Perryman is the most vanilla player going around. Paying him anything more than 600k on a lengthy contract is a laugh. Then again, Essendon gave McGrath a six year deal on 700k+ a year so anything is possible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every year the media talks about Port over paying and having no cap room. Every year it turns out to be false.
Port don't pay their recruits anywhere near what the media claims and their ability to keep recruiting proves it.
One thing Port do well is manage the cap.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Down to Collingwood and Port? With Port in the box seatHawks no longer interested.
Reckon he announces Port on Monday.Down to Collingwood and Port? With Port in the box seat
Good, didn't think much of him . Keep Morrison instead.Hawks no longer interested.
With Barrass and Battle coming in, defensive stocks will be pretty stacked. Perryman wouldn't fill a need for them any more.Hawks no longer interested.
Perryman is a lucky man to be out of contract at the right time with the increasing salary caps. He should take the highest offer on the table as he is never again going to get the attention or pay packet that is being talked off.Good, didn't think much of him . Keep Morrison instead.
Karl Amon was an unrestricted free agent that went back to Melbourne to be closer to family.If Port are offering that sort of coin, I wonder how their supporters are feeling now in releasing a better player in Karl Amon for $650K only just a few season ago because he was too costly.
Amon was not released he asked for a trade to return home, same as Jarman Impy and what Dan is doingPerryman is a lucky man to be out of contract at the right time with the increasing salary caps. He should take the highest offer on the table as he is never again going to get the attention or pay packet that is being talked off.
He is just an AFL player and at 800K+ per year, yeah I think the Hawks would be stupid to get rid of Morrison.
If Port are offering that sort of coin, I wonder how their supporters are feeling now in releasing a better player in Karl Amon for $650K only just a few season ago because he was too costly.
Amon was a free agent.......Amon was not released he asked for a trade to return home, same as Jarman Impy and what Dan is doing
Could have sworn the PA army was arguing that Hawthorn overpaid and that KCornes and Rucci were leading the way with an incorrect and club-fed 700K+ per year.
There’s been a lot of stories about whether it was going to be St Kilda or Hawthorn.
“What Hawthorn have put on the table; there’s no way Port will match that in the free agency.”
SEN SA co-host Kym Dillon asked: “How much?”
Rucci replied: “It’s five years around $700,000-plus.”
Former Port Adelaide winger Karl Amon is officially a Hawk, joining the brown and gold on a four-year deal as an unrestricted free agent.
The 27-year-old, who finished 12th in this year’s Brownlow Medal count, chose Hawthorn over Melbourne and St Kilda.
Amon’s deal is understood to be worth about $650,000 per season after he averaged 24 disposals, four inside 50s and almost 500m gained in what was arguably a career-best year in 2022.
He made the All-Australian squad of 40 last season with similar numbers.
My initial point was that Perryman is not worth anywhere near the $600K mark let alone 800K and that he would be foolish not to take the highest offer on teh table.What's the point of all this? I don't think you'd find many Port fans who didn't like Amon and still would prefer he was on our list.. but as i recall it, he was a free agent who exercised his right to return back to Victoria.
Who's to say if Port matched Hawthorn's contract that he wouldn't have still preferred to go to Hawthorn anyway?
My initial point was that Perryman is not worth anywhere near the $600K mark let alone 800K and that he would be foolish not to take the highest offer on teh table.
It then reminded me that Port who seems okay paying the $800k now to an inferior player, was very reluctant to pay Amon $600K only two years ago and were questioning his worth. He may not have stayed. But that wasn't the story they were running with at the time and downplaying him after making the 40 man squad.
I am sure he and Port are happy now regardless.
Sounds like you are okay with paying 800K+ to Perryman?
I would have thought Port would be seeking better than Perryman for 800K after forking out on Ratagaoloiue last year.
Reckon he announces Port on Monday.
Port could've been offering Amon $800K, it still wouldn't have helped with the goal of being in Melbourne closer to his family.My initial point was that Perryman is not worth anywhere near the $600K mark let alone 800K and that he would be foolish not to take the highest offer on teh table.
It then reminded me that Port who seems okay paying the $800k now to an inferior player, was very reluctant to pay Amon $600K only two years ago and were questioning his worth. He may not have stayed. But that wasn't the story they were running with at the time and downplaying him after making the 40 man squad.
I am sure he and Port are happy now regardless.
Sounds like you are okay with paying 800K+ to Perryman?
I would have thought Port would be seeking better than Perryman for 800K after forking out on Ratagaoloiue last year.
Reckon hes going to you, something about better post career opportunities? Richards now Perryman.Still Waiting
Farrell has been better imoPort could've been offering Amon $800K, it still wouldn't have helped with the goal of being in Melbourne closer to his family.
A free hit is a free hitI think that is all fair enough assessment. Seems to be a bit of desperation from Port in trying to get Perryman over the line.
Although at the same time, multiple clubs have been into Perryman, so i think any club that gets him will end up paying overs, as is the case for most UFA.
wouldnt be surprised if the Brownlow means the media are told to put other footy stories on hold for the dayStill Waiting
Port could've been offering Amon $800K, it still wouldn't have helped with the goal of being in Melbourne closer to his family.
Hope so.Reckon he announces Port on Monday.
My initial point was that Perryman is not worth anywhere near the $600K mark let alone 800K and that he would be foolish not to take the highest offer on teh table.
It then reminded me that Port who seems okay paying the $800k now to an inferior player, was very reluctant to pay Amon $600K only two years ago and were questioning his worth. He may not have stayed. But that wasn't the story they were running with at the time and downplaying him after making the 40 man squad.
I am sure he and Port are happy now regardless.
Sounds like you are okay with paying 800K+ to Perryman?
I would have thought Port would be seeking better than Perryman for 800K after forking out on Ratagaoloiue last year.
I agree that, generally speaking, Perryman doesn't seem worth $800k per year but it's hard to judge player payments from the outside because $800k means something different to every club. I'm sure $800k to Sydney, means something very different than to Richmond. Yes, paying $800k to Perryman might mean that they can't afford to pay Butters when his contract is next up, but I doubt it. I am sure that the Port Powers list management is competent enough to consider that. If they deem that they can afford to spend $800k per year on a player, then they might as well spend it on the best player they can attract - which in this case appears to be Perryman. That is especially true when you consider that Port Power are coming off a top four finish.I think that is all fair enough assessment. Seems to be a bit of desperation from Port in trying to get Perryman over the line.
Although at the same time, multiple clubs have been into Perryman, so i think any club that gets him will end up paying overs, as is the case for most UFA.