AgreedYeah, especially if port lose.
But the fact its been over 10 days post exit meetings and we are none the wiser on what he wants to do, probably doesn't bode well for us.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
AgreedYeah, especially if port lose.
But the fact its been over 10 days post exit meetings and we are none the wiser on what he wants to do, probably doesn't bode well for us.
Especially if the team they are considering is still playing finals.
Hopefully will get an answer next week
Hopefully last night's pitiful response has turned him right off PortYeah, especially if port lose.
But the fact its been over 10 days post exit meetings and we are none the wiser on what he wants to do, probably doesn't bode well for us.
Or the fact they had no real functioning forward line, he may see a position for himself there. And lets be honest, they could use him lolHopefully last night's pitiful response has turned him right off Port
If I was a forward at Port I'd be more worried about how the ball was going to be delivered to me ..Or the fact they had no real functioning forward line, he may see a position for himself there. And lets be honest, they could use him lol
What I noticed last night, they had plenty of inside 50's.. but maybe it was how it was being delivered, but it was getting in there at least. Dixon should not be playing. They only had 4 less inside 50's (53 v 57) but couldn't capitalise. Maybe thats the forwards. Maybe thats the delivery.If I was a forward at Port I'd be more worried about how the ball was going to be delivered to me ..
If I was a forward at Port I'd be more worried about how the ball was going to be delivered to me ..
Almost every single inside 50 was bombed on their forwards heads. Often to outnumbered forwards. Many entries but horrible way of bringing it inside.If I was a forward at Port I'd be more worried about how the ball was going to be delivered to me ..
I'm just being selfish & want Joe to choose us.What I noticed last night, they had plenty of inside 50's.. but maybe it was how it was being delivered, but it was getting in there at least. Dixon should not be playing. They only had 4 less inside 50's (53 v 57) but couldn't capitalise. Maybe thats the forwards. Maybe thats the delivery.
I feel like the club is dangling him out there as trade bait to get a solid pick, because we have a lot of small forward talent already. If we really wanted to retain him we would match the 3 years at the very least. We offered Frampton 3 years so why wouldn't you offer Richards who I think can be a good player, 3 years?I'm just being selfish & want Joe to choose us.
I certainly wouldn't be feeling excited about playing for them after that performance. So hopefully he feels the same way
Perhaps he'll wait to see if they move Hinkley on. That's what I'd be waiting for.
Smart by us, imo. If a club wants him, pay up. If not, we keep him.I feel like the club is dangling him out there as trade bait to get a solid pick, because we have a lot of small forward talent already. If we really wanted to retain him we would match the 3 years at the very least. We offered Frampton 3 years so why wouldn't you offer Richards who I think can be a good player, 3 years?
I would expect that if a club tries to under pay for him we may make that 3 year offer or threaten to, to up the offer.
I feel like the club is dangling him out there as trade bait to get a solid pick, because we have a lot of small forward talent already. If we really wanted to retain him we would match the 3 years at the very least. We offered Frampton 3 years so why wouldn't you offer Richards who I think can be a good player, 3 years?
I would expect that if a club tries to under pay for him we may make that 3 year offer or threaten to, to up the offer.
Tbf, when he got injured in the Dockers game, that was a setback. Then he got ill when next selected.The club didn't rate Richards as best 22, so maybe they just don't rate him as much as the fans do?
Tbf, when he got injured in the Dockers game, that was a setback. Then he got ill when next selected.
For all we know, if he didn't get that injury, he may have played every game for the rest of the season, such was his form at the time.
His form wasn't quite at the same level as it was before his injury, a bye or 2 in the VFL..it all contributed.When he was fit later in the season he either didn't play or was sub.
Plus they were totally out-coached by Chris Scott who basically had all of his small to medium-sized players running non-stop in a forward direction & so continually getting behind the Port Adelaide defence & mid-fielders. Moreover if Geelong had kicked more accurately in the 1st half, then the final margin could have been greater than 84 points.Almost every single inside 50 was bombed on their forwards heads. Often to outnumbered forwards. Many entries but horrible way of bringing it inside.
Cats have been doing that all year though. Their forwards clear out the forward line and then stream forward into space. I wouldn't know how to defend it, but I could have told Kenny that's what they'd do.Plus they were totally out-coached by Chris Scott who basically had all of his small to medium-sized players running non-stop in a forward direction & so continually getting behind the Port Adelaide defence & mid-fielders. Moreover if Geelong had kicked more accurately in the 1st half, then the final margin could have been greater than 84 points.
It means nothing given they have released these videos ofMy theory is… if the club is releasing a feel good statement on social media about a player… they won’t do it unless he is staying.
Or … at worst… they think a little love might be enough to sway him from the dark side.