Rumour Jack Steven Stabbing Incident

Remove this Banner Ad

Anyways we are drifting off topic, point i made initially still stands and that is Stevens has taken up his natural right under law that he has
no obligation to tell the queens soldiers anything,with all due respect to the queen & those who are a bit sensitive to other views
 
Last edited:
lumpinee said:
Anyways we are drifting off topic, point i made initially still stands and that is Stevens has taken up his natural right under law that he has
no obligation to tell the queens soldiers anything,with all due respect to the queen & those who are a bit sensitive to other views
Click to expand...

His name is Jack Steven. Not Jack Stevens.

And it's the AFL's right to suspend him from playing for bringing the game/organisation into disrepute until he cooperates.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Bostonian said:
His name is Jack Steven. Not Jack Stevens.

And it's the AFL's right to suspend him from playing for bringing the game/organisation into disrepute until he cooperates.
Click to expand...
And a fair chance they will. He's been stabbed for F*&k sake. He may not care about the law, but pretty certain he cares about getting paid to play AFL. Will all come out. Always does.
 
That would be simply incredible for someone to have been a victim of a very serious domestic violence attack and then be coerced by their employer with the threat of pay being witheld because they were too uncomfortable to speak with police.

That is the kind of thing that documentaries would be written about in years to come if the idebties of the victim and perpetrator suited a narrative.
 
ABSOLUTE MADMAN said:
That would be simply incredible for someone to have been a victim of a very serious domestic violence attack and then be coerced by their employer with the threat of pay being witheld because they were too uncomfortable to speak with police.

That is the kind of thing that documentaries would be written about in years to come if the idebties of the victim and perpetrator suited a narrative.
Click to expand...

A) How do you know he was the victim?
B) How do you know it was very serious?
C) How do you know it was domestic violence?
D) How do you know he's being coerced?
E) If pay is withheld, how do you know it's because he wouldn't speak with police?
F) How do you know it was uncomfortableness that caused him to stay silent?

Other than all those assumptions, this is a tragedy of natural justice.
 
Carl Spackler said:
A) How do you know he was the victim?
B) How do you know it was very serious?
C) How do you know it was domestic violence?
D) How do you know he's being coerced?
E) If pay is withheld, how do you know it's because he wouldn't speak with police?
F) How do you know it was uncomfortableness that caused him to stay silent?

Other than all those assumptions, this is a tragedy of natural justice.
Click to expand...
The comment is simply based on everyone else's hypotheticals. It is a hypothetical itself. However B is pretty obvious.
 
ABSOLUTE MADMAN said:
That would be simply incredible for someone to have been a victim of a very serious domestic violence attack and then be coerced by their employer with the threat of pay being witheld because they were too uncomfortable to speak with police.

That is the kind of thing that documentaries would be written about in years to come if the idebties of the victim and perpetrator suited a narrative.
Click to expand...

We don't know he's the victim.

He may have received the injury by being the instigator.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Bollox said:
Sorry don't have a great deal of time today, but wouldn't mind clarification of what I have gleaned so far.

A depressed and drug fuelled schizoid Jack was followed by his schizo missus who was enraged when she spotted him rooting his new girlfriend (or having a homosexual tryst with another guy named Jack) then stabbed him in the chest coming extremely close to killing him, just before he could meet up with his meth dealer who may have also stabbed him if his missus hadn't done it first. Afterwards our man Jack chose not to cooperate with the cops by making a statement, and the AFL has hence decided his rights are not as important as the AFL's right to be able to fine him for something they don't know anything about.
In the meantime the AFL would now like to pretend it has a right to determine acceptable behaviour when you simply feel like a root.
Close enough ?
Click to expand...
Everyone down at AFL House simply left when the restrictions started and just switched off the lights.
It's just the cleaners answering the phones these days.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Jack Steven Stabbing Incident

Similar threads

Kangaroos4eva
Scandal Jack Ziebell coward punched
8 9 10 11 12
Replies
285
Views
25K
Lavender Bushranger
L
Smiley Boy
Rumour Jack Crisp
8 9 10 11 12
Replies
297
Views
35K
Engimal v3
E
Lingsface
Rumour Jack Martin is Ray Martins son
Replies
16
Views
4K
Bogart
Bogart

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top