Traded Jake Stringer [traded to Essendon]

[Runk]

Nobody loves Essendon.

NOBODY

Essendon supporters?

 

[Outback Footy]

So I guess that means you are in the camp that says picks in the 20s are have value to the Bullies.



Que? Have you been reading this thread?

No matter, register 1 vote for the WB supporters who think that picks in the 20s have value.
I guess the consequence of this is that you think the first offer was bad, but the current offer is good?

Yeah, Nah.

Register 1 vote for a fan who believes Jake is worth an early first rounder. Period. Every day of the week. Dodo got greedy and stuffed up the deal. I think both offers are shite and I hope my club doesn't accept the current one. Your future 1st would do it, and we can swap our future 3rd for your first. No strings, no steak knives. Easy. Job done.

 

[evo]

I reckon Adrian "woke up this morning feeling like P Diddy"

 

[Wild Bill]

We gave Melbourne an AA defender for Pick 29... They definitely love us

Overs for Melksham - Unders for Hibberd.

You gave the Dees a defender. He became an AA once he left.

 

[Beerfish]

Oh good. It hasn't happened yet.

 

[NTBlue]

http://www.afl.com.au/news/trade/trade-talk

"Super Tuesday might have delivered


That brings Tuesday to a close and there was a bit more movement. Jack Watts to Port Adelaide was the big one, Brandon Ah Chee to West Coast also happened, but time for deliberations is fast running out.


Tomorrow brings us 'Big Wednesday' with the expectation that there will be more clarity over the playing futures of Bryce Gibbs, Charlie Cameron, Gary Ablett, Jake Stringer, Lachie Weller and Jake Stringer, among others.


But what we can say with reasonable certainty that we won't be getting close to the 36 players who changed clubs this time last year.


We are in the home stretch now of the NAB AFL Trade Period. Join us again from 8.30am AEDT tomorrow for real time news and analysis as things happen. And keep visiting AFL.com.au for all the latest footy news."



According to AFL.com there are 2 Jake Stringers. Wonder who will trade for the second one?

 

[DapperDon]

Overs for Melksham - Unders for Hibberd.

You gave the Dees a defender. He became an AA once he left.

Melksham played like we got unders for him too, Goodwin knows how to get the best out of him.

 

[reload141]

Can this trade just get done so I can watch the Celtics play?

 

[mickd]

Melksham played like we got unders for him too, Goodwin knows how to get the best out of him.

Hibberd was a big loss. He is a gun

 

[DapperDon]

Hibberd was a big loss. He is a gun

Most certainly.

 

[Bigfell]

I’m hearing that the deal for stringer to the bombers has been agreeded to. Not sure how true this is, but the person who said it has been reliable in the past.

 

[boncer34]

I’m hearing that the deal for stringer to the bombers has been agreeded to. Not sure how true this is, but the person who said it has been reliable in the past.

It has. The Dogs are just working on the press release outlining how they gave us pick 9 as well.

 

[yodellinhank]

Don't say you weren't warned...

Thanks for the heads up

P.S. You think the bombers should revise their offer?

 

[HirdyLannister]

I’m hearing that the deal for stringer to the bombers has been agreeded to. Not sure how true this is, but the person who said it has been reliable in the past.

Of course it has, has been for days. Why else is Jmac and big bad Gordo shopping our second rounders.

 

[yodellinhank]

According to AFL.com there are 2 Jake Stringers. Wonder who will trade for the second one?

GWS have pick 11, but they'd want something back their way...

 

[Sentinel]

I’m hearing that the deal for stringer to the bombers has been agreeded to. Not sure how true this is, but the person who said it has been reliable in the past.

To be fair, your 2 other posts (both on this matter) have been inaccurate so there's no reason to believe this - what happened to Monday or Tuesday?

Not that I don't think the deal will get done eventually.

 

[GetDimmaBack]

Thanks for the heads up

P.S. You think the bombers should revise their offer?

Just need to ask yourselves why no-one else wants him.

 

[DanA]

It has. The Dogs are just working on the press release outlining how they gave us pick 9 as well.

My source can confirm, Dogs list management team just need 20 more minutes sitting on an ice pack and they'll be ready to talk to the press.

 

[yodellinhank]

Just need to ask yourselves why no-one else wants him.

Because the bulldogs are too hard to deal with? That was the cats reason for walking away.

 

[GetDimmaBack]

Because the bulldogs are too hard to deal with? That was the cats reason for walking away.

ha ha ha haa

You're funny

 

[Bigfell]

To be fair, your 2 other posts (both on this matter) have been inaccurate so there's no reason to believe this - what happened to Monday or Tuesday?

Not that I don't think the deal will get done eventually.

On Monday it was Saad, Tuesday was to be stringer but you guys keep mucking around.

 

[Beerfish]

Just need to ask yourselves why no-one else wants him.

According to some it's because the #essendonmafia made sure there were no other suitors.

 

[60sbomber]

Yeah, Nah.

Register 1 vote for a fan who believes Jake is worth an early first rounder. Period. Every day of the week. Dodo got greedy and stuffed up the deal. I think both offers are shite and I hope my club doesn't accept the current one. Your future 1st would do it, and we can swap our future 3rd for your first. No strings, no steak knives. Easy. Job done.

"an early first rounder"?? How early? Earlier than 11, I take it, from your comment that both offers are shite.
How then do you come to the conclusion that our future 1st would do it, with your future 3rd coming back?
Firstly our future 1st could well be worse than 11, and secondly, that deal sounds very like the original one WB knocked back (except for the difference between giving back a future 3rd versus 2017 2nd, which is not much different)

 

[KnaveyBlue]

I’m hearing that the deal for stringer to the bombers has been agreeded to.

 

[Dave]

Is that you Barrett?

Could be, like the bespectacled one he appears not to understand the concept