- May 5, 2016
- 46,116
- 51,658
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Or common sense
how?
how does common sense tell you this when there is literally no historical precedence on which to base it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Or common sense
There's no need for historical precedent, looking at the circumstances of the different teams and the season reveals multiple factors that would be more challenging to some clubs than others, that would be detrimental to performance, that would be physically and mentally challenging or disruptive. We dont need 10 years of data to back up every comment.how?
how does common sense tell you this when there is literally no historical precedence on which to base it.
You are in the wrong thread. We are comparing which is the worst team to be second on the ladder. All second on the ladder teams have high win loss ratios.Mate, seriously, why do people bother with this sh*t? It means nothing dissecting the minuscule details of who they beat and how much by. They’re second on the ladder. They’ve got the points. Come finals, do you think they’ll sit around before the first game telling one another they are the worst second placed side ever?
This means nothing. It’s a nothing point. The only time you take things seriously are in finals. The home and away just judges your ladder position. Cue Bulldogs in 16 and any team that’s won a flag from outside the top 2. Could any team from 1-8 win it? Yes. Is it likely the premier comes from the top 4? Statistically, yes.
So what is the point of pointing out that fact when the end game is a GF that doesn’t discriminate by a win loss ratio?You are in the wrong thread. We are comparing which is the worst team to be second on the ladder. All second on the ladder teams have high win loss ratios.
dont know why you are bringing up the bulldogs in 2016. Thats an example to use to argue why we should not have finals. Has notihng to do with who is the worst 2nd on the ladder side.
reaching a grand final is not the end goal of this thread. Its just to rank where teams of similar win loss ratios sit relative to each other.So what is the point of pointing out that fact when the end game is a GF that doesn’t discriminate by a win loss ratio?
I would rate Geelong 2019 up there too, awful second half of the season and the first minor premiers to lose the qualifying final since Adelaide in 2005Fremantle in 2015 were pretty awful too. Scraped over the line against a lot of ordinary teams. Hard style of footy to watch as well.
Adelaide were probably the best side two years running (05-06) but just choked in the finals. How they didn’t at least make a GF is beyond me. I am pretty sure they had WC on the ropes in the 06 PF and just blew it in the last quarter.I would rate Geelong 2019 up there too, awful second half of the season and the first minor premiers to lose the qualifying final since Adelaide in 2005
reaching a grand final is not the end goal of this thread. Its just to rank where teams of similar win loss ratios sit relative to each other.
brisbane has played 3 games outside its state in which it has only one other competitor (gold coast). This is an advantage unseen in afl history. Of the three it played outside of qld it got smashed in two of them and one of them was a neutral game. We know a massive interstate advantage exists.why deny its giving unprecendeted advantages to brisbane? If they were winning by 50 points each week you would say the interstate advantage probably wasnt impacting the win loss ratio. But many of their wins have been close which suggests that without the home advantage they would probably be sitting at the bottom of the top eight. Maybe even outside it.
Hahahahahaha what even is this. Round 1 was a complete write off, the players didn't even want to be there. Since the restart we've won 10 games and lost 2 in Richmond and Geelong.
Geelong we should've put away in the 1st qtr and had 1 bad qtr for the entire game. Won the other 3.
Richmond we were more than a year younger, coming off a 4 day break vs 6 day and had more players out in key areas than Richmond.
Basically, we are 10-2 post restart after having 1 bad quarter against the Cats and losing a game we were never favourites against the Tigers. If we kicked a bit better this wouldn't even be a conversation. Maybe Gold Coast should try winning some games past round 6?
Looking forward to bumping this thread come October.
I find it baffling that people try and answer this question using literally nothing more than 'they haven't travelled much.' So what? What should they have done?
Beat by 5-6 goals awful teams like Melbourne and North Melbourne rather than scrape over the line at the death.
Be competitive against teams below them on the ladder like Richmond and Geelong rather than uncompetitive.
2018 we had 6 odd games decided by under 2 goals which we lost. 2019 we ended up turning those close losses to wins. This year our goal kicking has turned to poop.Had a lot of close games fall their way last year (much like this year) and a fairly easy draw. Were shown up in the finals.
I feel like they are in reality a midtable side but had results fall their way with an easy draw last year and will play 85% of their games in QLD this year.
Good on them, they're a fun side to watch, but they are in reality at the level of a midtable side. It's way Fagan is blowing a gasket more and more he can see they've stopped improving and are only surviving on the back of never leaving their home state.
I don't expect Brisbane to even finish top 2. So I don't think you can say they are the worst side.
2018 we had 6 odd games decided by under 2 goals which we lost. 2019 we ended up turning those close losses to wins. This year our goal kicking has turned to poop.
Not completely disagreeing with you. But not sure we don't necessarily not deserve to be where we are.
Beat by 5-6 goals awful teams like Melbourne and North Melbourne rather than scrape over the line at the death.
Be competitive against teams below them on the ladder like Richmond and Geelong rather than uncompetitive.
Like Saints, WC, Port (above us), WB? You can't have it 1 way but not the other. If you are going to say something like that, put all the information out there rather than the 2 we have lost (Against Geelong, we had 1 bad quarter but we beat them for the other 3 quarters, l would say that is competitive), just so that it suits your narrative. We have beaten every side in the top 8 except for 2 and we are playing the other next week which we will be favourites in.Beat by 5-6 goals awful teams like Melbourne and North Melbourne rather than scrape over the line at the death.
Be competitive against teams below them on the ladder like Richmond and Geelong rather than uncompetitive.
Well thanks to you lot we are now third (angry emoji).Have you won more games than, or an equal amount of games to, with a better percentage than, 16 other sides in the AFL premiership? If yes, then of course you deserve to be where you are.
For sure.A couple of years ago we were the "best" bottom 4 team ever, now we are the "worst" top 2 side. I know which one I prefer!