Podcast Joe Rogan - Tricked again!

[the_interloper]

He’s the best, the greatest, nobody does podcasts like Joe Rogan! Tiny hands, though, and you know what they say about tiny hands.

Little Joe Rogan is great, though, tiny though but he’s got one hell of a kick, just imagine what he could do if he was big like me.

I read that in Trumps voice and it seems legit I must say

 

[SnakeMan86]

Then why did he act surprised that Trump won? Was he not implying that if he’d lost it was because “they” were gonna steal it from him? Think about it. “Turns out voting is real.” Well yeah, no shit, you only just got the memo on that did ya Joe?

It was a bit. Good lord.
He spent a whole podcast on the day with Tim Dillon, genuinely not sure who would win. Never once hinting at shenanigans.

Your hatred for someone you no longer listen to is bizarre.

I've despised Alan Jones for years... You know what I do? Not listen to him. I don't go into threads or discuss his nonsense.

What lies? And state of the last 4 years? You think Trump’s 8 trillion dollar deficit had nothing to do with it?

In any other world, if someone hired an 80 year old with Alzheimers, the employees would be pretty pissed, I know we would.

Can you seriously not see how infuriating it is that anyone supports that orange campaigner, including Rogan? It’s just sad man, this billionaire campaigner doesn’t give a **** about the common folk.

I actually couldn't personally give 2 shits who supports who. Especially as an Australian. Touch grass.

I know the Democrats suck but I just don’t see the level of vindictiveness from them that I do from Trump.

That's right, they sucked. And if your gonna wheel out someone new, with 3 months to go of a campaign, after listening to the ramblings of an old man, don't be surprised if the American public didn't trust them.
The country voted for Trump. The people voted him in. Be angry at them. But that was there choice.

Rogan fans would say he’s soft with everyone but I don’t buy he would’ve gone as easy on Kamala as he did on Trump. I genuinely think he’s a stupid person who constantly falls for crap like when Jamie fact checked him about co2 volcanic emissions.

Meh, just your own blind hatred opinion. I take him on face value, based on the thousands of interviews that came before.

 

[bourbons]

Funny how Rogan believes in voting when Trump wins but doesn’t when he loses.

Yeah saw that, "so... voting is actually real", said with wide eyed wonder

Turning into a bit of a caricature ol' Joe

 

[bourbons]

When did he not believe in the voting?
There's at least 6 podcasts where he mentioned he tried to get proof out of Trump, but he played word roller-coaster.

Pretty clear from the statement I just mentioned his take would have been quite different had Harris got up.

 

[Coolangatta]

It was a bit. Good lord.
He spent a whole podcast on the day with Tim Dillon, genuinely not sure who would win. Never once hinting at shenanigans.

Your hatred for someone you no longer listen to is bizarre.

I've despised Alan Jones for years... You know what I do? Not listen to him. I don't go into threads or discuss his nonsense.


In any other world, if someone hired an 80 year old with Alzheimers, the employees would be pretty pissed, I know we would.


I actually couldn't personally give 2 shits who supports who. Especially as an Australian. Touch grass.

That's right, they sucked. And if your gonna wheel out someone new, with 3 months to go of a campaign, after listening to the ramblings of an old man, don't be surprised if the American public didn't trust them.
The country voted for Trump. The people voted him in. Be angry at them. But that was there choice.

Meh, just your own blind hatred opinion. I take him on face value, based on the thousands of interviews that came before.

Australia is impacted by who the idiots in America put into office, though.

Yes, Biden should’ve stepped down two years ago and they should’ve let the voters nominate their preferred candidate of choice but still, Kamala was miles better than Trump.

80% of people prefer her policies but it’s not policies that win elections apparently, it’s vibes and personality and people unable to see how past terms impact the present.

 

[bourbons]

It was a bit. Good lord.

 

[HirdsTheWord]

Australia is impacted by who the idiots in America put into office, though.

Yes, Biden should’ve stepped down two years ago and they should’ve let the voters nominate their preferred candidate of choice but still, Kamala was miles better than Trump.

80% of people prefer her policies but it’s not policies that win elections apparently, it’s vibes and personality and people unable to see how past terms impact the present.

I certainly agree that Biden not stepping down earlier massively hindered their election chances but where did you get the 80% of people preferred Kamala's policies from?

This was the first time in almost 20 years that a republican has won the popular vote, so I'm not sure that is correct?

If the democrats had a proper primary vote, I very much doubt Harris would have won it. I think the democrats needed a clean break from Biden to win the election, which they could have if given the correct amount of time with Biden dropping out much earlier.

 

[bourbons]

I certainly agree that Biden not stepping down earlier massively hindered their election chances but where did you get the 80% of people preferred Kamala's policies from?

This was the first time in almost 20 years that a republican has won the popular vote, so I'm not sure that is correct?

If the democrats had a proper primary vote, I very much doubt Harris would have won it. I think the democrats needed a clean break from Biden to win, which they could have if given the correct amount of time with Biden dropping out much earlier.

Not sure about 80% of people, but a majority prefer Harris' policies even amongst Republicans (once those policies are de-coupled from the party promoting them of course lol)

Republicans favoured Kamala Harris's policies in blind polling

Kamala Harris’s policies were preferred by Republicans to Donald Trump's in blind polling carried out ahead of the election.

www.thelondoneconomic.com

 

[HirdsTheWord]

Not sure about 80% of people, but a majority prefer Harris' policies even amongst Republicans (once those policies are de-coupled from the party promoting them of course lol)

Republicans favoured Kamala Harris's policies in blind polling

Kamala Harris’s policies were preferred by Republicans to Donald Trump's in blind polling carried out ahead of the election.

www.thelondoneconomic.com

I wouldn't trust polling numbers, would use it as a very loose guide only.

Polling had this election tight, turned out to be a complete landslide.

it could also be the case that the majority of people preferred Harris policies but the more core policies like economy etc went trumps way and maybe more people valued that higher which decided their voting choice.

IE, personally Socially i am far more liberal (anti-abortion, gay rights etc etc) where economically I'm far more conservative, so in an election what do I value more? if that makes sense?

 

[bourbons]

I wouldn't trust polling numbers, would use it as a very loose guide only.

Would have to be seriously out of whack to alter the main takeaway (that being far more of Harris' policies are broadly popular than Trump's), like it would have to be a margin of error of about 20%. I know polls haven't been that reliable but no professional poll is going to have an error margin of that size. This poll also had a bit bigger sample size than traditional election polls if I'm understanding correctly.

Wouldn't have thought the idea that large numbers of people vote against their own interests is all that debatable, certainly in the US.

Polling had this election tight, turned out to be a complete landslide.

It really wasn't, Trump just managed to flip the 3 'blue wall' states

Wisconsin, won 49.7% to 48.8% (30k votes)
Michigan, won 49.7% to 48.3% (80k votes)
Pennsylvania, won 50.4% to 48.7% (100k votes)

Not exactly a clobbering.

 

[HirdsTheWord]

Would have to be seriously out of whack to alter the main takeaway (that being more of Harris' policies are broadly popular than Trump's), like it would have to be a margin of error of 20%. This poll also had a bit bigger sample size than traditional election polls if I'm understanding correctly.

Wouldn't have thought the idea that large numbers of people vote against their own interests is all that debatable, certainly in the US.

Meh could very well be.

These pollsters were way off on the main election so IMO you take the rest with a grain of sand. But i get your point.

 

[bourbons]

Meh could very well be.

These pollsters were way off on the main election so IMO you take the rest with a grain of sand. But i get your point.

I don't think they were?

ie. they had the swing states I mentioned as basically toss ups, Trump ended up winning them by a point or 2. Maybe technically outside the margin of error but only just. They are still under polling the Trump vote somewhat but nothing like the discrepancy in '16 and '20.

 

[HirdsTheWord]

It really wasn't, Trump just managed to flip the 3 'blue wall' states

Wisconsin, won 49.7% to 48.8% (30k votes)
Michigan, won 49.7% to 48.3% (80k votes)
Pennsylvania, won 50.4% to 48.7% (100k votes)

Not exactly a clobbering.

I suppose that's down to ones perspective.

they are called blue wall states for nothing.

For trump to win those & win the popular vote, something that hasn't been done in 20 odd years, id call that a clobbering.

Anyways I get your perspective, so all good.

 

[Chief]

Yeah saw that, "so... voting is actually real", said with wide eyed wonder

Turning into a bit of a caricature ol' Joe

Apparently clipped, but no link or time stamp given for the full Experience of that part of Jogan's show.

 

[Coolangatta]

 

[Coolangatta]

^ wise voting choice by supreme intellectual trickle down Rogan. And I could name another ten of these Putin hand picked laughable choices

 

[Kram]

You should give him a try, he's basically the most important person in the world.

Sorry I only have time to make loads of posts on the guy, not to sit down and listen to any of his stuff properly.

 

[Chief]

Sorry I only have time to make loads of posts on the guy, not to sit down and listen to any of his stuff properly.

You should, mate! It would broaden your horizons immensely!

 

[Coolangatta]

Sorry I only have time to make loads of posts on the guy, not to sit down and listen to any of his stuff properly.

So what are we getting wrong then? Rogan isn’t actually a Trump supporting anti Covid vax conspiracy brained ******* that has to get fact checked multiple times and wouldn’t have a ****in clue about the negative impacts of tariffs, deporting illegal immigrants, or trickle down economics?

He does talk about how Trump was best buddies with Epstein does he? What are we missing here?

He didn’t do a drunken rant about a “dork” for supporting high wealth taxes and was too chicken shit to even call out his name (Sam Seder) did he?

What’s the missing context?

How was I taking him out of context when he compared Walz to Kim Jung Un? When’s the last time he’s ever said anything positive about Bernie or Medicare For All? When has he called out Trump and Elon for censoring people?

You tell me, you’re the Rogan expert.


It’s ironic because even if Kamala went on Rogan, no way it would have had the views Trump got. Not saying you personally but many of his fan boys wouldn’t have listened because they’re audience captured by this moron.

But going by your own logic those fans wouldn’t have a right to complain because if you don’t listen to someone for hours and hours you miss the full context.

Except that’s a crock of shit. You can take quotes out of context but that’s only if you omit parts of information that contradict the original quote.

You absolutely can take people in a correct context by snippets of what they say.

You think they flipping dismiss short statements in court unless they come with hours of what that person says?

How much of the view or whatever did you watch before you decided they sucked? Do you watch Fox News or CNN etc frequently to determine if they still suck or not? If not, why not? You’re taking them out of context!

Give me a flipping break.

Also it only takes a fraction of the time to comment on this thread then it does to listen to hours of a meathead moron. I’m not sure your solution to just ignore ignore ignore always helps. Because it does seem like more engagement from the left could turn the tide but too late and that’s another subject.

 

[Coolangatta]

You should, mate! It would broaden your horizons immensely!

Who needs uni degrees when you can listen to Rogan for hours and hours!

 

[Coolangatta]

If the NYT gets something wrong 1% of the time, they are discredited according to Rogan. If Alex Jones gets something right 1% of the time, he’s right about a lot of things.

See the difference? He doesn’t hold media to the same standards. He’s biased, misinformed, and not worth listening to for hours. The podcast world has an even bigger problem with bs than legacy media imo

 

[the_interloper]

If the NYT gets something wrong 1% of the time, they are discredited according to Rogan. If Alex Jones gets something right 1% of the time, he’s right about a lot of things.

See the difference? He doesn’t hold media to the same standards. He’s biased, misinformed, and not worth listening to for hours. The podcast world has an even bigger problem with bs than legacy media imo

Well many (including me) clearly disagree with that.

 

[RCAB]

It appears that people on the right, we're much more reserved and cautioned with what they said, previously. They were obviously worried about losing money or being deplatformed due to spreading harmful disinformation.

They've NOW shifted more from the centre - back to the alt right wing, as you can see in this Asmongold video on Joe Rogan



basically continuing with antivax, medical misinformation and rhetoric...

Somehow justified because Trump won an election.

 

[Coolangatta]

Well many (including me) clearly disagree with that.

Just curious, do you listen for entertainment or for information?

I think there’s a genuinely concerning trend of uneducated youth who get their information about the world from podcasts, and if that’s the case surely you can see how stupid that is.

I don’t think the answer is legacy or left media either. Personally I don’t listen to any of it or about as much as I do Rogan.

Make reading great again. You’ll always learn more from reading articles than podcasts. And books. They don’t keep you up to date with current affairs but they can inform you on what works, what doesn’t and what’s dangerous to implement.

And I see Trump and his sycophants as a threat to democracy and free society but to the internet kids he’s just this clown figure. But it is what it is.

 

[the_interloper]

Just curious, do you listen for entertainment or for information?

I think there’s a genuinely concerning trend of uneducated youth who get their information about the world from podcasts, and if that’s the case surely you can see how stupid that is.

I don’t think the answer is legacy or left media either. Personally I don’t listen to any of it or about as much as I do Rogan.

Make reading great again. You’ll always learn more from reading articles than podcasts. And books. They don’t keep you up to date with current affairs but they can inform you on what works, what doesn’t and what’s dangerous to implement.

And I see Trump and his sycophants as a threat to democracy and free society but to the internet kids he’s just this clown figure. But it is what it is.

I listen to the ones with guests I'm interested in. The vast majority are MMA fighters or boxers, the odd musician, Trump and Musk ones. I generally don't listen to the comedian ones (he has a lot of these).

But yeah purely for entertainment, he's not a news source for me and shouldn't be for anyone, Rogan himself says this.