News Jnr Rioli - He’s back.

[ConcreteWaters]

At a guess: 33 months offered based on penalties handed out for other urine substitution examples, we say 2 years, settle on 27-30 months enabling him to be back for 2022 with hopefully a full preseason at the club.

As a hope- ASADA have really stuffed up in their process somewhere which is why they're taking so long to try and cover their bases and he's back sometime next year.

 

[Cuzz09]

Don't forget the Parmi Vs Parma debate

On SM-G925I using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Fatty rules]

Anything less than the full 4 years and WADA will appeal it. Cant see him getting anything less than a career ending ban unfortunately.

If that happens, it will be decided in Lausanne, by a cabal which is outside the rule of law.

 

[RookiePick]

2 years with 6 months of that suspended

I'll have some of what you're smoking.

That would be a brilliant outcome. Magical fairyland levels of good.

 

[Obeanie1]

Recent offences and time taken for hearings..

Thomas/Keefe (Collingwood) - 9 months

Crowley (Fremantle) - 11 months

Murray (Collingwood) - 13 months

Rioli (West Coast) - 13 months, no hearing set....

This is an absolute disgrace.

The AFL does not want this heard in season. Niether does the Eagles.

They want it sorted a month post season coming into December when everyone is over the season, post draft.

People this is all about dealing with a sh!t situation as quietly as possible.

 

[Cuzz09]

Rioli a chance tonight?

On SM-G925I using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[insidious]

I personally reckon Willie has been treated like shit over this it's not right

On CPH1921 using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[UseR2006]

Article in the west regarding gills issues with the rioli case and the delays, can anyone access? locked behind paywall

 

[Ochre]

Article in the west regarding gills issues with the rioli case and the delays, can anyone access? locked behind paywall

 

[THE A5]

Willie Rioli hits out at 'cheat' claims in deleted video

The provisionally suspended West Coast star has sent a message to his 'doubters' as he waits for ASADA to rule on his AFL career.

7news.com.au

 

[ChampRevesby]

View attachment 989461

View attachment 989462

How are they doing a "magnificent job" if they are not doing this more expediently?

 

[squashface]

Willie Rioli hits out at 'cheat' claims in deleted video

The provisionally suspended West Coast star has sent a message to his 'doubters' as he waits for ASADA to rule on his AFL career.

7news.com.au

3 months old, chief

 

[Bacchus]

Jaidyn Stephenson

2

Jaidyn Stephenson

Age

25

Ht

189cm

Wt

79kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

13.2

3star

K

8.8

3star

HB

4.4

3star

M

4.7

4star

T

2.6

4star

G

1.5

5star

D

11.0

3star

K

6.7

3star

HB

4.3

3star

M

3.5

3star

T

2.7

4star

G

1.2

5star

D

12.6

4star

K

8.0

3star

HB

4.6

4star

M

3.4

4star

T

3.4

5star

G

1.4

5star

had more than half of his penalty as suspended sentence (10 weeks + 12 weeks suspended sentence).
Why can‘t Rioli has something similar?

2 years with 6 months suspended - effectively 18 months.

 

[Miguel Sanchez]

Is there any power to suspend part of a sentence for a WADA code breach? I can’t recall it happening before.

Possibly because a second conviction would be pretty much career-ending, so there’s not much point tacking on a few extra months.

 

[shooshka]

Is there any power to suspend part of a sentence for a WADA code breach? I can’t recall it happening before.

Possibly because a second conviction would be pretty much career-ending, so there’s not much point tacking on a few extra months.

There doesn't seem to be that option - probably because as you say the second offence would be career-ending. That is how WADA/ASADA do it..

The perplexing part is the Stephenson one, where the AFL gave him 12-weeks suspended as part of his sentence - surely a second offence would or should also be career ending for him (assuming it was a gambling issue - I guess in theory if he had a Crouch-style incident his 12-week suspended sentence could be added - but surely if he got caught betting on himself again it would be curtains and the 12-weeks would be moot?)

 

[pantskyle]

Hopefully the media attention and annoyance at how long this is taken means some leniency on the final ban, might be able to shave a few months off.

 

[THE A5]

3 months old, chief

Ahaha Ch7 reposting old news on twitter I guess. Journalism has ****en succumbed to this shit now.

 

[Ochre]

How are they doing a "magnificent job" if they are not doing this more expediently?

I think that's just politics. He made it clear it's not a smart move for him to criticise them.

 

[flyinghi64]

ASADA offices,
Hey Bob how are you going with that Rioli case?
What do you mean, I though Trev was sorting that one out.
Mate, Trev hasn't worked here since the Covid thing happened and he was part of the cull.
Cull? I thought we put more on?
Yeah but that was management, they don't do the actual work.
Mmmm, I don't know then. Maybe Deb might know, she generally knows most things going on.
etc etc etc

 

[suntagonal]

What would everyone think if it was 4 years with 2 years suspended?

Apologies if this has been mentioned before.

 

[dewcefault]

What would everyone think if it was 4 years with 2 years suspended?

Apologies if this has been mentioned before.

So basically two years. You'd think that's an acceptable outcome. Misses all of next season as well which is tough but WC should keep him on the list.

Has ASADA ever given suspended sentences though?

 

[MaxHunt]

This is an interesting read. Apologies if already posted

Junior hurdles champion Daniela Roman lashes out at drug testers

Facing a 16-month ban from all sport for refusing to produce a urine sample, Australia's junior 100 metres hurdle champion Daniela Roman has lashed out at "clueless and unprofessional" testers.

www.smh.com.au

 

[JohnW]

So the no leeway 4 years or bust crew are wrong?

I remember reading the the treat no sample/tampering in as the same thing?

 

[Broken_Chairs]

So the no leeway 4 years or bust crew are wrong?

I remember reading the the treat no sample/tampering in as the same thing?

It all depends on context, and we have none yet.

Incompetent testers or a rubber dong? Who knows? Any reasonable mitigating factors? No one knows.

 

[Alesana]

Mitigating circumstances should be a factor. Giving a false sample because you're worried about the weed you smoked does not carry the same weight as providing a false sample because you're worried about the PEDs you took to gain an unfair advantage