Podcast Joe Rogan - Tricked again!

[the_interloper]

He’s the best, the greatest, nobody does podcasts like Joe Rogan! Tiny hands, though, and you know what they say about tiny hands.

Little Joe Rogan is great, though, tiny though but he’s got one hell of a kick, just imagine what he could do if he was big like me.

I read that in Trumps voice and it seems legit I must say

 

[SnakeMan86]

Then why did he act surprised that Trump won? Was he not implying that if he’d lost it was because “they” were gonna steal it from him? Think about it. “Turns out voting is real.” Well yeah, no shit, you only just got the memo on that did ya Joe?

It was a bit. Good lord.
He spent a whole podcast on the day with Tim Dillon, genuinely not sure who would win. Never once hinting at shenanigans.

Your hatred for someone you no longer listen to is bizarre.

I've despised Alan Jones for years... You know what I do? Not listen to him. I don't go into threads or discuss his nonsense.

What lies? And state of the last 4 years? You think Trump’s 8 trillion dollar deficit had nothing to do with it?

In any other world, if someone hired an 80 year old with Alzheimers, the employees would be pretty pissed, I know we would.

Can you seriously not see how infuriating it is that anyone supports that orange campaigner, including Rogan? It’s just sad man, this billionaire campaigner doesn’t give a **** about the common folk.

I actually couldn't personally give 2 shits who supports who. Especially as an Australian. Touch grass.

I know the Democrats suck but I just don’t see the level of vindictiveness from them that I do from Trump.

That's right, they sucked. And if your gonna wheel out someone new, with 3 months to go of a campaign, after listening to the ramblings of an old man, don't be surprised if the American public didn't trust them.
The country voted for Trump. The people voted him in. Be angry at them. But that was there choice.

Rogan fans would say he’s soft with everyone but I don’t buy he would’ve gone as easy on Kamala as he did on Trump. I genuinely think he’s a stupid person who constantly falls for crap like when Jamie fact checked him about co2 volcanic emissions.

Meh, just your own blind hatred opinion. I take him on face value, based on the thousands of interviews that came before.

 

[bourbons]

Funny how Rogan believes in voting when Trump wins but doesn’t when he loses.

Yeah saw that, "so... voting is actually real", said with wide eyed wonder

Turning into a bit of a caricature ol' Joe

 

[bourbons]

When did he not believe in the voting?
There's at least 6 podcasts where he mentioned he tried to get proof out of Trump, but he played word roller-coaster.

Pretty clear from the statement I just mentioned his take would have been quite different had Harris got up.

 

[Coolangatta]

It was a bit. Good lord.
He spent a whole podcast on the day with Tim Dillon, genuinely not sure who would win. Never once hinting at shenanigans.

Your hatred for someone you no longer listen to is bizarre.

I've despised Alan Jones for years... You know what I do? Not listen to him. I don't go into threads or discuss his nonsense.


In any other world, if someone hired an 80 year old with Alzheimers, the employees would be pretty pissed, I know we would.


I actually couldn't personally give 2 shits who supports who. Especially as an Australian. Touch grass.

That's right, they sucked. And if your gonna wheel out someone new, with 3 months to go of a campaign, after listening to the ramblings of an old man, don't be surprised if the American public didn't trust them.
The country voted for Trump. The people voted him in. Be angry at them. But that was there choice.

Meh, just your own blind hatred opinion. I take him on face value, based on the thousands of interviews that came before.

Australia is impacted by who the idiots in America put into office, though.

Yes, Biden should’ve stepped down two years ago and they should’ve let the voters nominate their preferred candidate of choice but still, Kamala was miles better than Trump.

80% of people prefer her policies but it’s not policies that win elections apparently, it’s vibes and personality and people unable to see how past terms impact the present.

 

[bourbons]

It was a bit. Good lord.

 

[HirdsTheWord]

Australia is impacted by who the idiots in America put into office, though.

Yes, Biden should’ve stepped down two years ago and they should’ve let the voters nominate their preferred candidate of choice but still, Kamala was miles better than Trump.

80% of people prefer her policies but it’s not policies that win elections apparently, it’s vibes and personality and people unable to see how past terms impact the present.

I certainly agree that Biden not stepping down earlier massively hindered their election chances but where did you get the 80% of people preferred Kamala's policies from?

This was the first time in almost 20 years that a republican has won the popular vote, so I'm not sure that is correct?

If the democrats had a proper primary vote, I very much doubt Harris would have won it. I think the democrats needed a clean break from Biden to win the election, which they could have if given the correct amount of time with Biden dropping out much earlier.

 

[bourbons]

I certainly agree that Biden not stepping down earlier massively hindered their election chances but where did you get the 80% of people preferred Kamala's policies from?

This was the first time in almost 20 years that a republican has won the popular vote, so I'm not sure that is correct?

If the democrats had a proper primary vote, I very much doubt Harris would have won it. I think the democrats needed a clean break from Biden to win, which they could have if given the correct amount of time with Biden dropping out much earlier.

Not sure about 80% of people, but a majority prefer Harris' policies even amongst Republicans (once those policies are de-coupled from the party promoting them of course lol)

Republicans favoured Kamala Harris's policies in blind polling

Kamala Harris’s policies were preferred by Republicans to Donald Trump's in blind polling carried out ahead of the election.

www.thelondoneconomic.com

 

[HirdsTheWord]

Not sure about 80% of people, but a majority prefer Harris' policies even amongst Republicans (once those policies are de-coupled from the party promoting them of course lol)

Republicans favoured Kamala Harris's policies in blind polling

Kamala Harris’s policies were preferred by Republicans to Donald Trump's in blind polling carried out ahead of the election.

www.thelondoneconomic.com

I wouldn't trust polling numbers, would use it as a very loose guide only.

Polling had this election tight, turned out to be a complete landslide.

it could also be the case that the majority of people preferred Harris policies but the more core policies like economy etc went trumps way and maybe more people valued that higher which decided their voting choice.

IE, personally Socially i am far more liberal (anti-abortion, gay rights etc etc) where economically I'm far more conservative, so in an election what do I value more? if that makes sense?

 

[bourbons]

I wouldn't trust polling numbers, would use it as a very loose guide only.

Would have to be seriously out of whack to alter the main takeaway (that being far more of Harris' policies are broadly popular than Trump's), like it would have to be a margin of error of about 20%. I know polls haven't been that reliable but no professional poll is going to have an error margin of that size. This poll also had a bit bigger sample size than traditional election polls if I'm understanding correctly.

Wouldn't have thought the idea that large numbers of people vote against their own interests is all that debatable, certainly in the US.

Polling had this election tight, turned out to be a complete landslide.

It really wasn't, Trump just managed to flip the 3 'blue wall' states

Wisconsin, won 49.7% to 48.8% (30k votes)
Michigan, won 49.7% to 48.3% (80k votes)
Pennsylvania, won 50.4% to 48.7% (100k votes)

Not exactly a clobbering.

 

[HirdsTheWord]

Would have to be seriously out of whack to alter the main takeaway (that being more of Harris' policies are broadly popular than Trump's), like it would have to be a margin of error of 20%. This poll also had a bit bigger sample size than traditional election polls if I'm understanding correctly.

Wouldn't have thought the idea that large numbers of people vote against their own interests is all that debatable, certainly in the US.

Meh could very well be.

These pollsters were way off on the main election so IMO you take the rest with a grain of sand. But i get your point.

 

[bourbons]

Meh could very well be.

These pollsters were way off on the main election so IMO you take the rest with a grain of sand. But i get your point.

I don't think they were?

ie. they had the swing states I mentioned as basically toss ups, Trump ended up winning them by a point or 2. Maybe technically outside the margin of error but only just. They are still under polling the Trump vote somewhat but nothing like the discrepancy in '16 and '20.

 

[HirdsTheWord]

It really wasn't, Trump just managed to flip the 3 'blue wall' states

Wisconsin, won 49.7% to 48.8% (30k votes)
Michigan, won 49.7% to 48.3% (80k votes)
Pennsylvania, won 50.4% to 48.7% (100k votes)

Not exactly a clobbering.

I suppose that's down to ones perspective.

they are called blue wall states for nothing.

For trump to win those & win the popular vote, something that hasn't been done in 20 odd years, id call that a clobbering.

Anyways I get your perspective, so all good.

 

[Chief]

Yeah saw that, "so... voting is actually real", said with wide eyed wonder

Turning into a bit of a caricature ol' Joe

Apparently clipped, but no link or time stamp given for the full Experience of that part of Jogan's show.