Injury Harris Andrews injury updates :(

Remove this Banner Ad

Rob O'Neill has shown members of the Tribunal a document with frame-by-frame images of the incident. He is arguing that Cameron had 6/50ths of a second to brace for contact, after initially attempting to spoil. He says that action is careless, but not enough to intentionally strike Andrews.

Rob O'Neill is now showing an incident involving Kurt Tippett and Dylan Grimes, which has been graded as careless. He submits that if Tippett's effort was a realistic attempt to spoil the ball or protect himself, Cameron's cannot be classified as intentional/

What was said on the weekend was that an elbow above 90 degrees is automatically intentional so this stuff should be moot. That was Eddie Maguire going on what he was "told by experts" so who knows...
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

He is claiming he was in action of raising fist for spoil, saw Harris half way through, tried to protect himself. Agree with you though.

There's a gif posted here that disproves both these arguments. Lmao.
 
Nick Pane QC is arguing that Tippett and Membrey were closer to impacting on the ball than Cameron was. He says the incident involving Tom Jonas and Andrew Gaff is a more comparable example. That incident was graded as intentional. O'Neill says Jonas was never a realistic chance of getting to the ball, whereas Cameron was.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Injury Harris Andrews injury updates :(

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top