- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,880
- 54,199
- AFL Club
- Geelong
What if Cerra turns into a bust?
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Traded Jordan Clark and F4 traded to Fremantle for #22 and F3 (Carl)
- Thread starter Mordecai
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Oct 19, 2020
- 25,692
- 35,740
- AFL Club
- Richmond
I am flabbergasted that Jordan Clark is valued the same or greater than Callum Coleman-Jones.
- Jun 22, 2008
- 24,580
- 21,287
- AFL Club
- Geelong
If they've got him, smart by Freo, they want promising local youngsters that want to be there, sometimes they might have to pay a bit extra to get them back.
Stevi_Tigers
TheBrownDog
- Mar 2, 2013
- 55,058
- 116,842
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Manchester United
Poor bell first carlton and now Geelong have gone in without lube
Bell has learnt his lesson and stays out of trade period now
We promoted Walls to do everything
If we're looking at converting players to wingers what's Clark got that Brandon Walker, Michael Frederick or Liam Henry can't provide. All have pace to burn.
We've traded out a fair few second rounders as part of these Lobb, McCarthy, Hogan and Wilson trades with not much to show for it and our recruiting team is reasonable.
We've traded out a fair few second rounders as part of these Lobb, McCarthy, Hogan and Wilson trades with not much to show for it and our recruiting team is reasonable.
5minutes_of_Dew
Senior List
- Oct 15, 2017
- 263
- 498
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
How on earth is this trade still dragging on?
Cats being unreasonable if a straight swap for 22 is on the table considering the bloke is yet to prove anything at the level.
Cats being unreasonable if a straight swap for 22 is on the table considering the bloke is yet to prove anything at the level.
Cats being unreasonable in trade week?
#6 Thorp #7 Selwood LOL
Club Legend
- Jul 11, 2020
- 1,335
- 3,825
- AFL Club
- Geelong
And yet, we're going to end up with more. Seems pretty reasonable to me.
- Feb 12, 2017
- 18,866
- 49,929
- AFL Club
- Geelong
22 + Carlton's pick let's get it done Belly.
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
Youve done better than if you gave up 19. Probably not what both sets of supporters wanted which indicates its fair.
- Jul 13, 2015
- 38,568
- 43,679
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Im sure players who started at age 15 about 40 to 45 years ago has a lot of relevance to here.
The comparison would be against other top 20 draftees from the 2018 draft and what sort of opportunities they are getting and what their change in value would be.
Freoboy in Melbs
Team Captain
- Apr 7, 2010
- 368
- 992
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Yes, you very well may do indeed. However, when you don‘t trade in “good will” and shift the goal posts, there’s a tendency that you pay more down the track one day.
Can you imagine ever making a play for Sean Darcy one day? I wonder how Freo will deal with you guys? Move the goal posts at random, and no good will to reciprocate? Tell Sean he may have to see out his contract, etc.
What goes around, comes around.
Played more games, contracted, Freo didn't have leverage with the PSD, and drafted at a higher pick.
It's not rocket science lol.
Considering some on your board are asking for a second for a 30 year old Ceglar...you might want to pipe down.
5minutes_of_Dew
Senior List
- Oct 15, 2017
- 263
- 498
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Considering half your list are held together by masking tape and need to be home by 4:30 for the early bird special, Cats have bugger all bargaining strength when all their eggs are in one basket for next year.
- Feb 12, 2017
- 18,866
- 49,929
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Looks like Wells has got his way. Reckon he's loving dealing with the WA clubs after the past few years.
This has literally nothing to do with the argument, and makes no sense whatsoever.
How are we 'putting all our eggs in one basket' when we're trading out Clark for a draft pick? We're only getting Ceglar in because we need to replace Fort who Brisbane want, and then we're picking up Stengle as a DFA and taking the rest of our picks to the draft - whatever they end up being.
You may think you came across as 'clever' with your 2748495939th iteration of 'Geelong's list is old' joke, but really you just sound like a moron.
Take your little Geelong v Hawthorn rivalry mindset elsewhere - the adults are talking.
Last edited:
What a headline...
"Sean Darcy Signs impromptu contract in rage over a rival club showing interest in securing the highly talented ruckman."
There is zero chance that Sean Darcy was offended that he was courted by Geelong and even less chance that he rushed through a contract extension such was his disdain for the interest. If you think that he and his manager had not been quietly going about organising this extension and that the decision had anything to do with any rumoured interest - you are in la la land.
Taylor
Community Leader
- Moderator
- #2,970
Do you need him to tell you to your face?
He was storming around the training base huffing and puffing about Sumich suggesting it then as soon as the bye week came up he extended his deal.
It's on video with him explaining the process and how fast it was, they turned it around in a week.
So a bit of confusion here. The anger from Darcy's was directed at one particular journo on twitter who was spreading rubbish about Darcy actively seeking a trade that year when in fact he was doing the opposite.
it may very well have been done in a week but it has nothing to do with him being disgusted at interest from the cats. Every chance he didn’t like the media speculation but your post is drawing an incredibly long and unrealistic bow.
Last edited:
yeh that was widely reported. Suggesting it was anger at the cats interest (if there was interest) was way off the mark.
