E92_
Premium Platinum
Love that he's antivax considering all the stories about him during his youth with "medications"... and to a latter extent his early playing days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This could be a good thing as we can finally play Brander in his normal pos.......................
I really do wonder how this plays out for him. Covid clearly isn't going anywhere, neither are the mandates.
What will change after standing down?
This Dr's certificate stuff is interesting. I hope he takes legal action against the club/AFL because thats what needs to be done. We have courts to sort out these kind of complicated issues, hopefully Jacks the sort who believes in his principles enough to go there. So far as I'm aware these mandates have been tested twice and both times the court has come down on the side of the challenger. In the US they have been abandoned by so many companies its not funny due to employees actually testing whether these kind of things are legally binding. We should see where things sit in Australia, and it'll take a person of means to do that. Hopefully the media continue to slander him into going down this path.
Where in Australia did they test the mandates and win? Only successful one I'm aware of was BHP being in trouble for not communicating it well enough at a site, but it didn't stop them from still implementing at a later date.
2 cases have already failed
Where in Australia did they test the mandates and win? Only successful one I'm aware of was BHP being in trouble for not communicating it well enough at a site, but it didn't stop them from still implementing at a later date.
2 cases have already failed
Shocked to be sitting here right nowCalling a temporary injunction and a delay to implementing the mandate as wins is stretching it a bit....
Meanwhile you dont want to acknowledge the two cases where they were dismissed, and the challenger forced to pay the court fees?
Some very dubious fact presentation from yourself
Wonder if Jack's a Meatloaf fan...
Do I think Jack is actually probably an unfortunate 5g in the jab type of "antivaxer" rather than a "hey I'm fit and healthy and have next to zero chance of being damaged by Omicron but a 1 in 2500 chance of a career ending heart injury from the jab" type of common sense "antivaxer"... Yes.
Like you? Reckon this is the first post I’ve seen of yours outside of posting apocryphal YouTube links and other assorted quackery in the Covid thread.
Its an AFL rule not a madical issue. As side comment, no vaccination no travel. Thats not what you want as an AFL player - get to your place pf work?I think the requirement that Jack Darling be vaccinated is pointless, now that the characteristics of Omicron are clear.
He poses barely more threat to those around him than those who are double-vaccinated.
He is vanishingly unlikely to require the services of our hospitals.
Vaccination, for someone as young and fit as Jack, reduces any COVID risk - to him, to others or to society at large - by only a very small degree. I do not think this justifies compelling him to be vaccinated.
Having said this, I do question his motivation, and his appraisal of the evidence. The vaccination risk is really minuscule, and he's setting that against years of his career.
Yes, there are plenty of rules. Government rules on travel, AFL mandates on vaccination. I just don't think they're all justified, especially given the current state of the pandemic.Its an AFL rule not a madical issue. As side comment, no vaccination no travel. Thats not what you want as an AFL player - get to your place of work?
I think the requirement that Jack Darling be vaccinated is pointless, now that the characteristics of Omicron are clear.
He poses barely more threat to those around him than those who are double-vaccinated.
He is vanishingly unlikely to require the services of our hospitals.
Vaccination, for someone as young and fit as Jack, reduces any COVID risk - to him, to others or to society at large - by only a very small degree. I do not think this justifies compelling him to be vaccinated.
Having said this, I do question his motivation, and his appraisal of the evidence. The vaccination risk is really minuscule, and he's setting that against years of his career.
I mean, would you be surprised?Oh great so Jack's a flat earther now too?
Dont pay your tax then. There are decisions and consequences.Yes, there are plenty of rules. Government rules on travel, AFL mandates on vaccination. I just don't think they're all justified, especially given the current state of the pandemic.