Tulip
Hall of Famer
- May 3, 2009
- 37,249
- 34,498
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Tottenham
Frawley having a bad year is only something I have heard from Collingwood fans and Damian Barrett. I still can't make sense of it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Probably 1: Hogan
2: Danniher
3: Boyd
4: Patton
really hard to say as boyd and hogan haven't been exposed to AFL footy yet, patton's knees easily drop him till last.
All 4 have top 5 in the AFL potential but 3/4 of them won't make it, Patton probably because of his knees, hogan because of melbournes lack of ability to develop players danniher and boyd it remains to be see what they will become.
Hogan played pretty well in the NAB. Obviously I don't need to say it's not the same as the season proper. But if you can go and watch him against north and richmond, both those teams were playing to win and Hogan stood up IMHO.
Paul Roos and George Stone have a pretty good track record with that kinda stuff.Probably 1: Hogan
2: Danniher
3: Boyd
4: Patton
really hard to say as boyd and hogan haven't been exposed to AFL footy yet, patton's knees easily drop him till last.
All 4 have top 5 in the AFL potential but 3/4 of them won't make it, Patton probably because of his knees, hogan because of melbournes lack of ability to develop players danniher and boyd it remains to be see what they will become.
Paul Roos and George Stone have a pretty good track record with that kinda stuff.
How did he goBump
Good to see McBean get a crack at AFL level, even if it is a practice match.
How did he go
Can't see them doing a roughy/gunston/franklin thing? I canPatton and Boyd are on the same team, which has Jeremy Cameron on it. Can't see them 2 become absolute stars at GWS. The most i'd expect from them is a Chris Dawes 2010-2011 if they are still at GWS.
Can't see them doing a roughy/gunston/franklin thing? I can
Eh, I can see Cameron playing the Gunston role, Patton playing the Roughy role and Boyd doing a sort of Cloke roleMost teams don't can't do that.
Buddy and Roughy and Guntson are totaly different forward anyways. Roughy is a traditional FF, Gunston is a third tall and Buddy is Buddy.
Patton and Boyd are similar (that's why they are both on this list isn't it) the only difference is Cameron who will probably get most of their goals.
Eh, I can see Cameron playing the Gunston role, Patton playing the Roughy role and Boyd doing a sort of Cloke role
Cameron can't play small as well as Gunston. Patton isn't as ahletic as Roughy and if Boyd plays a Cloke role than he won't kick any goals because modt of the delivery is going to Cameron and Patton already.
Disagree Cameron could easily play Gunston's role but ultimately you're right I can't see all 3 of them playing in the same forward line unless Boyd gets shoehorned into the forward ruck role.
Cameron can't play small as well as Gunston. Patton isn't as ahletic as Roughy and if Boyd plays a Cloke role than he won't kick any goals because modt of the delivery is going to Cameron and Patton already.
Call bullshit on the first two. Cameron is very versatile and has the leg and nous to play small. Patton was rated so highly because he's both a man mountain and very athletic.