-
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Greatest Dynasty of the 21st century - Lions vs Cats vs Hawks vs Tigers
- Thread starter Rasha
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- May 21, 2015
- 4,592
- 6,923
- AFL Club
- Richmond
With no back to back flags I wouldn't really rate the Geelong side as a dynasty, more a slightly better version of the North Melbourne or West Coast sides of the 90s
- May 21, 2015
- 4,592
- 6,923
- AFL Club
- Richmond
I'm more than happy to be the third best side of the AFL era
- Oct 19, 2020
- 24,855
- 34,672
- AFL Club
- Richmond
The Tigers was best because it captured the imagination of the public.
So many stories like Marlion Pickett, Dusty's total and utter dominance ect
So many stories like Marlion Pickett, Dusty's total and utter dominance ect
- Oct 29, 2017
- 21,580
- 41,957
- AFL Club
- Richmond
For supreme top 4 sides, do you think the value of a win and 4 points in a regular game is greater than a win in a final?Hint - Richmonds 8 flags to Collingwoods 2 since 1967 may shed some light
Last edited:
- Oct 29, 2017
- 21,580
- 41,957
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Sounds like the guy who emotionally barked at Richmonds votes around the first page of the thread.... oh wait, man, it is you!Dont you just wish your team qualified as a Dynasty this side of the Beatles, rather than hanging off our sucess ?
You poor victim!
Last edited:
Why do Richmond supporters always need to have qualifiers around their statements?
Oh, I know why....
15 > 13, and
4 > 2
- Oct 29, 2017
- 21,580
- 41,957
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Rent free baby. Rent free
Too many variables to make that comment.
- May 5, 2016
- 45,731
- 51,228
- AFL Club
- Geelong
What does that even mean? England are absolutely hopeless and anyone thinking they would have won or drawn this series would have been on drugs. Just because I think Ben stokes is a fantastic player doesn’t mean I think his team is any good. What a stupid thing to say
Haha I was only taking a cheap shot PB, calm down friend.
Stokes is having an absolute shocker. In particular his bowling 50 overs 4 wickets for 250 runs at 5rpo in favourable bowling conditions I think does show he is a very limited bowler. His overall bowling in 17 Ashes tests averaging 40 odd and going at 4rpo is very unhealthy, especially given these have tended to be lower scoring matches. His batting at 34 average for a number 5 is hardly setting the world alight either.
Yet it seems he is an Ashes “legend” and a “moments player.”
Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 100,161
- 250,200
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #493
They barely beat Collingwood.
Gunslinging Roo
Rookie
- Feb 9, 2010
- 49
- 53
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Melbourne Storm, Oakland Raiders
And the Hawks, as good as they were, barely beat Freo...
And this, my friends, is why the Cats are Numero Uno.
Comfortably.
Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 100,161
- 250,200
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #497
That’s the Hawks that played off in the 2012 GF, won the next 3(I’m guessing you’ve forgotten how “unstoppable the Dockers are with the pressure that they bring” ) and at Round 18 of 2016 were a game clear on top of the ladder….if not for Roughead’s cancer battle Hawks probably win a 4th.
Last edited:
Geelong lost to us AHAHHA
Bradbury pick
I thought you said it was because they won 50 something home and away games or something.
Similar threads
- Poll
