- Sep 22, 2011
- 42,033
- 91,766
- AFL Club
- Essendon
That's part of the problem. The media are letting their personal feelings and dealings with Jobe influence their ability to report on the issue. As a result, they come across as trying to protect one of their own (which they are). If the media put aside those feelings, and reported on the issue with a mindset to let the public make up their own minds (don't try to tell the masses what to think), then it would actually result in less hatred.
In fact, if the media played a neutral bat with this issue more often, then I daresay a majority of people would feel more comfortable recognising Jobe's good qualities themselves, without feeling like they're being told to admire him because he's a good bloke. If he's a good person, have faith those qualities will shine through naturally and people will notice for themselves. He's obviously a good bloke IMO, but don't tell me to admire him and insult my intelligence by spinning the facts related to the PEDS saga. It only triggers an antagonistic response.
Do we really need to have a conversation about what the role of a writer is?
Of course their personal feelings come into it, that's what being an opinion writer is.
It's not 1955. The media don't report stories and leave it. Twitter does that.
"Stop telling me what to think"... if you can't handle articles that don't agree with your own viewpoint then don't read them.
There's a lot of people outside those on here, the "keyboard neanderthals" as Caro put it, that think Jobe as acted in a classy and honourable manner, and they have sympathy for him.
Deal with it. Or don't. But let's not go with this crap about it being some sort of Orwellian mind control situation.