As said earlier, a competent club isn’t delisting a player they aren’t comfortable might be picked up elsewhere.Wingard had a medical with the pies this week somehow I think the club wouldn’t be too upset if he gets picked up by another club
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
As said earlier, a competent club isn’t delisting a player they aren’t comfortable might be picked up elsewhere.Wingard had a medical with the pies this week somehow I think the club wouldn’t be too upset if he gets picked up by another club
Did you hear the one about the delisted free agent, his manager, Graham Wright and Craig McRae walking into a bar?Have a second go at reading my post
Just filling in time on a quiet Friday. Who doesn’t love a medical just for kicks ?Did you hear the one about the delisted free agent, his manager, Graham Wright and Craig McRae walking into a bar?
I think you probably want to google the definition of pandering…I think the ppl pandering for more high end draft picks should go and have a look at that 3peat. Even with me saying that i am setting a really high bar we do not need to be that good. So look at the lineup at ask ureself how many were traded in how many from the rookie draft etc. I am sure someone has already done this. Get back to me with the numbers
Pick 3 rookie draft who gets selected first Wingard or Stephens?Wingard had a medical with the pies this week somehow I think the club wouldn’t be too upset if he gets picked up by another club
Exactly- I said similar earlierAs said earlier, a competent club isn’t delisting a player they aren’t comfortable might be picked up elsewhere.
Absolutely - nothing better to do heading into the weekendJust filling in time on a quiet Friday. Who doesn’t love a medical just for kicks ?
The Richmond and West Coast sides from 2017 and 2018 weren't full of first rounders either.
I've gone of record of saying this before, but our Fab 5 are Newcombe, Day, Sicily, Moore and Lewis. Only one was a first rounder. All 5 would be walk up starts to any side in the competition.
The number of first round picks means nothing. How you develop the players you have means a hell of a lot more.
But what about that unwritten rule between clubs. The rule that all clubs know about delisted agreements bar NorthWingard had a medical with the pies this week somehow I think the club wouldn’t be too upset if he gets picked up by another club
As said earlier, a competent club isn’t delisting a player they aren’t comfortable might be picked up elsewhere.
Who could blame Chad if he did go to the pies! At the end of his career and a chance to win a premiership in 2024/25Channel 9 sport preview mentioned
"pies swoop in on a delisted hawk" showing vision of Chad.
However, it’s reported that his preference is to remain at Hawthorn, who have committed to redrafting him on the rookie list later this month.Report: Wingard meets with reigning premiers after being delisted
Chad Wingard has met with a rival club after being delisted on Thursday.www.sen.com.au
Gone. Pies. Fk it.
Yep. Wants 2 years and they'll do it.Not necessarily at all.
The base to compete is there if they all/most come on. This is going to be the big challenge for our list in the coming years is continuing to fill out our list while turning potential into performance.To anyone that thinks we don't already have a solid base or we need more high draft picks, I really think you need to have a closer look at things.
The point is, the club believes we have not just the nucleus but a list now that will deliver us sustainable success in time as these players naturally develop. With the players we know we're getting in the draft we're comfortable enough to head into 2024 with a full list.
We draft for a purpose. We didn't take Henry at 37 because we thought we'd take a chance and we didn't take Max because we had a spot open so why not? We picked them both because we saw both as becoming integral parts of our next generation success. I've picked those two as examples because the club is very big on both in the next two years. I think you'll see Max playing regular senior footy from early next year and Henry cementing a spot after the bye.
They're precisely the type of players we want - we saw ourselves as needing - and yeah they could turn out to be busts but right now we have faith they'll become what we think they can achieve. That's why we drafted them particularly.
The elite nucleus is there, the base is very definitely there and the talent is coming out. We'll be approaching 2024 with a full list and a fair bit of confidence.
But what about that unwritten rule between clubs. The rule that all clubs know about delisted agreements bar North
1 year. They'll take him with pick 60 in the ND.And we definitely won't?
Be foolhardy in the extreme if the Hawks were to give Chad a two year contract with his injury history and coming of an Achilles.Yep. Wants 2 years and they'll do it.