Hobart stadium business case

Remove this Banner Ad



It is a simple case of the AFL putting in their demands, saying if Tasmania want an AFL team they need a stadium with a roof, not unreasonable given there are a lot of games in Tasmania that are rain affected and rain makes some pretty crappy AFL games, so it is up to Tasmania as to whether they agree or not. No one is forcing them, the AFL have laid out the conditions, and they have to decide if it is worth it or not. They can't have a team in a stadium with no roof as that just makes the AFL product worse.
 
It is a simple case of the AFL putting in their demands, saying if Tasmania want an AFL team they need a stadium with a roof, not unreasonable given there are a lot of games in Tasmania that are rain affected and rain makes some pretty crappy AFL games, so it is up to Tasmania as to whether they agree or not. No one is forcing them, the AFL have laid out the conditions, and they have to decide if it is worth it or not. They can't have a team in a stadium with no roof as that just makes the AFL product worse.
Hobart gets less rain than any capital city other than Adelaide and half that of Sydney.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Where did I say that all Tasmanian games have shit weather?

So the rationale is that Tassie needs a stadium with a roof because sometimes you get bad weather, but if Tassie doesn’t build a stadium with a roof then they don’t get a team and the Hawks and Roos can keep playing in Tassie stadiums without roofs (sometimes in bad weather) ?.
 
So the rationale is that Tassie needs a stadium with a roof because sometimes you get bad weather, but if Tassie doesn’t build a stadium with a roof then they don’t get a team and the Hawks and Roos can keep playing in Tassie stadiums without roofs (sometimes in bad weather) ?.

Was never really a fan of North and Hawthorn playing in Tasmania either.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It is a simple case of the AFL putting in their demands, saying if Tasmania want an AFL team they need a stadium with a roof, not unreasonable given there are a lot of games in Tasmania that are rain affected and rain makes some pretty crappy AFL games, so it is up to Tasmania as to whether they agree or not. No one is forcing them, the AFL have laid out the conditions, and they have to decide if it is worth it or not. They can't have a team in a stadium with no roof as that just makes the AFL product worse.

Yes, while pissing away millions on GWS/GCS? Population doesn't necessarily translate into popularity you know. I guess it never rains in almighty Sydney, am I right?
 
Oh dear, apparently AFL games can't be played in the cold. But EPL and Gridiron can??? Honestly WTF, how soft is this country becoming?

View attachment 2214195


View attachment 2214197

Different games. Soccer looks pretty similar in the wet or dry. When it is wet in the AFL it goes from an amazing looking game to what looks like an under 6 soccer match where everyone chases the ball and the only tactic is kicking it forward.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hobart stadium business case

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top