MRP / Trib. James Sicily - 3 weeks for dangerous tackle - SUSPENSION STANDS!

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

As annoyed as what I am with this it's going to be interesting to see how other coaches, players and the media react to this. On the bright side if there was one way to ensure that we're still in the running for a bottom 3 pick then thanks (or tanks) AFL for making that easier to happen.

All I ask from this now is that we throw DGB into the deep end to play Sics role as an interceptor sink or swim. It could end up being the making of him.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I wouldn't be shocked with how hard we pushed in terms of our lawyers approach, Sicily & the expert that we will appeal at the courts.
Still got another appeal first.
Given its a bye week, we should then appeal that.

We haven't won a tribunal decision in nearly 20 years. League out to get us
 
3 matches for that is absolutely ridiculous.

Will be another AA year robbed from Sicily.

Should be a 3 time AA at least if not for injury, selector incompetence and now unjust suspensions.

Sent from my SM-S916B using Tapatalk
Not that it really matters but it shouldn't need to effect his AA chances. If they decide he's the best performed then it shouldn't matter if he played less games. Stewart got in last year on that logic.
 
Not that it really matters but it shouldn't need to effect his AA chances. If they decide he's the best performed then it shouldn't matter if he played less games. Stewart got in last year on that logic.
Here's the difference, Sicily is not Stewart.
 
Not that it really matters but it shouldn't need to effect his AA chances. If they decide he's the best performed then it shouldn't matter if he played less games. Stewart got in last year on that logic.
Yeh but Stewart is yet another love child from that * of a club, and this is Sic
 
It almost feels like the AFL is trying to get a club to take a case to the courts so they can establish ‘reasonable’ risk and actions to prevent head injuries. It’s a contact sport that is inherently dangerous and potentially debilitating. For non-head injuries this seems to be a well-established and accepted risk of the game. Head injuries seems to be floating around this absolutist position that ‘reasonable’ means no risk, which given the nature of the activity is obviously not reasonable. Given this hasn’t been tested in Australian courts, nor the damages established, it feels to me as if the AFL is squeezing tighter and tighter until either a player or club takes them to court.

tenor.gif
 

Remove this Banner Ad

MRP / Trib. James Sicily - 3 weeks for dangerous tackle - SUSPENSION STANDS!

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top