Most of the votes for Richmond seem to come from Richmond fans. Remove those votes and Richmond likely has under 20 votes for them.

Did you think Geelong would win the 2008 GF?

The majority are wrong pretty often. Plus who knows what people will think in 10-15 from now.

I haven’t heard anybody rebut my previous comments. They just complain about them. Would you like to give it a go?

 

[Cleansweep17]

Who were they previously?

Nobody, he says that about everybody he disagrees with. Even supporters from other clubs. It’s insane. Him saying there are like 20 previous accounts should give you a hint he’s full of crap.

 

[Mr Meow]

Nobody, he says that about everybody he disagrees with. Even supporters from other clubs. It’s insane. Him saying there are like 20 previous accounts should give you a hint he’s full of crap.

It's fairly obvious that you are in fact Falcon though.

I forget the rest of the aliases.

You've got a very identifiable posting style and also the exact same word for word arguments on every topic.

 

[Cleansweep17]

It's fairly obvious that you are in fact Falcon though.

I forget the rest of the aliases.

You've got a very identifiable posting style and also the exact same word for word arguments on every topic.

Mind sticking to talking about footy mate.

This schtick is starting to get old.

 

[Fadge]

Like what? cbf looking through it.

All you talk about are W/L records. So I’m guessing your previous content was probably like Sydney’s sustained excellence is better than Richmonds and therefore despite winning less flags they are a better dynasty (even though they aren’t a dynasty). Am I sort of on the money?

Really?

If you bothered to review my analysis, I define what I believe to constitute a sporting dynasty, and analyse each of the teams relative to one another based on defined criteria.

1. Geelong
2. Hawthorn
3. Brisbane
4. Sydney
5. Richmond

 

[Fadge]

It's fairly obvious that you are in fact Falcon though.

I forget the rest of the aliases.

You've got a very identifiable posting style and also the exact same word for word arguments on every topic.

The other aliases didn't last long enough to leave an impression.

Edit: How could I forget STRONDandBALD?

 

[Cleansweep17]

Really?

If you bothered to review my analysis, I define what I believe to constitute a sporting dynasty, and analyse each of the teams relative to one another based on defined criteria.

1. Geelong
2. Hawthorn
3. Brisbane
4. Sydney
5. Richmond

Interesting list, must not be sustained excellence then if Brisbane are 3rd or flags of Sydney are 4th. So what is your definition?

 

[Fadge]

Interesting list, must not be sustained excellence then if Brisbane are 3rd or flags of Sydney are 4th. So what is your definition?

Read the original thread with my detailed analysis if you're interested.

 

[Cleansweep17]

Read the original thread with my detailed analysis if you're interested.

What’s the thread name and post number?

 

[FreddyTwoShoes]

Who were they previously?

He’s the famous Falcon. Has posted some truly legendary stuff.
Glad he’s back.

 

[Fadge]

What’s the thread name and post number?

Greatest Dynasty of the 21st century - Lions vs Cats vs Hawks vs Tigers

Such a wonderful way of having a conversation there mate. If you have a different opinion, that's fine. Happy to discuss. That's what a 'forum' is for. If you don't like other people's opinions - log off. Most adults can do it. tiggers are a minority if they count those who actually use...

www.bigfooty.com

My assessment starts on page 15, post 370.

Was a great thread, with some interesting (and not so interesting) points...

 

[Cleansweep17]

Greatest Dynasty of the 21st century - Lions vs Cats vs Hawks vs Tigers

Such a wonderful way of having a conversation there mate. If you have a different opinion, that's fine. Happy to discuss. That's what a 'forum' is for. If you don't like other people's opinions - log off. Most adults can do it. tiggers are a minority if they count those who actually use...

www.bigfooty.com

My assessment starts on page 15, post 370.

Was a great thread, with some interesting (and not so interesting) points...

It’s literally what I said. You used win% and sustained success (I.e finishing positions per season)

What I find strange that I doubt most people would agree with is that your dynasty timeframes overlap and aren’t from the first flag to the last. 2 flags is also enough for a dynasty in Sydney’s case 7 years apart? That’s pretty odd.

What I also find interesting that you might have not picked up on yourself is that how you rank your dynasties is how you rank your players too. You primarily focus longevity over everything else. Peaks (i.e flags or numbers of Brownlows) do not factor in to your decision making, at least not significantly. Hence you rate Sydney over Tigers despite it being 2 flags to 3? You would prefer to have 1 less flag?

You can have whatever opinion you like but don’t try to pass something like the above off as fact. Nobody and I mean nobody would I agree with the above.

 

[Fadge]

It’s literally what I said. You used win% and sustained success (I.e finishing positions per season)

What I find strange that I doubt most people would agree with is that your dynasty timeframes overlap and aren’t from the first flag to the last. 2 flags is also enough for a dynasty in Sydney’s case 7 years apart? That’s pretty odd.

What I also find interesting that you might have not picked up on yourself is that how you rank your dynasties is how you rank your players too. You primarily focus longevity over everything else. Peaks (i.e flags or numbers of Brownlows) do not factor in to your decision making, at least not significantly. Hence you rate Sydney over Tigers despite it being 2 flags to 3? You would prefer to have 1 less flag?

You can have whatever opinion you like but don’t try to pass something like the above off as fact. Nobody and I mean nobody would I agree with the above.

Thanks for your feedback, Falcon... I mean STRONGandBALD....I mean CleanSweep.

But I really don't care.

 

[Cleansweep17]

Thanks for your feedback, Falcon... I mean STRONGandBALD....I mean CleanSweep.

But I really don't care.

And you made a little mistake

You put Sydney above Lions there as well!!!

But yeah I’m the deluded one apparently.

What’s sad is Mr. Meow wouldn’t agree with you either but he’s being a little simp and liking every comment you make like it’s his job.

 

[harper2bastinac]

All great teams but my personal pick is Brisbane, that team was incredible to watch

 

[Fadge]

And you made a little mistake

You put Sydney above Lions there as well!!!

Yes, I did make that little mistake earlier in this thread.

Given the analysis was over 3 years ago, the main take away was Geelong were first and Richmond were 5th. That's all that really mattered in the context of our back and forth.

 

[Mr Meow]

And you made a little mistake

You put Sydney above Lions there as well!!!

But yeah I’m the deluded one apparently.

What’s sad is Mr. Meow wouldn’t agree with you either but he’s being a little simp and liking every comment you make like it’s his job.

You're really craving my attention today for some reason Falcon.

Everything good at home?

 

[STPer18]

Thanks for your feedback, Falcon... I mean STRONGandBALD....I mean CleanSweep.

But I really don't care.

Come on, it's a different person, just as all the following were different people.

Unpredictable
EatMyDusty
The Intimidator
MutinyOnTheBounty
StateOfPlay
Uno
Thomas Erdody
Tiger 33
9Nine
Tiger 21

 

[Mr Meow]

Come on, it's a different person, just as all the following were different people.

Unpredictable
EatMyDusty
The Intimidator
MutinyOnTheBounty
StateOfPlay
Uno
Thomas Erdody
Tiger 33
9Nine
Tiger 21

Cleansweep17 one last chance to fess up.

Would be a brave decision.

Let's end the cycle.

 

[Cleansweep17]

Yes, I did make that little mistake earlier in this thread.

Given the analysis was over 3 years ago, the main take away was Geelong were first and Richmond were 5th. That's all that really mattered in the context of our back and forth.

Yeah no. You rate Sydney higher than Lions. Which destroys any credibility you have. I thought I was edgy, but you are on another level. Impressive.

 

[Cleansweep17]

Cleansweep17 one last chance to fess up.

Would be a brave decision.

Let's end the cycle.

I don’t think you realise how funny that post is. You’ve cooked it. The paranoia is mad.

 

[Mr Meow]

I don’t think you realise how funny that post is. You’ve cooked it. The paranoia is mad.

Chance not taken.

You're even using the same phrasing as StrongAndBald, who also definitely wasn't you, and are interacting with the same posters on identical topics with identical arguments.

You truly have no shame, do you?