Hird to have his say

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
absolutely

even if Hird knew Dank used TB4 why would he go after Dank? That would mean Hird knew and didnt stop it

Do you think the players took TB4?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Why are you sympathising with Jenny. She's been ruthlessly and relentlessly trolling you as a harmless NK Dictator for nearly a year
 
Well, he's said the truth will be told (and to the immense benefit of the footy club), so here we are.

We've all waited long enough, and those who've been deluded by the spin for too long at least deserve something half-credible.

Sunday night, prime time television. Put up, Jimmy. It had better be bloody good.
 
I do. Im very interested in his answers
Don't get your hopes up for honest answers that give any true details.
 
Why are you sympathising with Jenny. She's been ruthlessly and relentlessly trolling you as a harmless NK Dictator for nearly a year

I'll assume this was meant for me.

Sympathy post is when a thread isn't going to well/is shit, so you post in it in the hope that more people do.

It's just my way of saying i thought it was a shit thread :)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

my view is he coached, and just assumed Dank was doing what he was instructed to do. I dont think Dank deliberately doped the players. I think he didnt realise TB4 was banned, as he revealed to McKenzie

I just would have thought that someone like Hird may have gone to the trouble of doing a little research into the stuff that Dunk was giving the players, or at least making a phone call to WADA. Wouldn't have taken long.
 
absolutely

even if Hird knew Dank used TB4 why would he go after Dank? That would mean Hird knew and didnt stop it
What makes you certain he wanted to stop it? What if he had been assured these peptides will help you win, they're not specifically named as such on the prohibited list, and they can't be picked up in testing? What if he thought that was fine - texts indicate he had worked himself into a mental position that it isn't as such wrong because lots of clubs are doing it?

I'm not saying this happened, but I'm confused by your certainty. It's very convenient for not only EFC but the whole AFL that everything comes down to one lone rogue contractor no longer employed at the team...
 
I'll assume this was meant for me.

Sympathy post is when a thread isn't going to well/is shit, so you post in it in the hope that more people do.

It's just my way of saying i thought it was a shit thread :)
:thumbsu:

Need to work further on common thread terms and conventions
 
my hopes are Tracey Holmes will make him squirm. His reactions will be interesting
I doubt Tracey will go very hard at all. I think there's a very good reason Hird agreed to be questioned by her, so we can really only hope it's an ambush.
 
What makes you certain he wanted to stop it? What if he had been assured these peptides will help you win, they're not specifically named as such on the prohibited list, and they can't be picked up in testing? What if he thought that was fine - texts indicate he had worked himself into a mental position that it isn't as such wrong because lots of clubs are doing it?

I'm not saying this happened, but I'm confused by your certainty. It's very convenient for not only EFC but the whole AFL that everything comes down to one lone rogue contractor no longer employed at the team...
I dont believe Dank went rogue, I think he failed to realise he was now using a banned substance. He used TB4 legally the year before at Cronulla, and it wasnt until McKenzie told him in 2013 that it was banned that he changed his story
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top