Politics Hypocrisy of The Right.

[Gralin]

The SHOCKING! revelation that Putin’s gangsta state has been sneakily funding far-right propagandists in the United States has certainly caused A Splash. Not unreasonably, those at the centre of the scandal — Tenet Media’s owners Lauren Chen and Liam Donovan, along with professional binfluencers Matt Christensen, Tayler Hansen, Benny Johnson, Dave Rubin, Lauren Southern and Pim Tool — have thus far defended themselves by simply claiming Useful Idiot and/or Victim status. Thus while more than handy at detecting the evil influence of (((Soros))) & Co. at every political moment, the group was, unfortunately, deeply incurious as to who was paying them millions of dollars to shitpoast far-right talking-points.

Lauren ‘The Great Replacement’ Southern, Tenet Media & Daddy Putin

The SHOCKING! revelation that Putin’s gangsta state has been sneakily funding far-right propagandists in the United States has certainly caused A Splash. Not unreasonably, those at the centre…

slackbastard.anarchobase.com

The only reason they even wanted to talk to their shadowy benefactor was because his fake profile said he was into "social justice".

90% of Tim Pool's money

 

[peternorth]

If you don’t like it, leave.

Many outraged callers to 3aw today bemoaning the state of the state. Not without merit one must acknowledge. But don’t like it leave applies to everyone yes?

 

[Carringbush2010]

Not surprised at the use of 'if you don't like it leave' as, 'that's racist', no it isn't.

At worst, it's blunt. People need to stop being overly sensitive, and worse people need to stop feigning offence in bad faith in pursuit of their agenda.

On the flip side people need to stop using this term as an excuse to be racist.

The use of this from both angles is abhorrent.

 

[kickazz]

Not surprised at the use of 'if you don't like it leave' as, 'that's racist', no it isn't.

At worst, it's blunt. People need to stop being overly sensitive, and worse people need to stop feigning offence in bad faith in pursuit of their agenda.

On the flip side people need to stop using this term as an excuse to be racist.

The use of this from both angles is abhorrent.

Yeah if nothing else it's a refusal to counter criticism of (any) status quo with facts or logic.

 

[Carringbush2010]

Yeah if nothing else it's a refusal to counter criticism of (any) status quo with facts or logic.

For some yes, like I said, the term is being used in bad faith, depending on one's view.

If you have an actual look at the term itself it is certainly not offensive, it is only offensive if you go looking for the offence.

Fair argument that those who find offence to this term are either overly sensitive or are feigning sensitivity in bad faith. That's really the limit here.

So which is it?

 

[kickazz]

For some yes, like I said, the term is being used in bad faith, depending on one's view.

If you have an actual look at the term itself it is certainly not offensive, it is only offensive if you go looking for the offence.

Fair argument that those who find offence to this term are either overly sensitive or are feigning sensitivity in bad faith. That's really the limit here.

So which is it?

It is far from an offensive phrase. It is very, very defensive.

 

[Carringbush2010]

It is far from an offensive phrase. It is very, very defensive.

It is neither offensive or defensive, it is only either if one views it that way.

And that's the point, phrases like this which are just a term to explain something are hijacked for agenda purposes or people are just offended by it for no rational reason or used as an excuse to be racist.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Not surprised at the use of 'if you don't like it leave' as, 'that's racist', no it isn't.

At worst, it's blunt. People need to stop being overly sensitive, and worse people need to stop feigning offence in bad faith in pursuit of their agenda.

On the flip side people need to stop using this term as an excuse to be racist.

The use of this from both angles is abhorrent.

So you are saying it's not racist, unless it's being used by racists?

 

[Carringbush2010]

So you are saying it's not racist, unless it's being used by racists?

Umm no, I'm saying it's racist if that is the intent.

It's really not hard to figure out.

 

[Gethelred]

Umm no, I'm saying it's racist if that is the intent.

It's really not hard to figure out.

Dude, c'mon.

Intellectual superiority is - by far - the worst possible pose you could choose.

 

[skipper kelly]

Intellectual superiority

and moral superiority are 2 of the main driving forces behind internet arguing.