phantom13
Moderator
- Moderator
- #7,601
Firstly you can disagree with the policy and philosophy but the names are part of it. Home, away and clash IS literally my policy idea hence the naming convention.Disagree with that, and think need to change terminology too.
It isn't home or away kits - it should be preferred and alternate kits.
You use your preferred kit as much as you can.
No reason why if Carlton away to Sydney or GC that they should not play in their preferred full navy blue kit.
If two teams preferred kits dont clash, both should play in full preferred kit.
Secondly and I’ve explained this as naseum. The purpose is to break any subjectivity from the policy. Part of the current issue is that every team WANTS to wear their preferred home kit every week which means the clash jumper policy is subjective, “is it a clash?”. Get rid of the ability to wear the home jumper if you’re the away team and all of a sudden nobody has that preference anymore.
Carlton v Collingwood is NEVER a shitshow because no one is getting the “traditional” kit.
Now I’ve openly admitted that if the current policy was just implemented properly my idea wouldn’t be necessary but the current policy clearly isn’t gonna be implemented properly. They’ve had however many years of it and we still get shit like Saturday night. I’m also well aware they’ll never implement my idea either but I’ll maintain to the grave it’s the best possible way to do it.