- Nov 30, 2006
- 4,023
- 7
- AFL Club
- Richmond
It's amazing how underrated Richmond are.
It's obvious the football world's opinions are rather unified when it comes to the once mighty Tigers. The roar is weak, the talent is never enough, and a wooden spoon seems favourable to offset their appetite.
How will this popular belief of Richmond sliding take place?
As a team that won 11 games in 2006 they need to become a team that is 8 games worse than the team we fielded last year.
New players include a fully fit Nathan Brown.
Okay, so far we have only improved the team by a massive amount.
Next we have Graham Polak. The subect of much debate when first traded for, a majority of Tiger fans are very happy we have him now. If he doesn't be a great player this year then he will at least free up Joel Bowden and will force Ray Hall out of the team.
Again, that is a large improvement on last year.
In defence we need a solid quality player with leadership. Lucky for us, Chris Newman is back. His leg break was a very "clean" one and he was running 6 months ago now unlike Nathan Brown's "messy" break. He will put a lot more steadiness and drive into the backline. Probably our next captain btw.
Now apart from big name inclusions improving our team by a good margin, we have a lot of young talent who are rippening as we speak. It is only natural for a team full of talented youngsters to produce several players who have "break out years" and take major leaps forward. This time last year Dean Polo was a no-name. Only took him 1 game to show he'll be a star.
Deledio, Tambling, Polo, Hughes, Meyer, JON, Schulz, Thursfield, Pattison, Howat, Raines and Foley will all be better players than last year.
Let's say hypothetically only Tambling and Deledio of that group really step up and the rest remain exactly the same. Does that make us better or worse than we were last year? We'd have one of the better midfields in the comp instead of the worst.
FWIW, Deledio is on fire, he got 30 possessions last week. Tambling was BOG. Jay Schulz is showing the same potential he showed when he kicked 6 goals on Mal Michael who was then in his prime.
The recruitment of Kent Kingsley has drawn some of you to the conclusion that he will single handedly drag us down the ladder. This is both unrealistic and stupid. Appreciate that he will make our team's depth better than it was last year to cover even more injuries (we had a terrible year last year injury wise). It was either him, or a speculative 18yo who wouldn't do a quarter of what Kingsley will. 20 goals from him would even be a nice little side bonus with Richo, Brown, Schulz, Pettifer, Deledio etc racking up goals.
Another little stat - last year Richmond received the LEAST amount of free kicks in the competition.
In a year with terrible injury problems to key players combined with being the worst treated team by the umpires and still managed 11 wins. We have thrown in several big name players and the natural improvement from our kids are solid indications of an improvement in 2007.
Where will our slide from 11 wins come from? How can we be a worse football team by 8 wins this year?
It's obvious the football world's opinions are rather unified when it comes to the once mighty Tigers. The roar is weak, the talent is never enough, and a wooden spoon seems favourable to offset their appetite.
How will this popular belief of Richmond sliding take place?
As a team that won 11 games in 2006 they need to become a team that is 8 games worse than the team we fielded last year.
New players include a fully fit Nathan Brown.
Okay, so far we have only improved the team by a massive amount.
Next we have Graham Polak. The subect of much debate when first traded for, a majority of Tiger fans are very happy we have him now. If he doesn't be a great player this year then he will at least free up Joel Bowden and will force Ray Hall out of the team.
Again, that is a large improvement on last year.
In defence we need a solid quality player with leadership. Lucky for us, Chris Newman is back. His leg break was a very "clean" one and he was running 6 months ago now unlike Nathan Brown's "messy" break. He will put a lot more steadiness and drive into the backline. Probably our next captain btw.
Now apart from big name inclusions improving our team by a good margin, we have a lot of young talent who are rippening as we speak. It is only natural for a team full of talented youngsters to produce several players who have "break out years" and take major leaps forward. This time last year Dean Polo was a no-name. Only took him 1 game to show he'll be a star.
Deledio, Tambling, Polo, Hughes, Meyer, JON, Schulz, Thursfield, Pattison, Howat, Raines and Foley will all be better players than last year.
Let's say hypothetically only Tambling and Deledio of that group really step up and the rest remain exactly the same. Does that make us better or worse than we were last year? We'd have one of the better midfields in the comp instead of the worst.
FWIW, Deledio is on fire, he got 30 possessions last week. Tambling was BOG. Jay Schulz is showing the same potential he showed when he kicked 6 goals on Mal Michael who was then in his prime.
The recruitment of Kent Kingsley has drawn some of you to the conclusion that he will single handedly drag us down the ladder. This is both unrealistic and stupid. Appreciate that he will make our team's depth better than it was last year to cover even more injuries (we had a terrible year last year injury wise). It was either him, or a speculative 18yo who wouldn't do a quarter of what Kingsley will. 20 goals from him would even be a nice little side bonus with Richo, Brown, Schulz, Pettifer, Deledio etc racking up goals.
Another little stat - last year Richmond received the LEAST amount of free kicks in the competition.
In a year with terrible injury problems to key players combined with being the worst treated team by the umpires and still managed 11 wins. We have thrown in several big name players and the natural improvement from our kids are solid indications of an improvement in 2007.
Where will our slide from 11 wins come from? How can we be a worse football team by 8 wins this year?