- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,815
- 54,110
- AFL Club
- Geelong
What if Cerra turns into a bust?Will either turn out to be better than Cerra or a total bust.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What if Cerra turns into a bust?Will either turn out to be better than Cerra or a total bust.
Yeah, NahWould think a pick the 40s gets this done. Drafted way too early in the first place and hasn't really done much since drafted.
I think there's a bit more to it than that. If the line coach that was keeping him out is gone then is it the same scenario next year? Have a look how easily the cats were pinned in the backline after Stewart went down. A new backline coach would be very likely to be reassessing the whole defensive system, and when he does I'd be extremely surprised if Clark isn't in that backline.
Yes. It absolutely happened.Do you believe the narrative that a line coach didn’t want him and had more pull than thr senior coach about where a player will be selected to play?
Tim Kelly says Hi.....I think at best Freo offer pick 27 and if Geelong don't agree to trade, they have a disgruntled player on their list for another year.
But it’s a ridiculous statement. He looked like one of the players of the draft in year one. Bad injury in year 2. Flat start to this year in new position and then injured again with the shoulder. He’s played a grand total of 5 VFL games in his life.The valuation of players is starting to get out of control by Clubs.
Clark here for example...obviously not rated to be a regular in the team and obviously not rated enough to be played in his preferred position yet he is somehow still “highly rated” by the club and want premium compo return?
Makes no sense to me.
What about how much Fremantle rate him - they've reportedly put a 4-year deal to a contracted player which would suggest they rate Clark highly, and as such Geelong is surely within their rights to request value from the tradeThe valuation of players is starting to get out of control by Clubs.
Clark here for example...obviously not rated to be a regular in the team and obviously not rated enough to be played in his preferred position yet he is somehow still “highly rated” by the club and want premium compo return?
Makes no sense to me.
Educate yo'self.Putting aside all bias you cannot expect to ask a high price for a player you deem not good enough for the firsts.
But it’s a ridiculous statement. He looked like one of the players of the draft in year one. Bad injury in year 2. Flat start to this year in new position and then injured again with the shoulder. He’s played a grand total of 5 VFL games in his life.
Do you believe the narrative that a line coach didn’t want him and had more pull than thr senior coach about where a player will be selected to play?
The line coach is accountable for defensive outcomes so yes. It's not the 1980s. The senior coach will publicly back the on field coaching decisions because it's their job to do so but you have to give the line coach the independence to make their own decisions, otherwise you don't drive accountability. Undermine your line coach and you make their entire analysis and input pointless. You have to back them or sack them. It's that binary.Do you believe the narrative that a line coach didn’t want him and had more pull than thr senior coach about where a player will be selected to play?
I honestly think they're just trying to get freo to go away until next yearQuite happy to let Geelong keep Clark if they are being too unreasonable.
Putting aside all bias you cannot expect to ask a high price for a player you deem not good enough for the firsts.
His original draft pick is largely irrelevant and is not Freo's problem. I really hope the club politely decline Geelongs demand for a high 2nd rounder/low first.
Why are you offering players 4 year deals putting all bias aside? Is Peter Bell completely incompetent? Geelong have said 27 (really 30) won’t be accepted. We accept your polite decline. Hope the price doesn’t go up like it did with Tim KellyQuite happy to let Geelong keep Clark if they are being too unreasonable.
Putting aside all bias you cannot expect to ask a high price for a player you deem not good enough for the firsts.
His original draft pick is largely irrelevant and is not Freo's problem. I really hope the club politely decline Geelongs demand for a high 2nd rounder/low first.
Smart move. They need to keep their young talent.I honestly think they're just trying to get freo to go away until next year
I honestly think they're just trying to get freo to go away until next year
Anther way to put this actually. Let's imagine a completely different club.Do you believe the narrative that a line coach didn’t want him and had more pull than thr senior coach about where a player will be selected to play?
Won’t get a game in Geelong’s senior team for at least another decade, I can see why he is exploring his options.
I honestly think they're just trying to get freo to go away until next year
27 will get it done. Geelong will want a pick around 20 but we won't have it unless we trade. Jordan Dawson is valued at the back end of the first round or early second and he is a better player than Clark.
If the HS article has come from Geelong, it certainly seems so.
Hope this one breaks down if that's actually what Geelong are asking.
It’s like standing on the tee and deciding between driver, 3 wood or an iron on a 275 metre par 4 when thinking of a come-back to a Freo fan whose trying to troll your club. Using anything will do the job.The upside is in a decades time ....he'll be in the starting 22 until his in his late 30's