i assume you understand free agency
I think if we keep him at the Saints next year that he'll retire. He wants to be closer to his family I get that.
He'll end up at Geelong next year. But not for free.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
i assume you understand free agency
No one except Geelong it seems, they are not being forced to take him.mitch clark is a prime example, lets not get excited about what players did 2-3 years ago
massive risk, that no-one wants to take
this is really simpleI think if we keep him at the Saints next year that he'll retire. He wants to be closer to his family I get that.
He'll end up at Geelong next year. But not for free.
we have said at that price - no thanks and have walked awayNo one except Geelong it seems, they are not being forced to take him.
this is really simple
geelong will offer pick circa 40 and thats it
- if st kilda do the right thing he will walk away from his contract and sign a 2 year deal with geelong based on incentives low base
st kilda needs picks, and i get it, but geelong are not going to burn them, he was overweight and could not play more than a handful of games this year
lets not be precious
st kilda can not be locked into stevens for another 12months
he has said he would waive salary requirement if traded to geelongProbably accurate. I think if Geelong offered to take on his salary + a third rounder would be sufficient for us.
We'll flick that pick over to Port for Paddy Ryder, job done.
Yeah but we can easily pay his salary we don't need a salary dump, that is not a problem. Geelong however can't pay his salary. So if they want him they will need us to pay his wages, I presume they do want him given all the talk over the past 6 months and the years of tapping him up before that. We have lots of space in the salary cap and no picks, you have no salary cap space and lots of picks, or you will once Kelly is completed, seems a straight forward transaction, give us something we can use to get our trades done and we pay the wages. Maybe you are right though perhaps your lot are looking for an excuse to back out of the commitment they made to him.
he has said he would waive salary requirement if traded to geelong
i think everyone is playing games for now
this will get done, and it will not be done for pick 20
It's too bad we don't have the option to have conditional draft picks like they have in the NFL. I think from everyone's perspective if it was pick 40 with a 2020 2nd round pick attached on the proviso that he plays more than 18 games next year. I think then everybody would be happy.
How do you 'understand' geelong are walking away from the trade? And yes, more than happy to keep him.So from what I understand Geelong is walking away from this trade, the Saints want more than Geelong can afford. I personally think it's best for all parties involved except for maybe Jack himself but he has the option to retire or play another year for the Saints and then doing what he likes.
Saints fans would you be happy if you retained Steven?
What do you mean? Wells said negotiations are too far apart. How else should I have worded it?How do you 'understand' geelong are walking away from the trade? And yes, more than happy to keep him.
I think every Saints fan would love Steven to stay.So from what I understand Geelong is walking away from this trade, the Saints want more than Geelong can afford. I personally think it's best for all parties involved except for maybe Jack himself but he has the option to retire or play another year for the Saints and then doing what he likes.
Saints fans would you be happy if you retained Steven?
Could easily mean you're trying to low ball us too?What do you mean? Wells said negotiations are too far apart. How else should I have worded it?
What are you on about? Where did I say St Kilda was being unreasonable? I said Geelong can't afford what they want.Could easily mean you're trying to low ball us too?
Yes, of course.So from what I understand Geelong is walking away from this trade, the Saints want more than Geelong can afford. I personally think it's best for all parties involved except for maybe Jack himself but he has the option to retire or play another year for the Saints and then doing what he likes.
Saints fans would you be happy if you retained Steven?
Saints fans would you be happy if you retained Steven?
Geelong would be very happy because they'd make sure he only plays 17.I think then everybody would be happy.
Not 100% sure that's the caseNo one except Geelong it seems, they are not being forced to take him.
I think pick 36 is the part of the Venn diagram which overlaps. Half way between a pick in the 20s and a pick in the 50s.Don't see what St Kilda get out of letting him go for pick 57. Can't really see them being able to get any of their targets for that pick.
I know there is a thought that he'd retire if he doesn't get the move. Maybe Saints will be good guys and say "you've given us 10 good years, we don't want you to have to retire so here's you're move" but they'd be well in their right to ask for 36 or keep him to his contract. Theres really no difference to the Saints whether he retires or plays for Geelong