Neither does Saints Bigfooty.You do realise that you don't get to determine the trade, right?
Sam Power does though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Neither does Saints Bigfooty.You do realise that you don't get to determine the trade, right?
Never said the Saints board did.Neither does Saints Bigfooty.
Sam Power does though
No kidding.Never said the Saints board did.
You can declare a certain pick will need to be used all you want but reality says it will be less than what you personally want and more than what Saints supporters want it to be.
You do realise that you don't get to determine the trade, right?
It will be 46 with a nothing pick coming back to usNo kidding.
Noone realistically thinks pick 24 is it.
But it's not the less than 46 saints supporters want either.
It will be more than pick 46
No one is desperate for a 2024 Jack Macrae.If he was being pushed out, Dees, Geelong and North have all offered picks better than 43 for him.
Saints are desperate for him and came to him.
Most saints supporters seem to agree that pick 46 is more than fair, I haven't seen too many posts suggesting it should be less.No kidding.
Noone realistically thinks pick 24 is it.
But it's not the less than 46 saints supporters want either.
It will be more than pick 46
Where's this melt? Can you link it? Wasn't able to find it on the Saints board.Saints board going off with an impressive melt. But the best and fairest speech whinge prior to free agency and how Battle was treated is a-ok.
No one is desperate for a 2024 Jack Macrae.
Two posts directly above yours as an exampleMost saints supporters seem to agree that pick 46 is more than fair, I haven't seen too many posts suggesting it should be less.