- Jan 30, 2006
- 11,748
- 10,635
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Moderator
- #5,951
I'm sure the same analysis has been done by the Hill on each of Trump's performances or would the page limit be reached?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I haven't seen any of it. Did she keep talking about how much the Cheney's love her?
It's rude (I even talk to garrulous drunks on the train politely!) but how will you ever learn about the the machinations of the particular section of society who are so alone and socially incompetent that need to get reinforcement of their existence by measuring the number of people that respond to their outrageous comments.Ignore function is fantastic
Haris should not be exempt from criticism just because her opponent is awfulI'm sure the same analysis has been done by the Hill on each of Trump's performances or would the page limit be reached?
Haris should not be exempt from criticism just because her opponent is awful
There is a limit though. Some people you can just write off as morons if they constantly show they are morons.It's rude (I even talk to garrulous drunks on the train politely!) but how will you ever learn about the the machinations of the particular section of society who are so alone and socially incompetent that need to get reinforcement of their existence by measuring the number of people that respond to their outrageous comments.
I can imagine him sitting alone in his underwear in a bed sit (sorry, studio apartment) with an Excel spreadsheet open, measuring the responses and the degree of angst he has provoked.
Those of sensitive dispositions may seek to strike this image from their memories
I watched it and about three were like was described in the article: Q on Palestine, tax cuts and one other that I can't recall. The feedback from the audience was quite positive as she stayed after it finished and talked to many one on one.
Kamala gets attacked mainly from the left (people like me), then the MAGA crowd weirdly use that when they are worse on all the things those to the left of Kamala don't like her for.I watched it and about three were like was described in the article: Q on Palestine, tax cuts and one other that I can't recall. The feedback from the audience was quite positive as she stayed after it finished and talked to many one on one.
So she just didn't leave as soon as it was over.
The article seems to read that it is Democrats that are complaining and not the audience.
Which is why I prefer listening/watching on computer with it in the background whilst working.Kamala gets attacked mainly from the left (people like me), then the MAGA crowd weirdly use that when they are worse on all the things those to the left of Kamala don't like her for.
People are simply asking you straight questions about Harris in the Harris thread (you know, the thing you've been banging on about doing for the last 2 months?). You just don't want to do that in this case coz you can't rationalise yet another ridiculous take, so instead you avoid and deflect at all costs - thats the bad faith part.The thing is that if I dont start at a position of 'I hate Trump' then I am seen as bad faith or a troll when all I am doing is offering up a differing opinion.
Something many here have difficulty processing.
My first thought too.Not sure what the message is. Young people to not let old people decide their future, so go vote.....when both candidates are 60+
Can you mods not put people on Ignore?So why make the claim?
What gave you the idea that Kamala Harris is an authoritarian?
Did she sway to Ava Maria for 40 minutes? Surely she’s got more rhythm than Trumpty Dumpty.
Immigration ?I watched it and about three were like was described in the article: Q on Palestine, tax cuts and one other that I can't recall. The feedback from the audience was quite positive as she stayed after it finished and talked to many one on one.
So she just didn't leave as soon as it was over.
The article seems to read that it is Democrats that are complaining and not the audience.
Agree, issue is that Trump seems exempt from criticism for objectively worse performances (or perhaps proper criticism, as opposed to the "yep thats bad but its just Trump, what ya gonna do" and shrug that he usually gets).Haris should not be exempt from criticism just because her opponent is awful
Yeh, The Hill appears to report on things fairly accurately across both sides. They tend to avoid editorials and opinion pieces.Not my point. My point is have they done the same for Donald?
Possibly Trump’s greatest crime of all.Did she sway to Ava Maria for 40 minutes? Surely she’s got more rhythm than Trumpty Dumpty.
Possibly Trump’s greatest crime of all.
By example, he made desperately ungrooving people think it was OK that they have zero groove.
I'm thinking her advisers thought she was so far in front it wasn't needed.
But recent events point to a change in attack.
Advisers must think she's behind.
When people say your dancing looks like you’re jerking off two giraffes, it’s time to stop dancing.Possibly Trump’s greatest crime of all.
By example, he made desperately ungrooving people think it was OK that they have zero groove.
in this matter it's a question of progressive (albeit not very) versus extreme right reactionary and getting the youth motivated and less influenced by past generations as polling shows they lean to the dems. climate change is one key factor to this.Not sure what the message is. Young people to not let old people decide their future, so go vote.....when both candidates are 60+
Wanting to lock up trump and the J6 rioters (sorry “tourists”)Interesting.
What are her authoritarian policies, values, philosophies?
And there it is....Godwin's Law.