Hollow Knight
Imperfect vessel
- May 3, 2005
- 97,084
- 108,795
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- Scuderia Ferrari, Dallas Cowboys
Haven't seen the 7:30 report episode yet. Did they hint at who is doing the leaking of these emails?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Haven't seen the 7:30 report episode yet. Did they hint at who is doing the leaking of these emails?
Haven't seen the 7:30 report episode yet. Did they hint at who is doing the leaking of these emails?
If I had a dollar for every moron who compared Armstrong to Essendon.
Just highlighting your stupidity, the two cases could not be any more different.
Dank is under the impression that because AOD is a 'constituent of an approved' (his words), legal, topical weight loss cream, Bodyshaper Cellulite Contour Creme, Section 0 of the code would not apply.
Could any of the Google detectives find out whether this is actually the case?
I've just seen a screen shot on Bomberblitsz of another email from Dank to WADA, some words are blurred out and its hard to tell what it says but my interpretation of it is
Dank says he got a confirmation about AOD not being on the prohibited list and himself came to the conclusion it does not fall under S0, despite being told otherwise by WADA.
Here it is http://www.flickr.com/photos/85225270@N02/8701729170/in/photostream/lightbox/
Minor issue CHAS clinically trials have proven no perf enhancing properties. Kindly read the recent press release from the pharma company.And for those Essendon supporters who think that they are getting no benefits from last years supplement program, take a read of this.
http://m.heraldsun.com.au/afl/teams...sendon-took-them/story-e6frf9l6-1226634210537
Probably sleepingWhere are all the Essendon supporters at?
The company who are developing AOD have conceded it doesn't add muscle mass or repair cartilageAnd for those Essendon supporters who think that they are getting no benefits from last years supplement program, take a read of this.
http://m.heraldsun.com.au/afl/teams...sendon-took-them/story-e6frf9l6-1226634210537
Dank is under the impression that because AOD is a 'constituent of an approved' (his words), legal, topical weight loss cream, Bodyshaper Cellulite Contour Creme, Section 0 of the code would not apply.
Could any of the Google detectives find out whether this is actually the case?
In 2010, Phosphagenics launched its Elixia skincare range using its unique platform technology.
Personal care products are commercially attractive as they do not require large financial resources for product research and development, nor are they subject to the same stringent regulations as drugs. Products can be commercialised efficiently at less cost and risk.
Dank is under the impression that because AOD is a 'constituent of an approved' (his words), legal, topical weight loss cream, Bodyshaper Cellulite Contour Creme, Section 0 of the code would not apply.
Could any of the Google detectives find out whether this is actually the case?
Where has it been said AOD was used intravenously? I thought subcutaneous injections were suspectedThe product you speak of doesn't make Dank's case, as it's never been through a medical approval process. It gets around regulation by virtue of being a personal care product. It does contain AOD9604 (although the formulation was changed in late 2012, there is no information as to whether this was removed, but I doubt it would've been). It's produced by an Australian company that developed & patented the trans-dermal delivery method. This particular product was an attractive starting point for them to capitalise on that patent, precisely because it didn't have to pass the kind of stringent approval process that would be required for using AOD9604 itself, intravenously. To quote Phosphagenics Ltd's 2010 Annual Report
Minor issue CHAS clinically trials have proven no perf enhancing properties. Kindly read the recent press release from the pharma company.
Where has it been said AOD was used intravenously? I thought subcutaneous injections were suspected
The company who are developing AOD have conceded it doesn't add muscle mass or repair cartilage
Why would a bunch of supposedly underdeveloped players need a weight loss product anyway?
So dank alerts authorities is warned then uses it without good reasons. Tricks two doctors and two clubs. Yep. Story is finished. All info is out in the public domain..Ironically, the only fat bloke on your list has denied taking the stuff.
Not for ASADA to make a mistake and assume 1 covers allMy mistake, but you're splitting hairs. Both methods would require the same regulatory approvals.
It failed as weight loss tooIronically, the only fat bloke on your list has denied taking the stuff.
Time to head for the lifeboats.Not for ASADA to make a mistake and assume 1 covers all
So dank alerts authorities is warned then uses it without good reasons. Tricks two doctors and two clubs. Yep. Story is finished. All info is out in the public domain..