I was going to but thought I might have offended some so thought I would keep it as civil and restrained as possible.Come on, don't hold back.
Tell us what you really think.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I was going to but thought I might have offended some so thought I would keep it as civil and restrained as possible.Come on, don't hold back.
Tell us what you really think.
He has 2 nicknamesWhy does this picture say "The Warrior". Seriously? WTF
Just listened to Barrett's morning slot on trade radio. This bloke, after two weeks of adamantly stating our picks weren't enough and Freo were in the box seat, barely mentioned the Kelly trade at all even though at the time it was the only one to go through. Absolute flog of the highest order AND LOOK AT HIS ARMS.
View attachment 762217
Just listened to Barrett's morning slot on trade radio. This bloke, after two weeks of adamantly stating our picks weren't enough and Freo were in the box seat, barely mentioned the Kelly trade at all even though at the time it was the only one to go through. Absolute flog of the highest order AND LOOK AT HIS ARMS.
View attachment 762217
I don't know if it is quite right either , I think has just looked at it as the difference between Brad's 2020 salary with Freo compared to his reported St Kilda offer and multiplied by 5 . Forgetting that a lot of The Saints offer is front loaded as they have heaps of space for next year.Kim Hagdorn says that If Brad Hill doesnt make it to Saint Kilda next season He (Hill) will be two million dollars out of picket.lel
Probably true though.So not really biased or incompetent just funny.
Yeah there not normal arms, malnutrition?Just listened to Barrett's morning slot on trade radio. This bloke, after two weeks of adamantly stating our picks weren't enough and Freo were in the box seat, barely mentioned the Kelly trade at all even though at the time it was the only one to go through. Absolute flog of the highest order AND LOOK AT HIS ARMS.
View attachment 762217
From AFL.com
The one that got away: Who Eagles, Dockers drafted before Cats pounced on Kelly - http://m.afl.com.au/news/2019-10-12...-dockers-drafted-before-cats-pounced-on-kelly
fu** off, every single club passed on the guy multiple times.
He was 100% going to be drafted in 2017, and the cat's went way earlier than anyone could have predicted.
Would he player he is now if we'd drafted him earlier? Who knows.
Quality back to back coverage with absolutely no strong Vic Basis...
View attachment 763527
LOL @ Haselby on 6pr. Basically cherry picks a year (2015) and says you are giving all Eric Hipwood, Daniel Rioli and Ben Keys (who?) up for Tim Kelly.
Totally agree.From AFL.com
The one that got away: Who Eagles, Dockers drafted before Cats pounced on Kelly - http://m.afl.com.au/news/2019-10-12...-dockers-drafted-before-cats-pounced-on-kelly
fu** off, every single club passed on the guy multiple times.
He was 100% going to be drafted in 2017, and the cat's went way earlier than anyone could have predicted.
Would he player he is now if we'd drafted him earlier? Who knows.
I love how they’ve used the 01 super draft and f/s Gary Ablett as a yard stick for what they could do this year. Destined for successQuality back to back coverage with absolutely no strong Vic Basis...
View attachment 763527
I keenly recall this board in semi meltdown when we kept passing him over. It was a **** up. He did everything you could possibly do to be drafted after being injured in his draft year. Brilliant one touch goal kicking mid right under our noses and all along we're picking a succession of duds. I dont have confidence we even know how to judge young mids these days. Most of our mids now are recruits.From AFL.com
The one that got away: Who Eagles, Dockers drafted before Cats pounced on Kelly - http://m.afl.com.au/news/2019-10-12...-dockers-drafted-before-cats-pounced-on-kelly
fu** off, every single club passed on the guy multiple times.
He was 100% going to be drafted in 2017, and the cat's went way earlier than anyone could have predicted.
Would he player he is now if we'd drafted him earlier? Who knows.
I keenly recall this board in semi meltdown when we kept passing him over. It was a **** up. He did everything you could possibly do after being injured in his draft year. I dont have confidence we even know how to judge young mids these days.
I’m confused how we are copping a D now?
A harsh assessment, sure. And I have no idea how they reached that Carlton ranking.16. West Coast
IN – Tim Kelly + late picks
OUT – A future first round pick, Pick 14, Pick 24, Pick 33 + late picks
West Coast completely stuffed up the Tim Kelly situation in contrast to Geelong who played it beautifully. The Eagles refused to cough up for Kelly twelve months ago, meaning they missed out on having an All Australian midfielder complement their premiership defence that may have advanced further. Yet, they held out only for a significantly worse deal despite the fact that Kelly was no longer contracted. This is a message to other clubs, if you want a player just do the deal the first time or you pay for it later.
In comparison, Carlton's haul of Betts and Pinochet was enough for a top 4 position Meanwhile securing the best player in the entire trade period and improving our biggest weakness lands us in the bottom 4
https://themongrelpunt.com/afl-drafts-and-trades/2019/10/17/the-trade-ladder/
In 2018 Kelly had only one season of exposed AFL form, with significant support from the rest of the Geelong midfield (which dropped away this year). The deal we did was better value than the year before, even if we paid more.16. West Coast
IN – Tim Kelly + late picks
OUT – A future first round pick, Pick 14, Pick 24, Pick 33 + late picks
West Coast completely stuffed up the Tim Kelly situation in contrast to Geelong who played it beautifully. The Eagles refused to cough up for Kelly twelve months ago, meaning they missed out on having an All Australian midfielder complement their premiership defence that may have advanced further. Yet, they held out only for a significantly worse deal despite the fact that Kelly was no longer contracted. This is a message to other clubs, if you want a player just do the deal the first time or you pay for it later.
In comparison, Carlton's haul of Betts and Pinochet was enough for a top 4 position Meanwhile securing the best player in the entire trade period and improving our biggest weakness lands us in the bottom 4
https://themongrelpunt.com/afl-drafts-and-trades/2019/10/17/the-trade-ladder/
There are a stack of lazy journalists that are relying on comments from Geelong during the year that implied we could have had Kelly during 2018 trade period for our second rounders and 2019 first. This is a lie, which has been confirmed by comments from West Coast (recently Craig Vozzo after the trade went through). Geelong was playing games last year with no intent of trading him at all, we agreed to their demands on the last day but they kept shifting the goalposts. To make comments like "West Coast should have just paid everything in 2018 and made it happen" are complete BS, it wasn't an option unless we did something so stupid that Geelong couldn't say no.A harsh assessment, sure. And I have no idea how they reached that Carlton ranking.
There is a grain of reason in that statement that we should have just done the deal last year and it has cost us more as a result.
But that is with the benefit of hindsight. Last time around we were looking at Kelly on a mere one year of exposed form. I think few would have predicted that he would take his game up 3-4 levels and suddenly become AA/Top 5 Brownlow.