Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Still got another appeal first.I wouldn't be shocked with how hard we pushed in terms of our lawyers approach, Sicily & the expert that we will appeal at the courts.
Not that it really matters but it shouldn't need to effect his AA chances. If they decide he's the best performed then it shouldn't matter if he played less games. Stewart got in last year on that logic.3 matches for that is absolutely ridiculous.
Will be another AA year robbed from Sicily.
Should be a 3 time AA at least if not for injury, selector incompetence and now unjust suspensions.
Sent from my SM-S916B using Tapatalk
Here's the difference, Sicily is not Stewart.Not that it really matters but it shouldn't need to effect his AA chances. If they decide he's the best performed then it shouldn't matter if he played less games. Stewart got in last year on that logic.
Yeh but Stewart is yet another love child from that * of a club, and this is SicNot that it really matters but it shouldn't need to effect his AA chances. If they decide he's the best performed then it shouldn't matter if he played less games. Stewart got in last year on that logic.
It almost feels like the AFL is trying to get a club to take a case to the courts so they can establish ‘reasonable’ risk and actions to prevent head injuries. It’s a contact sport that is inherently dangerous and potentially debilitating. For non-head injuries this seems to be a well-established and accepted risk of the game. Head injuries seems to be floating around this absolutist position that ‘reasonable’ means no risk, which given the nature of the activity is obviously not reasonable. Given this hasn’t been tested in Australian courts, nor the damages established, it feels to me as if the AFL is squeezing tighter and tighter until either a player or club takes them to court.