Podcast Joe Rogan - Tricked again!

Remove this Banner Ad

White people aren’t the only ones who can be selfish/ignorant/greedy/bigoted/religious/conspiracy nut. There’s your reasons champ.
Yeah good one.

So non-white people who think Trump is racist against them will vote for him because they are racists themselves?

Oh Lordy.
Easy

Many cultures still hold traditional gender roles within the household. Basically men work and women stay at home and take care of the kids and the house. This value is still practised heavily within Europe, Midde East, Asia, South America and Africa. Prominantly amongst older generations.

But there is also a massive under current of Misogyny in many cultures including White. So essentially Harris only crime in her polling results would be nothing more than she is a women and even more of a crime her skin dares to hold colour. And women themselves are some of the worst when it comes to misogyny.

To sum up, If Harris was a 45yo white man she would be smashing Trump out of the election race and it would be called already. We all know this. MAGA just get offended when we call it for what it is. So it rarely gets mentioned but history tells you that one women lost to Trump already, a decrepid old white man won and now a black women is struggling to get the win she should get easily. Why is that? Had Clinton been a man, Trump would have lost the first time too. Apparently when it comes to elections sexual predators are allowed to win if its against a women.
Straw man.

Next.
 
Yeah good one.

So non-white people who think Trump is racist against them will vote for him because they are racists themselves?

Oh Lordy.

Straw man.

Next.

Ahh the good old deflect because you have nothing to say. What a fail. Either comment with a legit argument or stop trolling.
 
Ahh the good old deflect because you have nothing to say. What a fail. Either comment with a legit argument or stop trolling.
why do radical leftists always resort to insults. It’s like the default rule when your logic is flawed. Just call someone racist, bigot, transphobe, troll, grifter, etc when you’ve got nothing else. It’s pathetic.

God I can’t wait for Trump to win in November and watch all of you lose your collective minds. You lot actually have a mental disorder buying into all of the fear mongering the MSM fills your brains with.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

why do radical leftists always resort to insults. It’s like the default rule when your logic is flawed. Just call someone racist, bigot, transphobe, troll, grifter, etc when you’ve got nothing else. It’s pathetic.

God I can’t wait for Trump to win in November and watch all of you lose your collective minds. You lot actually have a mental disorder buying into all of the fear mongering the MSM fills your brains with.

I didnt insult you. Im also not a radical leftist. Again, proof of a fail. Resort to MAGA labels is the best you got?

Its not logic pal!

As I have said previously

anyone who votes for Trump is either

  • Rusted on republican
  • Racist
  • Misogynist
  • Dumber than a box of rocks.

I will leave you to decide which category you fall in.

Oh and Trump wont win. Lol you are number 4 if you think so.
 
Straw man.

Next.
How is this a strawman?

A strawman is when someone twists your argument into a weaker version that they then proceed to beat. You asked a question, and they answered it; you don't have to agree with their answer, but you cannot simply dismiss that answer with a reference to a logical fallacy that you either failed to understand or deliberately misused.
why do radical leftists always resort to insults. It’s like the default rule when your logic is flawed. Just call someone racist, bigot, transphobe, troll, grifter, etc when you’ve got nothing else. It’s pathetic.
An Ad Hominem attack is an attack on someone's character rather than their argument; in footy parlance, it's playing the man not the ball. That post does not do this; it points out that you attempted a dismissal of their post that didn't really work with a little mild ridicule to serve as seasoning.

This is a long established tradition in rhetoric, RBTL. You are allowed to lampoon those you disagree with, provided you defeat their arguments as well; an ad hominem attack doesn't engage their argument, merely attacks them. Do you see the difference?
God I can’t wait for Trump to win in November and watch all of you lose your collective minds. You lot actually have a mental disorder buying into all of the fear mongering the MSM fills your brains with.
See, I think this is interesting but a bit sad.

You imagine everyone else to be asleep, dreaming; lulled into a false sense of reality by lies peddled by those with microphones. But the person you're advocating to break this up is - almost to the exclusion of all else - an infamous liar. He literally said, during a debate: "They're eating the pets of the people who live there." concerning Haitian migrants who were in Springfield legally. Is this not fearmongering in your eyes? If I were to list every single occurrence of Trump trying to breed fear or community discontent, we would have to ask for more site bandwidth, but that's immaterial to what I'm saying here. I don't want to get into a tit for tat; that's not what this post is for.

The real reason this is interesting is that it demonstrates the degree to which you've doubled down. As Macbeth would have it, you've stepped in so far that, should you wade no more, returning would be as tedious as going to the other side. It's easier, you see, to do what you're already doing than it is to stop.

But you should stop, RBTL. You don't have to discard everything else that makes you who you are; you can still be right wing, still believe in RW principles and economic theories. You can still think that lefties are... well, whatever you think we are. But don't allow Trump to be the entirety of your identity to the point that you think everyone who disagrees with you suffers from mental health issues.

It's not fair to them, and it's not fair to you to isolate yourself like this.

Now, I'm also not a Yank, so I'm not asking you to enact a public vocal retraction. Just, reconsider how you post on the American election, please. Do it for your own sake.
 
Last edited:
Easy

Many cultures still hold traditional gender roles within the household. Basically men work and women stay at home and take care of the kids and the house. This value is still practised heavily within Europe, Midde East, Asia, South America and Africa. Prominantly amongst older generations.

But there is also a massive under current of Misogyny in many cultures including White. So essentially Harris only crime in her polling results would be nothing more than she is a women and even more of a crime her skin dares to hold colour. And women themselves are some of the worst when it comes to misogyny.

To sum up, If Harris was a 45yo white man she would be smashing Trump out of the election race and it would be called already. We all know this. MAGA just get offended when we call it for what it is. So it rarely gets mentioned but history tells you that one women lost to Trump already, a decrepid old white man won and now a black women is struggling to get the win she should get easily. Why is that? Had Clinton been a man, Trump would have lost the first time too. Apparently when it comes to elections sexual predators are allowed to win if its against a women.

It may also depend on said candidate's policies, ability to connect with people, navigating the Democrat party, few other less important things!
 
Trump was twice impeached as President, he's on bail awaiting sentencing for 34 fraud convictions with other cases still pending, he's a court adjudicated rapist who stole from children's cancer charities and people are worried about Harris. Ffs the stupidity is off the charts at the moment
 
What's Bill Clinton got to do with this?

Trump is a sex predator, dont excuse it. He is also a rampant pedophile proven to be on Epstein Island numerous times. But again, you look the other way because he suits your narrative. Sad that people like you excuse this behaviour. Youre also ****ing Aussie and the fact you know this behaviour wouldnt fly in Aussie politics is ****ing disgusting. Wouldnt even surive in society yet you ****ing make excuses for that ****ing dog. what is wrong with you!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Trump is a sex predator, dont excuse it. He is also a rampant pedophile proven to be on Epstein Island numerous times. But again, you look the other way because he suits your narrative. Sad that people like you excuse this behaviour. Youre also ****ing Aussie and the fact you know this behaviour wouldnt fly in Aussie politics is ****ing disgusting. Wouldnt even surive in society yet you ****ing make excuses for that ****ing dog. what is wrong with you!

It may also depend on said candidate's policies, ability to connect with people, navigating the Democrat party, few other less important things!

You ignored my point here, but fair enough.

Oh and you have a potty mouth.
 
You ignored my point here, but fair enough.

Oh and you have a potty mouth.

because its trash and complete bonkers to suggest Trump has even said a single policy. So there is no comparison. You just dont like Kamala because she is girl and that offends you so you prefer a sex predator and youve been called out.
 
because its trash and complete bonkers to suggest Trump has even said a single policy. So there is no comparison. You just dont like Kamala because she is girl and that offends you so you prefer a sex predator and youve been called out.
Nobody wants to admit they like Trump, so it all has to be about how awful Harris is.
 
Nobody wants to admit they like Trump, so it all has to be about how awful Harris is.
And sadly given America's non-compulsory voting it's a very effective mindset. Don't need to get people to vote for Trump, just need to erode their desire to stand in a line all day to vote for Harris (or anyone else).
 

 
Thats the first id heard of him and that first impression is complete rubbish. As if the msm are adversarial ffs. Clown take
Eh? Harris' Fox interview was pretty adversarial. You could even mount an argument that her 60 Minutes was, and it definitely was in comparison to the Rogan interview.

The strange part is anyone expecting the JRE interview to be any different.
 
Last edited:
1730249020608.png
Agree with this, plus Rogan parrots a lot of RW bullshit that’s blatant misinformation such as Democrats supporting illegal immigration to get votes.

Treating a billionaire tax dodging war criminal sex criminal felon lying fascist campaigner like Trump as one of the boys is technically within Rogan’s legal rights but I think he sucks **** for it and sucks some more for buying into so much bullshit such as Trump being anti war and pro free speech. He’s not.

Rogan is brain dead, Covid broke it and he’ll never get over the lockdowns and mandates because he’s a marshmallow toe.
 
I don't think you know what Critical Race Theory is

Or you are just using it as a catchall for things you don't like (a bit like woke).
None of them do, it is a textbook example of the right-wing media fed culture war. All buzz words and distortions, or outright lies.
 
So Harris declined to go to Rogans studio in Austin and be interviewed on the JRE experience. Her demands to Rogan were fly out to wherever Harris is campaigning, and only do 1 hour.

She basically made an offer that she knew Rogan wouldn’t accept to get out of it. Trouble is Kamala is way behind in the betting markets and she NEEDS to make up ground on Trump.
 
So Harris declined to go to Rogans studio in Austin and be interviewed on the JRE experience. Her demands to Rogan were fly out to wherever Harris is campaigning, and only do 1 hour.

She basically made an offer that she knew Rogan wouldn’t accept to get out of it. Trouble is Kamala is way behind in the betting markets and she NEEDS to make up ground on Trump.
Why can't Rogan go to her? Can he not set up a temporary studio?

Seems like Rogan made a offer that he knew Harris wouldn't accept.
 
So Harris declined to go to Rogans studio in Austin and be interviewed on the JRE experience. Her demands to Rogan were fly out to wherever Harris is campaigning, and only do 1 hour.

She basically made an offer that she knew Rogan wouldn’t accept to get out of it. Trouble is Kamala is way behind in the betting markets and she NEEDS to make up ground on Trump.
Why does Kamala need to gain ground in the betting markets?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Podcast Joe Rogan - Tricked again!

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top