- Sep 26, 2004
- 47,860
- 64,841
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #1,314
Infractions and thread bans have been handed out.
Keep it civil and on topic, or keep it to yourself.
Thanks.
Keep it civil and on topic, or keep it to yourself.
Thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
There is a loophole that I believe was used in this instance.Perryman is a year younger and apparently the offer was more. So does this mean GWS get pick 1 ?
But they have SOS in charge , wait….The real prize is when you select the next Billings
It's been well established our offer is less than 900k and Cal Twomey has just said that the Giants will get band 1 aswell.
Looks like the threshold for Band 1 is less than 900k and not more as first anticipated.
AFL making rules as they go along nothing new here
When it's announced, Band 2 will be a giggle
You’d be happy for your wage to be publicly known?As supporters we should be asking the AFL for full transperency once & for all because it's not right all this secrecy just adds to the confusion come Free Agency... wouldn't except a corrupt organization to come clean though...
Why are Freo fans getting mad? It's not like any of their trades will be affected.
The bloody comp pick pushing our picks lower will affect our trades.Why are Freo fans getting mad? It's not like any of their trades will be affected.
If i was an AFL player making a ton of money, I would accept that it comes with the job.You’d be happy for your wage to be publicly known?
It does affect the Bolton trade, Richmond are even more likely to be uninterested in their pick 16 which does get slipped back with Levi, Lombard bids it's going to be 19-20.Why are Freo fans getting mad? It's not like any of their trades will be affected.
Lowest AFL player salary is $100k. Every member of the public on that amount or greater now has there wage publicly available.If i was an AFL player making a ton of money, I would accept that it comes with the job.
Hawks shouldn’t have front ended the 6th year them champ
This is apparently correctWas always going to be Band 1 and i posted that about 3 weeks ago
Team structure the deal to get the compo as its a 6 year deal only the 5 years matter
just front end the deal for the first 5 years and its done
was always going to be band 1
The shittest part of free agency. Every club, except for the club actually getting the player pays in draft picks sliding because of compensation.The bloody comp pick pushing our picks lower will affect our trades.
The short of it is, plenty of teams have benefited from free agency. Don't like it? Let's go back to trades being the only way players can move between clubs.
Sure I can just see Richmond now think what was pick9 becoming 10 and 16 becoming pick 18 is just tops.
And these are live picks not picks that NgA embargoed
Or do a proper free agency…
Lose a player? Great - the reward is free cap space to go grab another FA.
The fact that 16 clubs are disadvantaged because Hawks signed a player is ludicrous.
Inventing imaginary picks makes no sense.
Especially when we know the AFL makes the formula up to give what they want.
Nothing about his speech. Never mindIf the AFL has any integrity at all Bassats speech at the BF should not even be considered in the compensation
I think they'll be OK with their other 43 first round picksSure I can just see Richmond now think what was pick9 becoming 10 and 16 becoming pick 18 is just tops.
And these are live picks not picks that NgA embargoed