Scandal Jaidyn Stephenson - Betting on Pies games

[Asapartyhat]

I was thinking if Petrachelli kicked five against Port and Walters kicked six against Port how many would the speediier Stephenson kick.Then I checked they already played he only kicked four.Weak effort **** him.Eight weeks a big long counciling session with some leftist feminist.One of those on line courses that takes hours and no thai massage afterwards.

 

[Vindicater]

What did Shaw get? He missed like half a season right?

 

[emblurr]

I'll start the over/unders markets off

How long will Jaidyn Stephenson get banned for?

Over 9.5 games, 1.88
Under 9.5 games, 1.88

 

[Wayne Dwop]

 

[NonPhixion]

Will be out till Rd 23

 

[outabounds]

Will be out till Rd 23

I think you will be right.

 

[Art Corvelay]

Yep

If they re watch that game (which they will)and if he is found to have even given off one handball to Pendles, he is ******

I doubt it - what are they going to say? Handballing to Pendles is hardly something out of the ordinary, even if it contributes to the bet.

 

[NaturalDisaster]

I doubt it - what are they going to say? Handballing to Pendles is hardly something out of the ordinary, even if it contributes to the bet.

Doesn’t matter

He would still be influencing his possession count therefore increasing the likelihood of winning his own bet.

How good Pendles is or how much players love giving the ball to him means nothing here. He would still be directly manipulating the outcome.

 

[The Warlord]

Is there a matrix of responsibility we can refer to here?

 

[Rohan25]

Shaw, Maxwell, Crisp, Sier - doesn’t say much for the intelligence of any Collingwood player if the lesson hasn’t sunk in by now.

 

[Big Unit 30]

You still won't beat us.

You won’t beat Geelong or WCE.
So let’s holiday together

 

[Cold Sober]

If he took a bonus bet does the penalty double.

 

[GROTTO]

Doesn’t matter

He would still be influencing his possession count therefore increasing the likelihood of winning his own bet.

How good Pendles is or how much players love giving the ball to him means nothing here. He would still be directly manipulating the outcome.

I dont think you can draw that conclusion definitely.

Placing a bet and influencing a result need to be proven and I dont think its possible to arrive here unless the player admits to it.

If he has placed a bet on the AFL, then thats conclusive. Whether he influenced the result, that still needs to be proven by the integrity unit. Which is much more damning on him if he has been found to do so.

 

[GROTTO]

If he took a bonus bet does the penalty double.

What if it was a bonus bet? Technically some of those bets, need to be turned over a few times before receiving any of it.

So basically he could have placed zero dollars of his own money on a result.

Highly doubt this is the case, but it changes things a bit here for him. Possible loophole.

 

[kickazz]

Give him 8 weeks off, upon resumption any future free kicks received must be turned over.

 

[Art Corvelay]

Doesn’t matter

He would still be influencing his possession count therefore increasing the likelihood of winning his own bet.

How good Pendles is or how much players love giving the ball to him means nothing here. He would still be directly manipulating the outcome.

I really don’t think the AFL will care that much. I’ve not said whether I agree with that stance or not.

If the bet was on a negative result for Collingwood, i.e. Pies losing, I could see them cracking down harder.

 

[kickazz]

Yep

If they re watch that game (which they will)and if he is found to have even given off one handball to Pendles, he is ******

It's not just that.

Merely being at a team meeting where it is confirmed that Pendles will play on the ball as usual is inside info.

Yes, most punters can assume that. But they don't KNOW it.

That knowledge might only shift odds from say $2.20 to $2.18 but it is still inside info and still corrupt.

 

[Beerfish]

Is there a matrix of responsibility we can refer to here?

Not sure. Maybe they should relocate him to Tasmania and make him rattle tins as punishment.

 

[Leviathan Pie]

If he took a bonus bet does the penalty double.

Has to turn-over the winnings

 

[NonPhixion]

Collingwood addressing issue at 4PM...

 

[The Warlord]

Not sure. Maybe they should relocate him to Tasmania and make him rattle tins as punishment.

Back on topic, I don't think the AFL will do too much, Collingwood are after all a big club.

Only small clubs get the treatment.

 

[Art Corvelay]

Collingwood addressing issue at 4PM...

I hope scaly mates have gone into hiding.

 

[mellowyellow]

I’m saying they wouldn’t bother investigating minnow clubs like North or Tigers for rules infractions, wouldn’t sell papers. As if Collingwood players are the only ones dumb enough to bet on AFL.

Settle down princess

 

[The Warlord]

I’m saying they wouldn’t bother investigating minnow clubs like North or Tigers for rules infractions, wouldn’t sell papers. As if Collingwood players are the only ones dumb enough to bet on AFL.

As if North players have the munny to bet lolz.

 

[Taylor]

Betting agencies are very happy to take the player's money in gets.

No so happy when they win.