TradeDraft
Post-Human
Typical Media Shitting on Collingwood as UsualLMAO this latest video is when Crisp was 19 and at the Lions. Are the media ******* serious atm.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Typical Media Shitting on Collingwood as UsualLMAO this latest video is when Crisp was 19 and at the Lions. Are the media ******* serious atm.
Definitely a more serious allegation here. Being gang r*ped is far more serious, although dating back over 40 years won't impact the playing group today.Ex-Cats player sues club over alleged gang rape, failing to protect him from sexual abuse
The Geelong Football Club is being sued by a former footballer who claims he was gang r*ped by three older players at a Cats’ residence for country recruits.
A former Geelong footballer has accused a trio of players of a historic gang rape as he sues the Cats for failing to protect him from sexual abuse.
The ex-player claims he was just 15 or 16 when he was cornered in the shower at the club’s Aberdeen House, a residence for country recruits, and sexually assaulted by three older athletes in the early 1980s.
The man, a prominent Indigenous Elder now in his late 50s, filed Supreme Court action against the Cats this week for a trial by jury, claiming the club had a “duty to take reasonable care of his welfare, safety and supervision” while he was living at the football house as a minor.
“My client has shown a lot of courage and strength in coming forward about his abuse,” said Arnold Thomas & Becker lawyer Angela Di Carluccio.
“He is a proud and well respected Indigenous man who has fought hard in his life to overcome his trauma and to contribute positively to his community.”
The former sportsman, who does not wish to be named, had played for the club’s Under 19s side but left the game soon after the alleged assault.
In documents before the court, he claims the Cats were “vicariously liable for the abuse” because they employed the three alleged perpetrators.
Those three players have not been named in the writ, and have not been added as co-defendants.
“(Geelong FC) placed senior players in a position where they had authority, power, trust, control and the ability to achieve intimacy over the plaintiff, which afforded them the opportunity to abuse (him),” the document states.
“The Plaintiff was vulnerable by reason of his age, displacement from family and dislocation from his home.”
The writ, which has been served to the club, also alleges that Geelong FC failed to protect minors from abuse, to separate minors from adults at Aberdeen House, to supervise the house parent and provide channels to report incidents.
As a result of the alleged assault, the ex-player claims to have suffered a psychiatric injury that led to a loss of earnings and earning capacity, and medical and like expenses.
Ms Di Carluccio said the Cats had “a duty to care for his welfare and safety” while he lived at the property.
“There was a failure to properly supervise Aberdeen House or separate my client from players who were adult men,” she said.
A Geelong FC spokeswoman said the club was unable to comment.
During a recent sale of Aberdeen House, the vendors reported that people in the community would walk up to them and tell them of the Cats’ link to the property, and that they “went to some wild parties here”.
A listing agent selling the home in 2021 told the Geelong Advertiser it was purchased by the club during its 1963 premiership year, and operated as a residence for country players.
100% It's another form of victim blaming.Blaming the person whose intimate images have been shared/leaked without their consent is like blaming someone for being assaulted for walking alone at night. The blame lies solely on the person sharing the images/committing the assault.
In which case the video is old not new.
Crisp is the least of the AFL's worry
It will be overtaken by the Rape allegations against 3 Geelong players
Crisp is the least of the AFL's worry
It will be overtaken by the Rape allegations against 3 Geelong players
They'll say they can't talk about the Geelong allegations because of legal reasons & confidentiality.. but continue to discuss JC's punishment before he's even been interviewed & continually share the intimate pics without his consentMedia will try and make the Crisp/Collingwood thing is Worse
Bloody well saidBlaming the person whose intimate images have been shared/leaked without their consent is like blaming someone for being assaulted for walking alone at night. The blame lies solely on the person sharing the images/committing the assault.
The best way to handle the media shitting on us is not to give it anything to shit on us about. Most other clubs don't have to deal with media scrutiny because their players don't publicly screw up. For years, Collingwood players have managed to find new ways to attract media attention and this will be the second occasion this year we have been in the media spotlight, and we are only 4 games into the season.Typical Media Shitting on Collingwood as Usual
Given how difficult a sexual assault claim against 3 people from 40 years ago will be to prove, I think Crisp's case is more immediately relevant - unless the videos are in fact ancient artifacts and not something recently produced.Media will try and make the Crisp/Collingwood thing is Worse
ExactlyBlaming the person whose intimate images have been shared/leaked without their consent is like blaming someone for being assaulted for walking alone at night. The blame lies solely on the person sharing the images/committing the assault.
So long as when an AFL player is caught sharing images of, say, a nude female, I do so hope the Heraldsun attack the female for taking lewd photos of herself.
I don't care what images an AFL player shares - so long as he (or she) doesn't play for Collingwood.So long as when an AFL player is caught sharing images of, say, a nude female, I do so hope the Heraldsun attack the female for taking lewd photos of herself.
I don't care what images an AFL player shares - so long as he (or she) doesn't play for Collingwood.
AFL has to get their shit together on this stuff and get someone in who knows what they're doing to write some policies and protocols of how to respond. At the moment they're treating of each incident as a PR spot fire which they deal with by punishing the player. It is just encouraging the media and offering no protection to players at all. This shit is going to keep going and rather than protecting the brand their compliance with the media is going to encourage it and thus further damage the brand as well as the players.Blaming the person whose intimate images have been shared/leaked without their consent is like blaming someone for being assaulted for walking alone at night. The blame lies solely on the person sharing the images/committing the assault.
This is also what I thought of Collingwood’s handling of the De Goey situation.AFL has to get their s**t together on this stuff and get someone in who knows what they're doing to write some policies and protocols of how to respond. At the moment they're treating of each incident as a PR spot fire which they deal with by punishing the player. It is just encouraging the media and offering no protection to players at all. This s**t is going to keep going and rather than protecting the brand their compliance with the media is going to encourage it and thus further damage the brand as well as the players.
Yep it's ****edCrisp does nude photos. How disgusting.
20 million women on OF's. How empowering.
FMD this world is s**t.
I agree with that yes. I want the ****ing grub that posted it brought to justiceI reckon there won’t be any AFL punishment.
It’s usually the clubs that dish out the punishment to appease the AFL.
The Pies will know his version and still played him on Thursday. They would have left him out/suspended him if they thought he’d done wrong.
That’s my take.
Shouldn't be hard to trace if they really wanted toI agree with that yes. I want the ******* grub that posted it brought to justice
I reallly hope Crisp is lawyering up and exploring every opportunity he has available to fight back against both the media and potentially the AFL.
I just don't see how the AFL could possibly sanction a victim of a crime based on personal photos taken when they were a teenager nearly a decade ago and not be facing potential legal retaliatory action itself.