- Sep 26, 2004
- 48,028
- 65,100
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #1,314
Infractions and thread bans have been handed out.
Keep it civil and on topic, or keep it to yourself.
Thanks.
Keep it civil and on topic, or keep it to yourself.
Thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Might use it on DGBJust don't use those picks on Hunter Clark and Nick Coffield again.
Capped at 5 years is apparently the loopholepretty sure the AFL changed it so you can front load contracts to trigger band 1 compo anymore.
The compo pick is now calculated across the full length of the contract.
Would love someone to confirm if true.
It has been mentioned many times but the media that it wasn'tThat must be gospel then.
Capped at 5 years is apparently the loophole
Might use it on DGB
If pick 16/17 isnt good enough, your club doesn't have to trade him. Hold him to his contract or demand more in return.System works well...
Unrestricted free agent Defender leaves - Compo pick 8
Contracted (3 years) Defender leaves - Trade Pick 16/17
Pick 8 is nice, but the real prize is the salt delivery.
Trade you it for your academy ?St Kilda will meekly accept this priority pick compo per their presidents comments the other night.
Trade you it for your academy ?
I don’t really understand this ‘ignoring father-son and academy bids’ thing.I don’t care about NGA’s. Most likely the clubs wouldn’t have access to them, but this battle pick devalues three of our picks because they’re live.
AFL can **** off
I think all clubs bar the one getting the compo get hurt.Sooo we still get hurt. Freo get hurt more than anyone in these ridiculous compos
The original question is why are Freo fans are upset, we have lost the most on the Battle decision. We have every right to be pissed off, that's all their is too it.I think all clubs bar the one getting the compo get hurt.
But this is where clubs that are astute in managing their salary cap will benefit in future years through picks for cap space and taking on ridiculous contracts.
Perryman, Battle and Cumming surely shouldn’t be too 5% wage earners in the AFL.
I thought the line was $900000?trade radio saying saints offered just over 900k a year
hawks went with 850k
compo was borderline
i'm gonna hide SOS' notebook of Jack Billings lookalikes rnJust don't use those picks on Hunter Clark and Nick Coffield again.
This is where the President of your football club comes in. Get him to publicly spit the dummy and voila. I'm kidding of course the AFL determine the comp and its secret herbs and spices mate.I thought the line was $900000?
Cumming compo hasn’t been announced.The original question is why are Freo fans are upset, we have lost the most on the Battle decision. We have every right to be pissed off, that's all their is too it.
Cumming hasnt gotten band 1 yet as he? But yes, watch Collingwood dump Perryman in 4 years with more than half of his 6 contract left still to pay
The hawks front ended it. Pushed the average over 900 because you only take into account 5 years. This is all hawthorns fault.This is where the President of your football club comes in. Get him to publicly spit the dummy and voila. I'm kidding of course the AFL determine the comp and its secret herbs and spices mate.